AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (3.2 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Research Article | Open Access

Integrated multi-omics analysis reveals component differences and their regulatory mechanisms of adipose tissue as lard raw material between Bamei and Large White pigs

Rui Li1, Haozhe Han1, Zihang Tie, Ran Wu, Mengmeng Bai, Mingyu Wang, Gongshe Yang, Weijun Pang, Rui Cai( )
Laboratory of Animal Fat Deposition and Muscle Development, Key Laboratory of Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction of Shaanxi Province, College of Animal Science and Technology, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, China

1 These authors contributed equally to this article.

Peer review under responsibility of Beijing Academy of Food Sciences.

Show Author Information

Highlights

• High-throughput sequencing and UPLC-MS/MS were performed to comprehensively quantify the biomolecular composition of backfat in both Bamei and large white pigs.

• Bamei pig backfat exhibited a higher concentration of nutrients, including increased unsaturated triglycerides, free fatty acids, shorter chain-length triglycerides, essential amino acids, vitamins, and antioxidants, along with reduced cholesterol levels.

• The molecular mechanisms underlying these nutritional differences were explored by analyzing significantly different mRNAs and proteins, and integrating the protein-metabolite-lipid pathway regulatory network.

• In the pyruvate metabolic pathway of Bamei pigs, the bioprocess of lactate production was inhibited but the acetyl-CoA production was activated.

Abstract

Bamei pigs, an indigenous Chinese breed, yield meat with a delectable flavor and boast higher carcass fat content compared to commercial breeds, making them a rich food source for humans. However, the differences in lipid and nutrient components between the adipose tissue of Bamei pigs and commercial pigs are still unclear. The study employed UPLC-MS/MS to quantify the composition of lipids and metabolites in the backfat of both Bamei and Large White pigs. A total of 428 lipids and 193 metabolites were significantly different between the 2 groups. Specifically, Bamei pig backfat exhibited altered levels of various lipids and metabolites that may potentially contribute to nutritional and flavor differences, including unsaturated triglycerides, free fatty acids, medium-chain triglycerides, essential amino acids, vitamins and antioxidants, while maintaining reduced cholesterol levels. Furthermore, we delved into the molecular mechanisms underlying these nutritional differences by analyzing significantly different 431 mRNAs and 865 proteins and integrating the regulatory network of protein-metabolite-lipid pathway. Importantly, in the pyruvate metabolic pathway of Bamei pigs, the bioprocess of lactate production was inhibited but the acetyl-CoA production was activated, suggesting the possibility that energy allocation favors the biogenesis of lipid precursors. These findings may contribute to guiding industrial food producers in enhancing the quality of lard at the genetic and molecular levels.

Graphical Abstract

Electronic Supplementary Material

Download File(s)
fshw-15-2-9250355_ESM.docx (7.2 MB)

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
Food Science and Human Wellness
Article number: 9250355

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
Li R, Han H, Tie Z, et al. Integrated multi-omics analysis reveals component differences and their regulatory mechanisms of adipose tissue as lard raw material between Bamei and Large White pigs. Food Science and Human Wellness, 2026, 15(2): 9250355. https://doi.org/10.26599/FSHW.2024.9250355

2130

Views

175

Downloads

0

Crossref

0

Web of Science

0

Scopus

0

CSCD

Received: 14 March 2024
Revised: 24 April 2024
Accepted: 09 August 2024
Published: 09 March 2026
© 2026 Beijing Academy of Food Sciences. Publishing services by Tsinghua University Press.

This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).