AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (5.4 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Research Article | Open Access

Integrated framework for the sustainable conservation and rehabilitation of Nepal’s historic bridges

Arun Paudel1Kabin Lamichhane1Bijaya Jaishi2Baochun Chen3Avimanyu Lal Singh1Krishna Shrestha4Garima Gauli1( )
Department of Civil Engineering, Pulchowk Campus, Institute of Engineering, Tribhuvan University, Pulchowk, Lalitpur 44700, Nepal
Department of Roads, Ministry of Physical Infrastructure and Transport, Kathmandu, Bagmati 44600, Nepal
School of Civil Engineering, Fuzhou University, Fuzhou, Fujian 350108, China
School of Civil Engineering, Fujian University of Technology, Fuzhou, Fujian 350118, China
Show Author Information

Abstract

Nepal’s historic bridges, including timber, stone masonry, and early suspension typologies, are vital components of both the national mobility network and the cultural heritage landscape. However, progressive material deterioration, environmental exposure, increasing service demands, and the lack of standardized conservation frameworks have increased their vulnerability. This study develops an integrated multi-criteria decision framework that jointly evaluates structural condition and cultural significance to support systematic conservation planning. Seven structural and four cultural indicators were identified and weighted using the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) based on responses from 191 experts. Material degradation (0.193) and structural deformation (0.153) emerged as the most influential structural indicators, while local cultural importance (0.295) and historic age (0.276) dominated the cultural dimension. The weighted indicators are combined into a composite scoring model with defined decision thresholds on a ten-point scale: scores below 2.883 indicate replacement, values between 2.883 and 6.289 require retrofitting, and scores above 6.289 support continued use with minor intervention. The framework links each decision range with heritage-sensitive strengthening strategies, providing a transparent and reproducible methodology for balancing structural safety and cultural preservation. The proposed model offers a scalable reference for sustainable management of historic bridge infrastructure in Nepal and similar heritage contexts.

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development (English Edition)
Pages 19-29

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
Paudel A, Lamichhane K, Jaishi B, et al. Integrated framework for the sustainable conservation and rehabilitation of Nepal’s historic bridges. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development (English Edition), 2026, 20(2): 19-29. https://doi.org/10.26599/HTRD.2026.9480095
Part of a topical collection:

228

Views

55

Downloads

0

Crossref

Received: 18 March 2026
Revised: 08 April 2026
Accepted: 29 April 2026
Published: 30 June 2026
© The Author(s) 2026. Published by Tsinghua University Press.

This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).