Discover the SciOpen Platform and Achieve Your Research Goals with Ease.
Search articles, authors, keywords, DOl and etc.
A dramatic scaling of renewable energy is needed to achieve global climate goals. In this paper, we systematically present the potential set of opportunities that exist for the United States and China to engage on overseas renewable energy development finance. We find that there is substantial complementarity in the institutions and instruments that the U.S. and China have deployed to promote development finance overseas. Given their relative specializations, we find that there is a potential opportunity for further U.S.-China coordination and cooperation on overseas renewable energy. In combining our assessment of initiatives that would have the most impact and yet also be viable in terms of the level of coordination that is feasible under current conditions, we recommend a focus on the following areas for expanding U.S.-China engagement on renewable energy development finance: 1) joint project finance; 2) joint capacity building efforts and 3) parallel bilateral investment principles and standards. These three areas pose a significant potential for accelerating the renewable energy transition by increasing financing opportunities in the Global South and are areas where both countries would see a common interest and benefit to expanding cooperation and coordination, even in the current environment.
Chen, X., Li, Z., Gallagher, K. P., Mauzerall, D. L. (2021). Financing carbon lock-in in developing countries: Bilateral financing for power generation technologies from China, Japan, and the United States. Applied Energy, 300: 117318.
Sauer, J. M. T., Anadón, L. D., Kirchherr, J., Plummer Braeckman, J., Schulhof, V. (2022). Chinese and multilateral development finance in the power sector. Global Environmental Change, 75: 102553.
Cheng, S., Wang, B. (2023). Impact of the Belt and Road Initiative on China’s overseas renewable energy development finance: Effects and features. Renewable Energy, 206: 1036–1048.
Chen, X., Gallagher, K. P., Mauzerall, D. L. (2020). Chinese overseas development financing of electric power generation: A comparative analysis. One Earth, 3: 491–503.
Helveston, J. P., He, G., Davidson, M. R. (2022). Quantifying the cost savings of global solar photovoltaic supply chains. Nature, 612: 83–87.
Davidson, M. R., Karplus, V. J., Lewis, J. I., Nahm, J., Wang, A. (2022). Risks of decoupling from China on low-carbon technologies. Science, 377: 1266–1269.
Lewis, J. I. (2024). The climate risk of green industrial policy. Current History, 123: 14–19.
Ray, R., Gallagher, K. P., Kring, W., Pitts, J., Simmons, B. A. (2021). Geolocated dataset of Chinese overseas development finance. Scientific Data, 8: 241.
Brautigam, D., Hwang, J. (2019). Great walls over African rivers: Chinese engagement in African hydropower projects. Development Policy Review, 37: 313–330.
Chin, G. T., Gallagher, K. P. (2019). Coordinated credit spaces: The globalization of Chinese development finance. Development and Change, 50: 245–274.
Zhao, J. (2002). The multilateral fund and China’s compliance with the Montreal protocol. The Journal of Environment & Development, 11: 331–354.
Sakurai, M. Y. (2015). The post-2015 development agenda and South–South and Triangular Cooperation—How the partnership model should be. Global Social Policy, 15: 337–341.
Li, J., Omoju, O., Zhang, J., Ikhide, E., Lu, G., adedoyin isola, L., Ozue, V. (2020). Does intellectual property rights protection constitute a barrier to renewable energy? An econometric analysis. National Institute Economic Review, 251: R37–R46.
This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).