AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
Home Friction Article
PDF (3.4 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Research Article | Open Access

Quantifying cross-country ski–snow friction using real-time kinematic positioning

Kalle Kalliorinne1Joakim Sandberg1Gustav Hindér1Hans-Christer Holmberg2Matej Supej3Roland Larsson1Andreas Almqvist1,4( )
Division of Machine Elements, Luleå University of Technology, Luleå 97187, Sweden
Division of Health, Medicine and Rehabilitation, Luleå University of Technology, Luleå 97187, Sweden
Faculty of Sport, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana 1000, Slovenia
Swedish Olympic Committee, Stockholm 11433, Sweden
Show Author Information

Graphical Abstract

Abstract

In cross-country skiing, athletes expend large amounts of energy to overcome friction as their skis interact with snow. Even minor reductions in the friction can significantly influence race outcomes. Over the years, researchers have found many ways of quantifying ski–snow friction, but there are only a few methods that consider the glide of real-sized skis under natural conditions during both accelerating and decelerating movements. This study introduces a novel experimental setup, consisting of a sled equipped with authentic cross-country skis and a base station that uses satellite receivers to communicate via radio, constituting a real-time kinematic positioning system with centimetre accuracy. While the sled was running on a classic ski track with natural height variations, altitude and velocity data were recorded for quantification of the coefficient of friction (COF), both for accelerating and decelerating motion, employing a model based on Newton’s second law. The results show that the COF during acceleration was more than 20% higher than during deceleration, demonstrating dynamic changes in the frictional behaviour between these phases. This finding is crucial for the execution of all types of cross-country skiing techniques, where the athlete either accelerates or decelerates while moving forward. The ability of the current experimental set-up to distinguish between the COF during acceleration and deceleration has considerable implications for further developments.

References

[1]

Street G M, Gregory R W. Relationship between glide speed and Olympic cross-country ski performance. J Appl Biomech 10(4): 393–399 (1994)

[2]

Coupe R C, Spells S J. Towards a methodology for comparing the effectiveness of different alpine ski waxes. Phys Eng 12(2): 55–62 (2009)

[3]

BreitschŠdel F, Berre V, Andersen R, Stjernstr¿m E. A comparison between timed and IMU captured Nordic ski glide tests. Procedia Eng 34: 397–402 (2012)

[4]

Swarén M, Karlöf L, Holmberg H C, Eriksson A. Validation of test setup to evaluate glide performance in skis. Phys Technol 7(1–2): 89–97 (2014)

[5]

Pellegrini B, Sandbakk Ø, Stöggl T, Supej M, Ørtenblad N, Schürer A, Steiner T, Lunina A, Manhard C, Liu H, et al. Methodological guidelines designed to improve the quality of research on cross-country skiing. J Sci Sport Exerc 3(3): 207–223 (2021)

[6]

Wolfsperger F, Meyer F, Gilgien M. The snow-friction of freestyle skis and snowboards predicted from snow physical quantities. Front Mech Eng 7: 728722 (2021)

[7]

Kalliorinne K, Hindér G, Sandberg J, Larsson R, Holmberg H C, Almqvist A. The impact of cross-country skiers’ tucking position on ski-camber profile, apparent contact area and load partitioning. P I Mech Eng P—J Spo: 17543371221141748 (2023)

[8]

Bowden F P. The mechanism of sliding on ice and snow. Proc R Soc Lond A 172(949): 280–298 (1939)

[9]

Oksanen P, Keinonen J. The mechanism of friction of ice. Wear 78(3): 315–324 (1982)

[10]

Buhl D, Fauve M, Rhyner H. The kinetic friction of polyethylen on snow: The influence of the snow temperature and the load. Cold Reg Sci Technol 33(2–3): 133–140 (2001)

[11]

Bäurle L, Szabó D, Fauve M, Rhyner H, Spencer N D. Sliding friction of polyethylene on ice: Tribometer measurements. Tribol Lett 24(1): 77–84 (2006)

[12]
Sturesson P. Friction characteristics between ski base and ice-fundamental lab scale tests and practical implications”. Ph.D. Thesis. Uppsala (Sweden): Uppsala Universitet, 2008.
[13]

Lever J H, Taylor S, Hoch G R, Daghlian C. Evidence that abrasion can govern snow kinetic friction. J Glaciol 65(249): 68–84 (2019)

[14]

Böttcher R, Scherge M. Ski preparation as a three-dimensional problem. Gliding 4: 19–23 (2017)

[15]

Bowden F P. Friction on snow and ice. Proc R Soc Lond A 217(1131): 462–478 (1953)

[16]
Lehtovaara A. Kinetic Friction Between Ski and Snow. Helsinki (Finland): Finnish Academy of Technology, 1989: 1–52.
[17]

Giesbrecht J L, Smith P, Tervoort T A. Polymers on snow: Toward skiing faster. J Polym Sci Poly Phys 48(13): 1543–1551 (2010)

[18]

Lungevics J, Jansons E, Gross K A. An ice track equipped with optical sensors for determining the influence of experimental conditions on the sliding velocity. Latv J Phys Tech Sci 55(1): 64–75 (2018)

[19]

Velkavrh I, Lungevičs J, Jansons E, Klien S, Voyer J, Ausserer F. The influence of isotropic surface roughness of steel sliders on ice friction under different testing conditions. Lubricants 7(12): 106 (2019)

[20]

Schindelwig K, Hasler M, Van Putten J, Rohm S, Nachbauer W. Temperature below a gliding cross country ski. Procedia Eng 72: 380–385 (2014)

[21]

Rohm S, Hasler M, Knoflach C, van Putten J, Unterberger S H, Schindelwig K, Lackner R, Nachbauer W. Friction between steel and snow in dependence of the steel roughness. Tribol Lett 59(1): 27 (2015)

[22]

Hasler M, Schindelwig K, Mayr B, Knoflach C, Rohm S, van Putten J, Nachbauer W. A novel ski–snow tribometer and its precision. Tribol Lett 63(3): 33 (2016)

[23]

Rohm S, Knoflach C, Nachbauer W, Hasler M, Kaserer L, van Putten J, Unterberger S H, Lackner R. Effect of different bearing ratios on the friction between ultrahigh molecular weight polyethylene ski bases and snow. ACS Appl Mater Inter 8(19): 12552–12557 (2016)

[24]

Lemmettylä T, Heikkinen T, Ohtonen O, Lindinger S, Linnamo V. The development and precision of a custom-made skitester. Front Mech Eng 7: 661947 (2021)

[25]

Auganæs S B, Buene A F, Klein-Paste A. Laboratory testing of cross-country skis—Investigating tribometer precision on laboratory-grown dendritic snow. Tribol Int 168: 107451 (2022)

[26]
Tjorstad R N. An investigation of ski-snow friction. M.D. Thesis. University of Oslo, 2018.
[27]

Okajima J, Okabe T, Miyamoto N, Morimoto T, Tsunoda K, Hatakeyama N. Experimental and numerical evaluation of temperature variation by frictional heating at the interface between snow and ski. J Biomech Sci Eng 15(1): 19-00507 (2020)

[28]

Bowden F P. Some recent experiments in friction: Friction on snow and ice and the development of some fast-running skis. Nature 176(4490): 946–947 (1955)

[29]

Budde R, Himes A. High-resolution friction measurements of cross-country ski bases on snow. Phys Eng 20(4): 299–311 (2017)

[30]

Sandberg J, Kalliorinne K, Hindér G, Holmberg H C, Almqvist A, Larsson R. A novel free-gliding ski tribometer for quantification of ski–snow friction with high precision. Tribol Lett 71(4): 111 (2023)

[31]

Supej M, Sætran L, Oggiano L, Ettema G, Šarabon N, Nemec B, Holmberg H C. Aerodynamic drag is not the major determinant of performance during giant slalom skiing at the elite level. Scand J Med Sci Phys 23(1): e38–e47 (2013)

[32]

Supej M, Spörri J, Holmberg H C. Methodological and practical considerations associated with assessment of alpine skiing performance using global navigation satellite systems. Front Sports Act Living 1: 74 (2020)

[33]

Supej M. 3D measurements of alpine skiing with an inertial sensor motion capture suit and GNSS RTK system. J Phys Sci 28(7): 759–769 (2010)

[34]

Supej M, Holmberg H C. Monitoring the performance of alpine skiers with inertial motion units: Practical and methodological considerations. J Sci Sport Exerc 3(3): 249–256 (2021)

[35]

Andersson E, Supej M, Sandbakk Ø, Sperlich B, Stöggl T, Holmberg H C. Analysis of sprint cross-country skiing using a differential global navigation satellite system. Eur J Appl Physiol 110(3): 585–595 (2010)

[36]

Supej M, Holmberg H C. A new time measurement method using a high-end global navigation satellite system to analyze alpine skiing. Res Q Exerc Sport 82(3): 400–411 (2011)

[37]

Supej M, Čuk I. Comparison of global navigation satellite system devices on speed tracking in road (tran)SPORT applications. Sensors 14(12): 23490–23508 (2014)

[38]
Kaplan E D, Hegarty C J. Understanding GPS: Principles and Applications. Norwood (UK): Artech House, 2006.
[39]

Angrisano A, Cappello G, Del Pizzo S, Gaglione S. Time-differenced carrier phase technique for precise velocity estimation on an Android smartphone. Sensors 22(21): 8514 (2022)

[40]
u-blox. Achieving centimeter level performance with low cost antennas—White paper. 2016. https://content.u-blox.com/sites/default/files/documents/AntennasForRTK_WhitePaper_%28UBX-16010559%29.pdf
[41]

Ji L, Sun R, Cheng Q, Wang J H. Evaluation of the performance of GNSS-based velocity estimation algorithms. Satell Navig 3(1): 18 (2022)

[42]

Zdravkovich M M, Flaherty A J, Pahle M G, Skelhorne I A. Some aerodynamic aspects of coin-like cylinders. J Fluid Mech 360: 73–84 (1998)

[43]

Böttcher R, Seidelmann M, Scherge M. Sliding of UHMWPE on ice: Experiment vs. modeling. Cold Reg Sci Technol 141: 171–180 (2017)

[44]
Nachbauer W, Kaps P, Hasler M, Mössner M. Friction between ski and snow. In: The Engineering Approach to Winter Sports. Braghin F, Cheli F, Maldifassi S, Melzi S, Sabbioni E, Eds. New York: Springer New York, 2016: 17–32.
[45]

Auganæs S B, Buene A F, Klein-Paste A. The effect of load and binding position on the friction of cross-country skis. Cold Reg Sci Technol 212: 103884 (2023)

[46]

Danielsen J, Sandbakk Ø, McGhie D, Ettema G. Mechanical energetics and dynamics of uphill double-poling on roller-skis at different incline-speed combinations. PLoS One 14(2): e0212500 (2019)

Friction
Article number: 9441011
Cite this article:
Kalliorinne K, Sandberg J, Hindér G, et al. Quantifying cross-country ski–snow friction using real-time kinematic positioning. Friction, 2025, 13(4): 9441011. https://doi.org/10.26599/FRICT.2025.9441011

667

Views

99

Downloads

0

Crossref

0

Web of Science

0

Scopus

0

CSCD

Altmetrics

Received: 12 June 2024
Revised: 12 August 2024
Accepted: 22 September 2024
Published: 27 February 2025
© The Author(s) 2025.

This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0, http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

Return