AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
Home Friction Article
PDF (5.1 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Research Article | Open Access | Just Accepted

Physics-constrained two-stage reconstruction of contact pressure and real contact support in rough elastic contact

Ilkwang Jang1,†, Kisung Kim1,†, Hyeonggeun Jo1, Yong Hoon Jang1( )

1 School of Mechanical Engineering, Yonsei University, 50 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul 03722, Republic of Korea

† Ilkwang Jang and Kisung Kim contributed equally to this work and share first authorship.

Show Author Information

Abstract

In rough tribological interfaces, the real contact area and local contact-pressure distribution are essential descriptors of asperity-scale load transfer and provide input fields for analyses of friction, wear, contact fatigue, and thermal or electrical contact resistance. Repeated high-resolution reconstruction of these fields from surface topography remains computationally demanding. This study proposes a physics-constrained two-stage deep-learning framework that separates latent pressure regression from contact-support prediction and combines the two outputs through hard gating. Hard gating enforces non-negative pressure and exactly zero pressure outside predicted support, while a Focal root-mean-square error (RMSE) loss emphasizes sparse high-pressure pixels. Separate load-specific models were trained at 30, 60, and 90 N. A controlled critic-on/off ablation at 256×256 and 30 N showed comparable reconstruction accuracy with and without adversarial training, indicating that the dominant performance gain arises from the two-stage formulation and hard gating rather than from the adversarial component itself. On synthetic RMD-generated rough-surface datasets, the model achieved a mean Dice score of 0.9909 and a mean pixel-wise accuracy of 0.9587; at 30 N, RU2 was 0.9995 and the p99.9 relative error was 0.0049. Batch-1 end-to-end inference required 9.0 ms at  resolution on an NVIDIA RTX 3090 GPU. The predictions preserved prescribed load, contact-area trends, and dependence on RMS slope. An auxiliary test on axisymmetric oblate spheroidal profiles assessed smooth circular single-patch reconstruction, with the numerical fields checked against independent full-profile contact theory. On measured sandpaper-finished steel topographies without fine-tuning, mean Dice and coefficient of determination were 0.940 and 0.970 against FFT-BEM numerical references. Within the prescribed-load, frictionless linear-elastic regime, the framework provides a physics-constrained surrogate for rapid reconstruction of FFT-BEM-consistent contact-support and pressure fields.

Graphical Abstract

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
Friction

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
Jang I, Kim K, Jo H, et al. Physics-constrained two-stage reconstruction of contact pressure and real contact support in rough elastic contact. Friction, 2026, https://doi.org/10.26599/FRICT.2026.9441327

540

Views

27

Downloads

0

Crossref

0

Web of Science

0

Scopus

0

CSCD

Received: 05 June 2026
Revised: 24 September 2026
Accepted: 23 October 2026
Available online: 23 October 2026

© The Author(s) 2026.

This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0, http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).