AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (6.4 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Research Article | Open Access

Lightweight framework for misbehavior detection in internet of vehicles

School of Electronic and Information Engineering, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510641, China
Show Author Information

Abstract

The proliferation of connected vehicles in the Internet of Vehicles (IoV) ecosystem has introduced new security challenges, particularly in the context of internal network attacks. Traditional public key infrastructure (PKI) technologies are no longer sufficient to ensure secure communication within a network that experiences dynamic topology changes and high vehicle density. In response, there is a growing need for a lightweight misbehavior detection framework that offers fast computation and minimal space complexity. This paper presents a novel approach using continuous-time recurrent neural networks for detecting misbehavior in the IoV and assesses their performance against the Vehicular Reference Misbehavior (VeReMi) extension dataset. We compare two recently introduced models—the liquid time-constant (LTC) network and the closed-form continuous-time (CFC) neural network—with the established convolutional neural network-long short-term memory (CNN-LSTM) model. The results indicate that continuous-time neural networks marginally outperform CNN-LSTM on evaluation metrics. Despite LTC and CFC having significantly fewer parameters, making them less complex and more space-efficient than CNN-LSTM, the latter proves to be more time-efficient. Therefore, a careful balance between runtime cost and space complexity must be considered when deploying lightweight neural networks in practical applications.

References

[1]
Chen SZ, Hu JL, Shi Y, et al. A vision of C-V2X: Technologies, field testing, and challenges with chinese development. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 2020, 7(5): 3872−3881.10.1109/JIOT.2020.2974823.
[2]
Boualouache A, Engel T. A survey on machine learning-based misbehavior detection systems for 5g and beyond vehicular networks. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 2023, 25(2): 1128−1172. 10.1109/COMST.2023.3236448.
[3]
Le A, Maple C. Shadows don’t lie: N-sequence trajectory inspection for misbehaviour detection and classification in VANETs. 2019 IEEE 90th Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC2019-Fall). Honolulu. IEEE, 2019: 1−6.
[4]
Hsu HY, Cheng NH, Tsai CW. A deep learning-based integrated algorithm for misbehavior detection system in VANETs. Proceedings of the 2021 ACM International Conference on Intelligent Computing and Its Emerging Applications. Jinan China. ACM, 2021: 53−58.
[5]
GoyaL A, Bhatia A, Yadav A, et al. Misbehavior detection in cooperative intelligent transportation systems using temporal fusion transformer. Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Distributed Computing and Networking. Kharagpur, India. ACM, 2023: 431−437.
[6]
He KM, Zhang XY, Ren SQ, et al. Deep residual learning for image recognition. 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR). Las Vegas. IEEE, 2016: 770−778.
[7]
Chen RTQ, Rubanova Y, Bettencourt J, et al. Neural ordinary differential equations. Proceedings of the 32nd International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems. Montréal, Canada. ACM, 2018: 6572−6583.
[8]
Wang X, Blum EK. Discrete-time versus continuous-time models of neural networks. Journal of Computer and System Sciences, 1992, 45(1): 1−19.
[9]
Hasani RM, Lechner M, Amini A, et al. Liquid time-constant recurrent neural networks as universal approximators. arXiv preprint arXiv: 1811.00321, 2018. https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.1811.00321.
[10]
Lechner M, Hasani R, Amini A, et al. Neural circuit policies enabling auditable autonomy. Nature Machine Intelligence, 2020, 2(10): 642−652.
[11]
Hasani R, Lechner M, Amini A, et al. Closed-form continuous-time neural networks. Nature Machine Intelligence, 2022, 4(11): 992−1003.
[12]
Diffie W, Hellman M. New directions in cryptography. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 1976, 22(6): 644−654. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIT.1976.1055638.
[13]
Alladi T, Kohli V, Chamola V, et al. Artificial intelligence (AI)-empowered intrusion detection architecture for the internet of vehicles [J]. IEEE Wireless Communications, 2021, 28(3): 144−149.10.1109/MWC.001.2000428.
[14]
Alladi T, Agrawal A, Gera B, et al. Deep neural networks for securing IoT enabled vehicular Ad-Hoc networks. ICC 2021 - IEEE International Conference on Communications. Montreal. IEEE, 2021: 1−6.
[15]
Alladi T, Gera B, Agrawal A, et al. DeepADV: a deep neural network framework for anomaly detection in VANETs. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 2021, 70(11): 12013−12023. 10.1109/TVT.2021.3113807
[16]

Alladi T, Kohli V, Chamola V, et al. A deep learning based misbehavior classification scheme for intrusion detection in cooperative intelligent transportation systems[J]. Digital Communications and Networks, 2023, 9(5): 1113–1122.

[17]
Kamel J, Wolf M, Van der Hei RW, et al. VeReMi Extension: a dataset for comparable evaluation of misbehavior detection in VANETs. ICC 2020 - 2020 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC). Dublin. IEEE, 2020: 1−6.
[18]
Kamel J, Haidar F, Ben Jemaa I, et al. A misbehavior authority system for sybil attack detection in C-ITS. 2019 IEEE 10th Annual Ubiquitous Computing, Electronics & Mobile Communication Conference (UEMCON). New York. IEEE, 2019: 1117−1123.
[19]
So S, Sharma P, Petit J. Integrating plausibility checks and machine learning for misbehavior detection in VANET. 2018 17th IEEE International Conference on Machine Learning and Applications (ICMLA). Orlando. IEEE, 2018: 564−571.
[20]
Ercan S, Ayaida M, Messai N. New features for position falsification detection in VANETs using machine learning . ICC 2021 - IEEE International Conference on Communications. Montreal. IEEE, 2021: 1−6.
[21]
Sedar R, Kalalas C, Dini P, et al. Misbehavior detection in vehicular networks: an ensemble learning approach. GLOBECOM 2022 - 2022 IEEE Global Communications Conference. Rio de Janeiro. IEEE, 2022: 1850−1855.
[22]
Sedar R, Kalalas C, Vázquez-gallego F, et al. Reinforcement learning based misbehavior detection in vehicular networks. ICC 2022 - IEEE International Conference on Communications. Seoul. IEEE, 2022: 3550−3555.
[23]
Kohli V, Chougule A, Chamola V, et al. MbRE IDS: an AI and edge computing empowered framework for securing intelligent transportation systems. IEEE INFOCOM 2022 - IEEE Conference on Computer Communications Workshops (INFOCOM WKSHPS). New York. IEEE, 2022: 1−6.
[24]
Kushardianto NC, El Hillali Y, Tatkeu C. 2−step prediction for detecting attacker in vehicle to vehicle communication. 2021 IEEE 94th Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC2021−Fall). Norman. IEEE, 2021: 1−5.
[25]
Van der Heijden RW, Lukaseder T, Kargl F. VeReMi: a dataset for comparable evaluation of misbehavior detection in VANETs. arXiv preprint arXiv: 1804.06701, 2018. https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.1804.06701.
Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development (English Edition)
Pages 13-17
Cite this article:
Gong Y, Hu B-J. Lightweight framework for misbehavior detection in internet of vehicles. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development (English Edition), 2025, 19(1): 13-17. https://doi.org/10.26599/HTRD.2025.9480044

158

Views

24

Downloads

0

Crossref

Altmetrics

Received: 29 April 2024
Revised: 06 August 2024
Accepted: 30 December 2024
Published: 01 April 2025
© The Author(s) 2025.

This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0, http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

Return