AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (6 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Research Article | Open Access

Comparative investigation of three types of surfactants on the co-stabilization behavior of myofibrillar protein emulsions under low-salt conditions

Huanhuan Xu1, Limei Mo1, Mei Zhong1, Xiuwen Lin1, Linjing Gao1, Qisheng Zhang2, Jinxing Liu3, Jiaxin Chen1( ), Wenwen Hou4( )
College of Food and Bioengineering, Xihua University, Chengdu 610039, China
Sichuan Chuanwei Food Industry Innovation Co., Ltd., Meishan 620010, China
Chengdu Xiwang Food Co., Ltd., Chengdu 611430, China
Sichuan Chengdu CAU Modern Industrial Research Institute, Chengdu 611430, China
Show Author Information

Abstract

This study systematically investigated the effects of three small-molecule surfactants, Tween-20, sodium dodecyl sulphate (SDS), and soy lecithin (SL), on the structure and emulsifying properties of myofibrillar protein (MP). All three surfactants altered MP conformation and reduced surface hydrophobicity via non-covalent interactions. Tween-20 acted primarily through hydrophobic interactions, whereas SDS combined electrostatic and hydrophobic binding, modifying surface charge. SL functioned through hydrogen bonding and hydrophobic interactions with charge shielding effects. With increasing surfactant concentration, the Tween-20-treated emulsion exhibited gradual reductions in particle size to 522.43 nm and ζ-potential to –2.78 mV. The SDS-treated emulsion showed an initial decrease in particle size to 1 562 nm at 0.5%, followed by an increase to 4 315 nm at 1.0%, with ζ-potential decreasing to –26.0 mV. The SL-treated emulsion displayed decreasing trends in both particle size to 2 052.33 nm and ζ-potential to –4.85 mV. Both Tween-20 and SDS produced stable emulsions at 0.1%–0.5%; at 1.0%, Tween-20 caused slight phase separation, whilst SDS caused obvious phase separation. SL exhibited phase separation at all concentrations. Molecular docking confirmed distinct binding modes: Tween-20 bound through hydrophobic interactions, whereas SDS and SL formed hydrogen bonds with specific amino acid residues. These findings clarify surfactant stabilisation mechanisms in MP emulsions, guiding surfactant selection for meat processing.

Graphical Abstract

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
Food Science of Animal Products
Article number: 9240188

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
Xu H, Mo L, Zhong M, et al. Comparative investigation of three types of surfactants on the co-stabilization behavior of myofibrillar protein emulsions under low-salt conditions. Food Science of Animal Products, 2026, 4(4): 9240188. https://doi.org/10.26599/FSAP.2026.9240188

6

Views

0

Downloads

0

Crossref

0

Web of Science

0

Scopus

Received: 19 March 2026
Revised: 11 May 2026
Accepted: 21 July 2026
Published: 15 October 2026
© Beijing Academy of Food Sciences 2026. Food Science of Animal Products published by Tsinghua University Press.

This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).