390
Views
56
Downloads
1
Crossref
0
WoS
0
Scopus
N/A
CSCD
Over the recent years, we have been witnessing spectacular achievements of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning (ML), in particular. We have seen highly visible accomplishments encountered in natural language processing and computer vision impacting numerous areas of human endeavours. Being driven inherently by the technologically advanced learning and architectural developments, ML constructs are highly impactful coming with far reaching consequences; just to mention autonomous vehicles, health care imaging, decision-making processes in critical areas, among others. The quality of ML architectures and credibility of generated results are inherently implied by the nature, quality, and amount of available data. The credibility of ML models and confidence quantified their results are also of paramount concern to any critical application. In this study, we advocate that the credibility (confidence) of results produced by ML constructs is inherently expressed in the form of information granules. Several development scenarios are carefully revisited including those involving constructs in statistics (confidence and prediction intervals), probability (Gaussian process models), and granular parameters (fuzzy sets and interval techniques). We augment the commonly encountered and challenging category of applications of ML referred to as federated learning where the aspect of quality of the model and its results calls for a thorough assessment.
Over the recent years, we have been witnessing spectacular achievements of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning (ML), in particular. We have seen highly visible accomplishments encountered in natural language processing and computer vision impacting numerous areas of human endeavours. Being driven inherently by the technologically advanced learning and architectural developments, ML constructs are highly impactful coming with far reaching consequences; just to mention autonomous vehicles, health care imaging, decision-making processes in critical areas, among others. The quality of ML architectures and credibility of generated results are inherently implied by the nature, quality, and amount of available data. The credibility of ML models and confidence quantified their results are also of paramount concern to any critical application. In this study, we advocate that the credibility (confidence) of results produced by ML constructs is inherently expressed in the form of information granules. Several development scenarios are carefully revisited including those involving constructs in statistics (confidence and prediction intervals), probability (Gaussian process models), and granular parameters (fuzzy sets and interval techniques). We augment the commonly encountered and challenging category of applications of ML referred to as federated learning where the aspect of quality of the model and its results calls for a thorough assessment.
W. Pedrycz, Granular computing for data analytics: A manifesto of human-centric computing, IEEE/CAA J. Autom. Sin., vol. 5, no. 6, pp. 1025–1034, 2018.
L. A. Zadeh, Toward a theory of fuzzy information granulation and its centrality in human reasoning and fuzzy logic, Fuzzy Sets Syst., vol. 90, no. 2, pp. 111–127, 1997.
W. Pedrycz, Towards green machine learning: Challenges, opportunities, and developments, J. Smart Environ. Green Comput., vol. 2, pp. 163–174, 2022.
A. B. Arrieta, N. Díaz-Rodríguez, J. Del Ser, A. Bennetot, S. Tabik, A. Barbado, S. Garcia, S. Gil-Lopez, D. Molina, R. Benjamins, et al., Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, taxonomies, opportunities and challenges toward responsible AI, Inf. Fusion, vol. 58, pp. 82–115, 2020.
D. Dubois and H. Prade, An introduction to fuzzy systems, Clin. Chim. Acta, vol. 270, no. 1, pp. 3–29, 1998.
W. Pedrycz, Shadowed sets: Representing and processing fuzzy sets, IEEE Trans. Syst., Man, Cybern., Part B (Cybern.), vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 103–109, 1998.
Y. Yao, S. Wang, and X. Deng, Constructing shadowed sets and three-way approximations of fuzzy sets, Inf. Sci., vol. 412−413, pp. 132–153, 2017.
J. M. Mendel, R. I. John, and F. Liu, Interval Type-2 fuzzy logic systems made simple, IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst., vol. 14, no. 6, pp. 808–821, 2006.
S. Abdulrahman, H. Tout, H. Ould-Slimane, A. Mourad, C. Talhi, and M. Guizani, A survey on federated learning: The journey from centralized to distributed on-site learning and beyond, IEEE Internet Things J., vol. 8, no. 7, pp. 5476–5497, 2021.
X. Hu, Y. Shen, W. Pedrycz, X. Wang, A. Gacek, and B. Liu, Identification of fuzzy rule-based models with collaborative fuzzy clustering, IEEE Trans. Cybern., vol. 52, no. 7, pp. 6406–6419, 2022.
This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).