AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (6.1 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Research Article | Open Access

Differences in the effects and action modes of gut commensals against dextran sulfate sodium-induced intestinal inflammation

Dingwu Qua,bZhennan Gua,bSaisai Fenga,bLeilei Yua,bFengwei Tiana,bHao Zhanga,b,c,dWei Chena,b,cQixiao Zhaia,b ( )
State Key Laboratory of Food Science and Technology, Jiangnan University, Wuxi 214122, China
School of Food Science and Technology, Jiangnan University, Wuxi 214122, China
National Engineering Research Center for Functional Food, Jiangnan University, Wuxi 214122, China
Wuxi Translational Medicine Research Center and Jiangsu Translational Medicine Research Institute Wuxi Branch, Wuxi 214122, China

Peer review under responsibility of Tsinghua University Press.

Show Author Information

Abstract

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a complex relapsing inflammatory disease in the gut and is driven by complicated host-gut microbiome interactions. Gut commensals have shown different functions in IBD prevention and treatment. To gain a mechanistic understanding of how different commensals affect intestinal inflammation, we compared the protective effects of 6 probiotics (belonging to the genera Akkermansia, Bifidobacterium, Clostridium, and Enterococcus) on dextran sulfate sodium (DSS)-induced colitis in mice with or without gut microbiota. Anti-inflammatory properties (ratio of interleukin (IL)-10 and IL-12) of these strains were also evaluated in an in vitro mesenteric lymph nodes (MLN) co-culture system. Results showed that 4 probiotics (belonging to the species Bifidobacterium breve, Bifidobacterium bifidum, and Enterococcus faecalis) can alleviate colitis in normal mice. The probiotic strains differed in regulating the intestinal microbiota, cytokines (IL-10, IL-1β and interferon (IFN)-γ), and tight junction function (Zonulin-1 and Occludin). By constrast, Akkermansia muciniphila AH39 and Clostridium butyricum FHuNHHMY49T1 were not protective. Interestingly, B. breve JSNJJNM2 with high anti-inflammatory potential in the MLN model could relieve colitis symptoms in antibiotic cocktail (Abx)-treated mice. Meanwhile, E. faecalis FJSWX25M1 induced low levels of cytokines in vitro and showed no beneficial effects. Therefore, we provided insight into the clinical application of probiotics in IBD treatment.

Graphical Abstract

Electronic Supplementary Material

Download File(s)
fshw-13-3-1201_ESM.docx (334.7 KB)

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
Food Science and Human Wellness
Pages 1201-1211

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
Qu D, Gu Z, Feng S, et al. Differences in the effects and action modes of gut commensals against dextran sulfate sodium-induced intestinal inflammation. Food Science and Human Wellness, 2024, 13(3): 1201-1211. https://doi.org/10.26599/FSHW.2022.9250100

2189

Views

468

Downloads

3

Crossref

3

Web of Science

3

Scopus

0

CSCD

Received: 09 July 2022
Revised: 17 October 2022
Accepted: 27 October 2022
Published: 08 February 2024
© 2024 Beijing Academy of Food Sciences. Publishing services by Tsinghua University Press.

This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).