AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (9.7 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Original Article | Open Access

Comparing the Hippocampal Volume Between Patients with Alzheimer’s Disease and Healthy Controls: An MRI Analysis using the Harmonized Hippocampal Protocol

Hai Dac Nguyen1Tri Huynh2,4My Nguyen3,4Ha Nguyen1Luan Cong Bui1Tri Minh Ta2,4Hai Nguyen2,4Huong Ha2,4( )
April 30th Hospital, Ho Chi Minh City 70000, Vietnam
School of Biomedical Engineering, International University, Ho Chi Minh City 70000, Vietnam
Faculty of Biology–Biotechnology, University of Science, Ho Chi Minh City 70000, Vietnam
Vietnam National University ‐ Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh City 70000, Vietnam
Show Author Information

Abstract

Objective

To compare the hippocampal volume between individuals with normal cognitive function (CN) and those with Alzheimer’s disease (AD) using the European Alzheimer’s Disease Consortium (EADC)–Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) Harmonized Hippocampal Protocol (HarP).

Methods

This retrospective study included 84 participants (42 individuals each in the AD and CN groups) from April 30th Hospital (Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam). The AD diagnosis adhered to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition. Participants underwent neuropsychological tests and whole brain magnetic resonance scans for cognitive function and hippocampal volume assessments. The AD participants were categorized into four subgroups based on the severity of their cognitive decline, determined using the Mini‐Mental State Examination scores (AD1: ≥24, AD2: 20–23, AD3: 14–19, and AD4: 0–13). Qualified radiologists used HarP to measure the whole and sectional hippocampal volumes. Statistical analyses were performed to compare the hippocampal volume differences between the AD and CN groups considering disease severity, sex, and age. A multifactor regression analysis was conducted to explore the predictive factors for hippocampal volume.

Results

The neuropsychological test findings (p‐value < 0.001), but not demographic data (sex, education, body mass index, medical history), were significantly different among the AD subgroups. The whole (AD: 4.158 ± 0.989 cm3; CN: 5.884 ± 0.517 cm3) and sectional hippocampal volumes were significantly different between the AD and CN groups (p‐value < 0.0001). Specifically, the whole and sectional hippocampal volumes were significantly different between the AD2 subgroup and CN group (p‐value < 0.05). Besides, multifactor regression analysis showed a minimal impact of the demographic factors on the whole hippocampal volume.

Conclusion

Our study highlights the association between AD and reduced hippocampal volume, emphasizing its significance in the disease’s pathology. Our data support the effectiveness of the HarP in measuring hippocampal volume.

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
Brain Science Advances
Pages 1-17

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
Nguyen HD, Huynh T, Nguyen M, et al. Comparing the Hippocampal Volume Between Patients with Alzheimer’s Disease and Healthy Controls: An MRI Analysis using the Harmonized Hippocampal Protocol. Brain Science Advances, 2024, 10(4): 1-17. https://doi.org/10.26599/BSA.2024.9050009

1067

Views

99

Downloads

0

Crossref

Received: 27 May 2024
Revised: 18 August 2024
Accepted: 24 September 2024
Published: 01 July 2025
© The authors 2024.

This article is published with open access at journals.sagepub.com/home/BSA Creative Commons Non Commercial CC BY-NC: This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).