JJ Vidal. Toward direct brain-computer communication. Annu Rev Biophys Bioeng. 1973, 2(1): 157-180.
JR Wolpaw, N Birbaumer, DJ McFarland, et al. Brain-computer interfaces for communication and control. Clin Neurophysiol. 2002, 113(6): 767-791.
M Akcakaya, B Peters, M Moghadamfalahi, et al. Noninvasive brain-computer interfaces for augmentative and alternative communication. IEEE Rev Biomed Eng. 2014, 7: 31-49.
BJ Edelman, J Meng, D Suma, et al. Noninvasive neuroimaging enhances continuous neural tracking for robotic device control. Sci Robot. 2019, 4(31): eaaw6844.
A Biasiucci, R Leeb, I Iturrate, et al. Brain-actuated functional electrical stimulation elicits lasting arm motor recovery after stroke. Nat Commun. 2018, 9(1): 2421.
JH Pan, QY Xie, PM Qin, et al. Prognosis for patients with cognitive motor dissociation identified by brain-computer interface. Brain. 2020, 143(4): 1177-1189.
XG Chen, YJ Wang, M Nakanishi, et al. High-speed spelling with a noninvasive brain-computer interface. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2015, 112(44): E6058-E6067.
SK Gao, YJ Wang, XR Gao, et al. Visual and auditory brain-computer interfaces. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2014, 61(5): 1436-1447.
VJ Lawhern, AJ Solon, NR Waytowich, et al. EEGNet: a compact convolutional neural network for EEG-based brain-computer interfaces. J Neural Eng. 2018, 15(5): 056013.
XY Zhu, PY Li, CB Li, et al. Separated channel convolutional neural network to realize the training free motor imagery BCI systems. Biomed Signal Process Control. 2019, 49: 396-403.
F Marini, C Lee, J Wagner, et al. A comparative evaluation of signal quality between a research-grade and a wireless dry-electrode mobile EEG system. J Neural Eng. 2019, 16(5): 054001.
J Jiang, EW Yin, CH Wang, et al. Incorporation of dynamic stopping strategy into the high-speed SSVEP-based BCIs. J Neural Eng. 2018, 15(4): 046025.
S Hétu, M Grégoire, A Saimpont, et al. The neural network of motor imagery: an ALE meta-analysis. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2013, 37(5): 930-949.
G Pfurtscheller, FH Lopes da Silva. Event-related EEG/MEG synchronization and desynchronization: basic principles. Clin Neurophysiol. 1999, 110(11): 1842-1857.
C Sannelli, T Dickhaus, S Halder, et al. On optimal channel configurations for SMR-based brain- computer interfaces. Brain Topogr. 2010, 23(2): 186-193.
J Müller-Gerking, G Pfurtscheller, H Flyvbjerg. Designing optimal spatial filters for single-trial EEG classification in a movement task. Clin Neurophysiol. 1999, 110(5): 787-798.
N Padfield, J Zabalza, HM Zhao, et al. EEG-based brain-computer interfaces using motor-imagery: techniques and challenges. Sensors. 2019, 19(6): E1423.
S Saha, M Baumert. Intra- and inter-subject variability in EEG-based sensorimotor brain computer interface: a review. Front Comput Neurosci. 2019, 13: 87.
F Lotte, L Bougrain, A Cichocki, et al. A review of classification algorithms for EEG-based brain- computer interfaces: a 10 year update. J Neural Eng. 2018, 15(3): 031005.
C Vidaurre, M Kawanabe, P von Bünau, et al. Toward unsupervised adaptation of LDA for brain-computer interfaces. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2011, 58(3): 587-597.
R Zhang, P Xu, LJ Guo, et al. Z-score linear discriminant analysis for EEG based brain-computer interfaces. PLoS One. 2013, 8(9): e74433.
W Wu, Z Chen, XR Gao, et al. Probabilistic common spatial patterns for multichannel EEG analysis. IEEE T Pattern Anal. 2014, 37(3): 639-653.
R Lorenz, J Pascual, B Blankertz, et al. Towards a holistic assessment of the user experience with hybrid BCIs. J Neural Eng. 2014, 11(3): 035007.
MH Lee, OY Kwon, YJ Kim, et al. EEG dataset and OpenBMI toolbox for three BCI paradigms: an investigation into BCI illiteracy. Gigascience. 2019, 8(5): giz002.
C Vidaurre, B Blankertz. Towards a cure for BCI illiteracy. Brain Topogr. 2010, 23(2): 194-198.
A Kübler, N Neumann, J Kaiser, et al. Brain- computer communication: self-regulation of slow cortical potentials for verbal communication. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2001, 82(11): 1533-1539.
EM Hammer, T Kaufmann, SC Kleih, et al. Visuo- motor coordination ability predicts performance with brain-computer interfaces controlled by modulation of sensorimotor rhythms (SMR). Front Hum Neurosci. 2014, 8: 574.
MC Thompson. Critiquing the concept of BCI illiteracy. Sci Eng Ethics. 2019, 25(4): 1217-1233.
C Sannelli, C Vidaurre, KR Müller, et al. A large scale screening study with a SMR-based BCI: Categorization of BCI users and differences in their SMR activity. PLoS One. 2019, 14(1): e0207351.
C Guger, G Edlinger, W Harkam, et al. How many people are able to operate an EEG-based brain- computer interface (BCI)? IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2003, 11(2): 145-147.
B Blankertz, C Sannelli, S Halder, et al. Neurophysiological predictor of SMR-based BCI performance. NeuroImage. 2010, 51(4): 1303-1309.
R Zhang, P Xu, R Chen, et al. Predicting inter- session performance of SMR-based brain-computer interface using the spectral entropy of resting-state EEG. Brain Topogr. 2015, 28(5): 680-690.
L Acqualagna, L Botrel, C Vidaurre, et al. Large- scale assessment of a fully automatic co-adaptive motor imagery-based brain computer interface. PLoS One. 2016, 11(2): e0148886.
KJ Kokotilo, JJ Eng, A Curt. Reorganization and preservation of motor control of the brain in spinal cord injury: a systematic review. J Neurotrauma. 2009, 26(11): 2113-2126.
G Pfurtscheller, P Linortner, R Winkler, et al. Discrimination of motor imagery-induced EEG patterns in patients with complete spinal cord injury. Comput Intell Neurosci. 2009: 104180.
A Vuckovic, MA Hasan, B Osuagwu, et al. The influence of central neuropathic pain in paraplegic patients on performance of a motor imagery based Brain Computer Interface. Clin Neurophysiol. 2015, 126(11): 2170-2180.
F Pichiorri, G Morone, M Petti, et al. Brain-computer interface boosts motor imagery practice during stroke recovery. Ann Neurol. 2015, 77(5): 851-865.
ME Raichle, AM MacLeod, AZ Snyder, et al. A default mode of brain function. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001, 98(2): 676-682.
HI Suk, S Fazli, J Mehnert, et al. Predicting BCI subject performance using probabilistic spatio- temporal filters. PLoS One. 2014, 9(2): e87056.
M Ahn, H Cho, S Ahn, et al. High theta and low alpha powers may be indicative of BCI-illiteracy in motor imagery. PLoS One. 2013, 8(11): e80886.
M Ahn, S Ahn, JH Hong, et al. Gamma band activity associated with BCI performance: simultaneous MEG/EEG study. Front Hum Neurosci. 2013, 7: 848.
M Grosse-Wentrup, B Schölkopf. High γ-power predicts performance in sensorimotor-rhythm brain- computer interfaces. J Neural Eng. 2012, 9(4): 046001.
JL Reichert, SE Kober, C Neuper, et al. Resting-state sensorimotor rhythm (SMR) power predicts the ability to up-regulate SMR in an EEG-instrumental conditioning paradigm. Clin Neurophysiol. 2015, 126(11): 2068-2077.
CJ Stam, EC van Straaten. The organization of physiological brain networks. Clin Neurophysiol. 2012, 123(6): 1067-1087.
FL Li, TJ Liu, F Wang, et al. Relationships between the resting-state network and the P3: Evidence from a scalp EEG study. Sci Rep. 2015, 5: 15129.
YJ Si, L Jiang, Q Tao, et al. Predicting individual decision-making responses based on the functional connectivity of resting-state EEG. J Neural Eng. 2019, 16(6): 066025.
FL Li, JJ Wang, YY Liao, et al. Differentiation of schizophrenia by combining the spatial EEG brain network patterns of rest and task P300. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2019, 27(4): 594-602.
Y Zhang, P Xu, D Guo, et al. Prediction of SSVEP-based BCI performance by the resting-state EEG network. J Neural Eng. 2013, 10(6): 066017.
J Wu, R Srinivasan, A Kaur, et al. Resting-state cortical connectivity predicts motor skill acquisition. Neuroimage. 2014, 91: 84-90.
R Zhang, DZ Yao, PA Valdés-Sosa, et al. Efficient resting-state EEG network facilitates motor imagery performance. J Neural Eng. 2015, 12(6): 066024.
T Zhang, TJ Liu, FL Li, et al. Structural and functional correlates of motor imagery BCI performance: Insights from the patterns of fronto-parietal attention network. Neuroimage. 2016, 134: 475-485.
OA Mokienko, AV Chervyakov, SN Kulikova, et al. Increased motor cortex excitability during motor imagery in brain-computer interface trained subjects. Front Comput Neurosci. 2013, 7: 168.
T Mulder. Motor imagery and action observation: cognitive tools for rehabilitation. J Neural Transm. 2007, 114(10): 1265-1278.
S Halder, D Agorastos, R Veit, et al. Neural mechanisms of brain-computer interface control. NeuroImage. 2011, 55(4): 1779-1790.
XK Shu, SG Chen, L Yao, et al. Fast recognition of BCI-inefficient users using physiological features from EEG signals: a screening study of stroke patients. Front Neurosci. 2018, 12: 93.
FL Li, CL Yi, LM Song, et al. Brain network reconfiguration during motor imagery revealed by a large-scale network analysis of scalp EEG. Brain Topogr. 2019, 32(2): 304-314.
PA Valdés-Hernández, A Ojeda-González, E Martínez- Montes, et al. White matter architecture rather than cortical surface area correlates with the EEG alpha rhythm. NeuroImage. 2010, 49(3): 2328-2339.
TJ Whitford, CJ Rennie, SM Grieve, et al. Brain maturation in adolescence: concurrent changes in neuroanatomy and neurophysiology. Hum Brain Mapp. 2007, 28(3): 228-237.
S Halder, B Varkuti, M Bogdan, et al. Prediction of brain-computer interface aptitude from individual brain structure. Front Hum Neurosci. 2013, 7: 105.
JN Gong, C Luo, XB Chang, et al. White matter connectivity pattern associate with characteristics of scalp EEG signals. Brain Topogr. 2017, 30(6): 797-809.
K Kasahara, CS DaSalla, M Honda, et al. Neuroanatomical correlates of brain-computer interface performance. Neuroimage. 2015, 110: 95-100.
JR Wolpaw, N Birbaumer, WJ Heetderks, et al. Brain-computer interface technology: a review of the first international meeting. IEEE Trans Rehab Eng. 2000, 8(2): 164-173.
T Hinterberger, R Veit, B Wilhelm, et al. Neuronal mechanisms underlying control of a brain-computer interface. Eur J Neurosci. 2005, 21(11): 3169-3181.
F Nijboer, N Birbaumer, A Kübler. The influence of psychological state and motivation on brain- computer interface performance in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis-a longitudinal study. Front Neurosci. 2010, 4: 55.
M Witte, SE Kober, M Ninaus, et al. Control beliefs can predict the ability to up-regulate sensorimotor rhythm during neurofeedback training. Front Hum Neurosci. 2013, 7: 478.
EM Hammer, S Halder, B Blankertz, et al. Psychological predictors of SMR-BCI performance. Biol Psychol. 2012, 89(1): 80-86.
C Jeunet, B N'Kaoua, S Subramanian, et al. Predicting mental imagery-based BCI performance from personality, cognitive profile and neurophysiological patterns. PLoS One. 2015, 10(12): e0143962.
A Guillot, C Collet, VA Nguyen, et al. Brain activity during visual versus kinesthetic imagery: an fMRI study. Hum Brain Mapp. 2009, 30(7): 2157-2172.
C Neuper, R Scherer, M Reiner, et al. Imagery of motor actions: differential effects of kinesthetic and visual-motor mode of imagery in single-trial EEG. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2005, 25(3): 668-677.
A Vuckovic, BA Osuagwu. Using a motor imagery questionnaire to estimate the performance of a Brain-Computer Interface based on object oriented motor imagery. Clin Neurophysiol. 2013, 124(8): 1586-1595.
S Marchesotti, M Bassolino, A Serino, et al. Quantifying the role of motor imagery in brain-machine interfaces. Sci Rep. 2016, 6: 24076.
S Rimbert, N Gayraud, L Bougrain, et al. Can a subjective questionnaire be used as brain-computer interface performance predictor? Front Hum Neurosci. 2018, 12: 529.
DJ Krusienski, M Grosse-Wentrup, F Galán, et al. Critical issues in state-of-the-art brain-computer interface signal processing. J Neural Eng. 2011, 8(2): 025002.
V Mondini, AL Mangia, A Cappello. EEG-based BCI system using adaptive features extraction and classification procedures. Comput Intell Neurosci. 2016, 2016: 4562601.
A Singh, S Lal, HW Guesgen. Reduce calibration time in motor imagery using spatially regularized symmetric positives-definite matrices based classification. Sensors. 2019, 19(2): E379.
C Vidaurre, C Sannelli, KR Müller, et al. Co- adaptive calibration to improve BCI efficiency. J Neural Eng. 2011, 8(2): 025009.
G Pfurtscheller, C Neuper. Motor imagery and direct brain-computer communication. Proc IEEE. 2001, 89(7): 1123-1134.
YY Tang, YH Ma, JH Wang, et al. Short-term meditation training improves attention and self- regulation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2007, 104(43): 17152-17156.
P Eskandari, A Erfanian. Improving the performance of brain-computer interface through meditation practicing. In 2008 30th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Vancouver, BC, Canada, 2008, pp 662-665.
LF Tan, Z Dienes, A Jansari, et al. Effect of mindfulness meditation on brain-computer interface performance. Conscious Cogn. 2014, 23: 12-21.
YQ Tan, LF Tan, SY Mok, et al. Effect of short term meditation on brain-computer interface performance. J Med Bioeng. 2015, 4(2): 135-138.
M Gregg, C Hall, A Butler. The MIQ-RS: a suitable option for examining movement imagery ability. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2010, 7(2): 249-257.
C Dettmers, M Benz, J Liepert, et al. Motor imagery in stroke patients, or plegic patients with spinal cord or peripheral diseases. Acta Neurol Scand. 2012, 126(4): 238-247.
BA Osuagwu, A Vuckovic. Similarities between explicit and implicit motor imagery in mental rotation of hands: an EEG study. Neuropsychologia. 2014, 65: 197-210.
BA Osuagwu, M Zych, A Vuckovic. Is implicit motor imagery a reliable strategy for a brain- computer interface? IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2017, 25(12): 2239-2248.
XK Shu, L Yao, XJ Sheng, et al. Enhanced motor imagery-based BCI performance via tactile stimulation on unilateral hand. Front Hum Neurosci. 2017, 11: 585.
C Zich, S Debener, C Kranczioch, et al. Real-time EEG feedback during simultaneous EEG-fMRI identifies the cortical signature of motor imagery. Neuroimage. 2015, 114: 438-447.
JJ Meng, B He. Exploring training effect in 42 human subjects using a non-invasive sensorimotor rhythm based online BCI. Front Hum Neurosci. 2019, 13: 128.
A Kaplan, A Vasilyev, S Liburkina, et al. Poor BCI performers still could benefit from motor imagery training. In Foundations of Augmented Cognition: Neuroergonomics and Operational Neuroscience. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. DD Schmorrow, CM Fidopiastis, Eds. Cham, USA: Springer International Publishing, 2016.
C Jeunet, E Jahanpour, F Lotte. Why standard brain- computer interface (BCI) training protocols should be changed: an experimental study. J Neural Eng. 2016, 13(3): 036024.
L Botrel, L Acqualagna, B Blankertz, et al. Short progressive muscle relaxation or motor coordination training does not increase performance in a brain- computer interface based on sensorimotor rhythms (SMR). Int J Psychophysiol. 2017, 121: 29-37.
L Botrel, A Kübler. Week-long visuomotor coordination and relaxation trainings do not increase sensorimotor rhythms (SMR) based brain-computer interface performance. Behav Brain Res. 2019, 372: 111993.
HF Chen, Q Yang, W Liao, et al. Evaluation of the effective connectivity of supplementary motor areas during motor imagery using Granger causality mapping. Neuroimage. 2009, 47(4): 1844-1853.
Q Gao, XJ Duan, HF Chen. Evaluation of effective connectivity of motor areas during motor imagery and execution using conditional Granger causality. Neuroimage. 2011, 54(2): 1280-1288.
FL Li, WJ Peng, YL Jiang, et al. The dynamic brain networks of motor imagery: time-varying causality analysis of scalp EEG. Int J Neural Syst. 2019, 29(1): 1850016.
C Brunner, R Scherer, B Graimann, et al. Online control of a brain-computer interface using phase synchronization. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2006, 53(12 Pt 1): 2501-2506.
M Billinger, C Brunner, GR Müller-Putz. Single-trial connectivity estimation for classification of motor imagery data. J Neural Eng. 2013, 10(4): 046006.
R Zhang, XP Li, YW Wang, et al. Using brain network features to increase the classification accuracy of MI-BCI inefficiency subject. IEEE Access. 2019, 7: 74490-74499.
YR Tabar, U Halici. A novel deep learning approach for classification of EEG motor imagery signals. J Neural Eng. 2017, 14(1): 016003.
RT Schirrmeister, JT Springenberg, LDJ Fiederer, et al. Deep learning with convolutional neural networks for EEG decoding and visualization. Hum Brain Mapp. 2017, 38(11): 5391-5420.