AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (19.2 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Research Article | Open Access

Tributyrin is more effective than tripropionin in reducing plasma cholesterol in hypercholesterolemic hamsters

Shouhe HuangaChi YanaHuafang DingaZixing ChenaHanyue ZhubWensen HecLin LeidZhenyu Chena( )
Food and Nutritional Sciences Program, School of Life Sciences, Faculty of Science, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin 999077, Hong Kong, China
School of Food Science and Engineering, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Intelligent Food Manufacturing, Foshan University, Foshan 528000, China
School of Food and Biological Engineering, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212013, China
College of Food Science, Southwest University, Chongqing 400715, China

Peer review under responsibility of Beijing Academy of Food Sciences.

Show Author Information

Highlights

• Tributyrin (Tb) and tripropionin (Tp) are two triacylglycerols containing three butyric or propionic moieties, respectively.

• Dietary tributyrin (Tb) was more effective than tripropionin (Tp) in mitigating hypercholesterolemia in hamsters.

• Dietary Tb significantly increased the fecal butyrate and total short-chain fatty acids production.

• Tb could increase the excretion of fecal bile acids via upregulating gene expression of CYP7A1 and LXRα.

• Tb increased the gut microbiota diversity, and favorably increased the abundance of beneficial microbial genera.

Abstract

Propionate and butyrate are proven capable of decreasing plasma cholesterol. However, their undesired odor and unpleasant smell limit their direct application as a dietary supplement. In contrast, their respective triacylglycerols tributyrin (Tb) and tripropionin (Tp) are odorless and can be directly used as healthy supplements. In view that no study has investigated the relative biological potency of Tb and Tp, the present study was designed to compare the effects of Tp and Tb on plasma cholesterol and gut microbiota using hypercholesterolemic hamsters as a model. Male golden hamsters were randomly allocated to 6 groups fed one of the following 6 diets, namely, low-cholesterol diet (LCD), high-cholesterol diet (HCD), HCD + 0.5% Tp (LTp), HCD + 1% Tp (HTp), HCD + 0.5% Tb (LTb), and HCD + 1% Tb (HTb). Results showed that Tb administration at 1% could significantly reduce plasma total cholesterol (TC), non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDLC), and the ratio of non-HDLC to HDLC, whereas Tp supplementation had no effect. Mechanistically, Tb but not Tp could decrease plasma cholesterol by increasing the excretion of fecal bile acids via upregulating gene expression of cholesterol 7α-hydroxylase (CYP7A1) and liver X receptor alpha (LXRα). In addition, Tb supplementation at 1% could increase the gut microbiota diversity, reduce the ratio of Firmicutes/Bacteroidetes and favorably increase the abundance of beneficial microbial genera Bifidobacterium. In conclusion, dietary Tb supplementation was more effective than Tp in mitigating hypercholesterolemia by increasing the excretion of fecal bile acids and favorably modulating gut microbiota.

Graphical Abstract

Electronic Supplementary Material

Download File(s)
fshw-14-11-9250425_ESM.docx (238.5 KB)

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
Food Science and Human Wellness
Article number: 9250425

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
Huang S, Yan C, Ding H, et al. Tributyrin is more effective than tripropionin in reducing plasma cholesterol in hypercholesterolemic hamsters. Food Science and Human Wellness, 2025, 14(11): 9250425. https://doi.org/10.26599/FSHW.2024.9250425

3180

Views

210

Downloads

0

Crossref

0

Web of Science

0

Scopus

0

CSCD

Received: 17 October 2024
Revised: 06 November 2024
Accepted: 04 December 2024
Published: 27 November 2025
© 2025 Beijing Academy of Food Sciences. Publishing services by Tsinghua University Press.

This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).