AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (3.8 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Research Article | Open Access

Optimal setting of traffic prohibition and warning signs on four-lane highway in plain terrain based on driver's EEG signal

Dongpu Ren1,2Hongwei Zang3Xiuku Li3Qing Lan1,2( )Lei Shi4
Hebei University of Water Resources and Electric Engineering, Office of Science and Technology, Cangzhou, Hebei 061001, China
Hebei Higher Institute of Transportation Infrastructure Research and Development Center for Digital and Intelligent Technology Application, Cangzhou, Hebei 061001, China
Hebei Transportation Bureau, Hejian, Hebei 071700, China
Hebei Expressway Group Limited, Shijiazhuang, Hebei 050035, China
Show Author Information

Abstract

In order to investigate the impact of various highway traffic prohibition and warning signs on four-lane highways in flat regions, electroencephalography (EEG) data from drivers were collected through field experiments. A comprehensive analysis was conducted on EEG potential, time-frequency characteristics, topography, power, and derived indicators. The study aimed to objectively evaluate the effects of different traffic signs on driver behavior by examining the EEG characteristics exhibited by drivers when observing various types of traffic prohibition and warning signs. The result shows that (1) The alterations in frontal lobe potential and EEG power are significantly more pronounced than those observed in a resting state when drivers encounter traffic prohibition and warning signs, suggesting a heightened activation level in the relevant brain regions. This implies that the presence of traffic prohibition and warning signs in this context effectively alerts drivers. (2) Notable differences were identified in the EEG relative power of the β wave and the θ/β power indicator across six categories of traffic prohibition and warning signs, which include crossroads, weight limit, roundabout, T-junction, speed limit, and removal speed limit signs. Specifically, the relative power of the β wave was found to be higher, while the θ/β power indicator was lower for speed limit and removal speed limit signs, indicating that these types of traffic signs are more effective in capturing drivers' attention. (3) Conversely, the relative power of the β wave was lower and the θ/β power indicator was higher for weight limit, crossroads, and T-junction signs, suggesting that these signs are less effective in attracting sufficient attention from drivers. This diminished effectiveness may be attributed to factors such as drivers' habitual behaviors and the surrounding road environment. Consequently, it is recommended that greater emphasis be placed on optimizing weight limit, crossroads, and T-junction signs when enhancing the traffic prohibition and warning signs along this segment of the highway. The results of this study may serve as a valuable reference for the optimization of traffic prohibition and warning signs on similar highways.

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development (English Edition)
Pages 26-36

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
Ren D, Zang H, Li X, et al. Optimal setting of traffic prohibition and warning signs on four-lane highway in plain terrain based on driver's EEG signal. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development (English Edition), 2024, 18(3): 26-36. https://doi.org/10.26599/HTRD.2024.9480020

846

Views

81

Downloads

0

Crossref

Received: 28 June 2023
Revised: 10 November 2023
Accepted: 25 February 2024
Published: 30 September 2024
© The Author(s) 2024.

This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0, http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).