AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (832.5 KB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Article | Open Access

Why the effectiveness of ETSs on green innovation differs? The perspective from price stabilization mechanisms

Banban Wang1Wenbo Zhu2( )Deyong Song1
School of Economics, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, China
School of Business, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, China
Show Author Information

Abstract

Key policy elements may affect the effectiveness of an emissions trading system (ETS). In this paper, we find that price stabilization mechanisms (PSMs), one of a set of key policy elements aiming at supporting increasing and stable carbon prices, may affect the performance of ETS in terms of green innovation. By using the case of China’s regional carbon market pilots and data of listed firms, we found that pilots adopting both price-based and quantity-based PSMs significantly induced green innovation activities in covered firms, while a single type does not guarantee the effect. PSMs help to do so by lifting carbon prices and reducing firms’ perceived uncertainties. The above effects would be enhanced in firms with lower asset reversibility, lower ability of cost passthrough, higher ability of innovation, and state-owned enterprises.

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
Energy and Climate Management
Article number: 9400020

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
Wang B, Zhu W, Song D. Why the effectiveness of ETSs on green innovation differs? The perspective from price stabilization mechanisms. Energy and Climate Management, 2025, 1(4): 9400020. https://doi.org/10.26599/ECM.2025.9400020
Part of a topical collection:

2907

Views

343

Downloads

1

Crossref

Received: 19 May 2025
Revised: 28 July 2025
Accepted: 28 September 2025
Published: 30 October 2025
© The Author(s) 2025.

This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0, http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).