AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (759 KB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Article | Open Access

Aligning China’s local and national carbon markets under global carbon pricing

Chunyan Dai1,2( )Michael G. Pollitt3
Dual Carbon Innovation Research Institute of Chongqing Technology and Business University, Chongqing 400067, China
Chongqing Key Laboratory of Intelligent Business and Supply Chain, Chongqing 400067, China
Energy Policy Research Group, Cambridge Judge Business School, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB21AG, UK
Show Author Information

Abstract

The pressing challenge of climate change, driven by escalating carbon emissions, necessitates urgent global action and innovative policy frameworks. Among various strategies, Emissions Trading Systems (ETSs) have emerged as a pivotal tool to mitigate greenhouse gas emissions while fostering economic efficiency. However, as countries strive to meet ambitious carbon neutrality targets, China faces a critical specific challenge: the integration and expansion of its nascent national carbon market (CN-ETS) amid the complexities of transitioning from the local carbon market (CL-ETS). And it was exacerbated by data inconsistencies and regulatory complexity. Despite the growing body of research on carbon markets, a significant knowledge gap persists regarding insufficient understanding of how multi-level carbon markets (local/national) can synergistically coexist to accelerate sectoral coverage while leveraging international policy pressures (e.g., Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM)). Our study employs Triangulated Institutional Analysis (policy archaeology, cognitive mapping, quantitative validation) of 346 documents and 22 expert interviews. Key findings reveal: (1) CN-ETS expansion is constrained by Measurement, Reporting, Verification (MRV) bottlenecks; (2) EU CBAM imposes a 2034 deadline for full CN-ETS maturity; (3) CL-ETS pilots retain vital “triple innovation functions” (small and medium enterprise (SME) coverage, carbon finance, regulatory experimentation) under a dual-track coexistence model. We challenge three prevailing assumptions: “domestic priority” (CBAM drives domestic reform), “system-first” (local pilots enable national legislation), and “technological determinism” (political mutual recognition trumps pure tech upgrades). Our framework offers emerging economies a strategic blueprint for carbon market integration under cross-border carbon pressures.

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
Energy and Climate Management
Article number: 9400017

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
Dai C, Pollitt MG. Aligning China’s local and national carbon markets under global carbon pricing. Energy and Climate Management, 2025, 1(3): 9400017. https://doi.org/10.26599/ECM.2025.9400017
Part of a topical collection:

2772

Views

247

Downloads

0

Crossref

Received: 05 January 2025
Revised: 04 April 2025
Accepted: 19 June 2025
Published: 20 August 2025
© The Author(s) 2025.

This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0, http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).