AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
Home Friction Article
PDF (9.2 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Research Article | Open Access | Online First

A novel rolling contact fatigue testing method based on dry–wet alternation and damage mechanism of rails

Honghao Wang1Haohao Ding1Qunli Zhang2Qian Xiao3Wenjian Wang1Shuyue Zhang1( )Qiyue Liu1Zhongrong Zhou1
Tribology Research Institute, State Key Laboratory of Traction Power, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 610031, China
Institute of Laser Advanced Manufacturing, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou 310023, China
State Key Laboratory of Performance Monitoring Protecting of Rail Transit Infrastructure, East China Jiaotong University, Nanchang 330013, China
Show Author Information

Abstract

Rolling contact fatigue (RCF) damage is a critical damage form faced by rails, especially under rainy and humid conditions. To deeply explore the mechanisms of RCF damage under such conditions, a novel wet–dry alternation testing method (D/W-A test) was proposed, and damage evolution tests of rail RCF were conducted in this study. Detailed comparisons between the novel testing method and three widely used rail RCF methods were analyzed. The results show that under wet–dry alternating conditions, the crack growth rate and wear rate were initially low, with cracks predominantly located in the region near the rail surface. Thus, there was a significant competitive relationship between crack propagation and wear in this period. Then, with increasing number of cycles, RCF damage was gradually dominated by crack propagation, which extended deeper into the material along its deformation orientation. Meanwhile, severe material spalling led to a rapid increase in the wear rate. Through comparative analysis of the accuracy, repeatability, evaluability, rationality, and practicability of the four testing methods, it was found that the novel method proposed in this study had significant advantages in rationality and accuracy compared with traditional RCF testing methods, providing a more effective tool for systematic studies on the RCF performance of rail materials.

Graphical Abstract

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
Friction

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
Wang H, Ding H, Zhang Q, et al. A novel rolling contact fatigue testing method based on dry–wet alternation and damage mechanism of rails. Friction, 2026, https://doi.org/10.26599/FRICT.2026.9441232

659

Views

58

Downloads

0

Crossref

0

Web of Science

0

Scopus

0

CSCD

Received: 04 July 2024
Revised: 04 January 2026
Accepted: 07 February 2026
Published: 03 September 2026
© The Author(s) 2026.

This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0, http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).