AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (1.1 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Research Article | Open Access

Constipation targeted monostrain and multispecies probiotics: effects on symptoms and gut microbiota

Yanqing Zenga,bPenglin HeaChenang LyuaYuwei WubXinyu ZhaobQihui GubShi WubYouxiong ZhangbXianhu WeibRan Ana( )Qingping Wub ( )
Department of Food Science & Technology, School of Agriculture and Biology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China
National Health Commission Science and Technology Innovation Platform for Nutrition and Safety of Microbial Food, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Microbial Safety and Health, State Key Laboratory of Applied Microbiology Southern China, Institute of Microbiology, Guangdong Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou 510070, China

Peer review under responsibility of Beijing Academy of Food Sciences.

Show Author Information

Highlights

• Probiotics alleviate constipation via gut microbiota modulation.

• Multispecies probiotics show no consistent benefit over monostrain formulations.

• Strain-specific efficacy should guide probiotic selection for constipation relief.

• Rational design of multispecies probiotics can optimize clinical effectiveness.

Abstract

Probiotics, classified into monostrain, multistrain and multispecies formulations, have been suggested as effective interventions for alleviating constipation related symptoms by modulating gut motility and microbiota composition. However, the comparative efficacy of these probiotics has not been systematically evaluated. This study presents a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to assess the effects of monostrain and multispecies probiotics on constipation symptoms and gut microbiota. A total of 15 eligible RCTs were included in the analysis. Probiotic supplementation significantly improved spontaneous bowel movements (standardized mean difference (SMD) = 0.60, 95% confidence interval (CI) (0.27, 0.94), P = 0.0005) and stool consistency (SMD = 0.25, 95% CI (0.03, 0.48), P = 0.03), but had no significant effect on gut transit time (SMD = −0.04, 95% CI (−0.34, 0.27), P = 0.82) or quality of life (QoL) scores (P = 0.42). Importantly, no superior efficacy of multispecies probiotics over monostrain formulations was observed, except for a modest improvement in QoL (P < 0.00001). Additionally, probiotics had a measurable impact on gut microbiota composition, although changes in microbial diversity were not consistently correlated with clinical outcomes. Collectively, these findings suggest that probiotics can be effective in alleviating specific constipation-related symptoms, but the choice between monostrain and multispecies formulations should be based on strain-specific characteristics rather than the number of strains or species included. Additionally, this study underscored the need for future research into optimizing strain combinations and understanding probiotic-host interactions to enhance therapeutic outcomes.

Graphical Abstract

Electronic Supplementary Material

Download File(s)
fshw-15-7-9250509_ESM.docx (1.1 MB)

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
Food Science and Human Wellness
Article number: 9250509

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
Zeng Y, He P, Lyu C, et al. Constipation targeted monostrain and multispecies probiotics: effects on symptoms and gut microbiota. Food Science and Human Wellness, 2026, 15(7): 9250509. https://doi.org/10.26599/FSHW.2025.9250509

1150

Views

66

Downloads

1

Crossref

0

Web of Science

0

Scopus

0

CSCD

Received: 15 August 2024
Revised: 22 November 2024
Accepted: 02 January 2025
Published: 29 July 2026
© 2026 Beijing Academy of Food Sciences. Publishing services by Tsinghua University Press.

This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).