Journal Home > Volume 5 , Issue 4

Empathy for pain is a hotspot in the field of empathy research because of its specific cognitive and neural mechanism. Currently, studies of empathy for pain can be classified into two categories based on the body regions receiving the painful stimulus, i.e., empathy for face pain and empathy for body pain, which conveys painful information based on individuals’ faces or body parts, respectively. Although the existing evidence revealed differences between these two kinds of pain empathy regarding the underlying cognitive and neural mechanisms, the current studies tend to confuse these findings. Therefore, we summarized the differences between empathy for face and body pain, mainly regarding the behavioral reactivity tendency, brain activations, and electrophysiological (EEG) signals. These differences probably stem from the fact that the human face contains more emotional information, while other body parts contain more perceptual information. Thus, future studies should identify the distinctions between empathy for face and body pain, to explore further how empathy for face pain is affected by the facial information of others and focus on empathy for face pain in individuals with psychopathological disorders. Furthermore, the specific reasons for these distinctions and their underlying neuromechanisms deserve to be further reviewed.


menu
Abstract
Full text
Outline
About this article

Differences between empathy for face and body pain: Cognitive and neural responses

Show Author's information Xiong LiYinya ZhangBinyang XiangJing Meng( )
Key Laboratory of Applied Psychology, Chongqing Normal University, Chongqing 401331, China

Abstract

Empathy for pain is a hotspot in the field of empathy research because of its specific cognitive and neural mechanism. Currently, studies of empathy for pain can be classified into two categories based on the body regions receiving the painful stimulus, i.e., empathy for face pain and empathy for body pain, which conveys painful information based on individuals’ faces or body parts, respectively. Although the existing evidence revealed differences between these two kinds of pain empathy regarding the underlying cognitive and neural mechanisms, the current studies tend to confuse these findings. Therefore, we summarized the differences between empathy for face and body pain, mainly regarding the behavioral reactivity tendency, brain activations, and electrophysiological (EEG) signals. These differences probably stem from the fact that the human face contains more emotional information, while other body parts contain more perceptual information. Thus, future studies should identify the distinctions between empathy for face and body pain, to explore further how empathy for face pain is affected by the facial information of others and focus on empathy for face pain in individuals with psychopathological disorders. Furthermore, the specific reasons for these distinctions and their underlying neuromechanisms deserve to be further reviewed.

Keywords: empathy, empathy for pain, face, cognitive and neural mechanisms

References(33)

[1]
T Singer, C Lamm. The social neuroscience of empathy. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2009, 1156: 81-96.
[2]
J Meng, L Hu, L Shen, et al. Emotional primes modulate the responses to others’ pain: an ERP study. Exp Brain Res. 2012, 220(3/4): 277-286.
[3]
C Lamm, J Decety, T Singer. Meta-analytic evidence for common and distinct neural networks associated with directly experienced pain and empathy for pain. Neuroimage. 2011, 54(3): 2492-2502.
[4]
J Meng, YG Chen, XT Huang. Influencing factors and the mechanism of empathy for pain (in Chinese). Adv Psychol Sci. 2010, 18(3): 432-440.
[5]
Y Fan, SH Han. Temporal dynamic of neural mechanisms involved in empathy for pain: an event- related brain potential study. Neuropsychologia. 2008, 46(1): 160-173.
[6]
YE Xiang, YC Wang, SH Gao, et al. Neural mechanisms with respect to different paradigms and relevant regulatory factors in empathy for pain. Front Neurosci. 2018, 12: 507.
[7]
XS Gu, SH Han. Attention and reality constraints on the neural processes of empathy for pain. Neuroimage. 2007, 36(1): 256-267.
[8]
X Li, Z Li, B Xiang, et al. Empathy for pain in Individuals with autistic traits influenced by attention cues: Evidence from an ERP study (in Chinese). Acta Psychol Sin. 2020, 52(3): 294-306.
[9]
J Meng, L Shen, ZS Li, et al. Top-down effects on empathy for pain in adults with autistic traits. Sci Rep. 2019, 9(1): 8022.
[10]
KR Leslie, SH Johnson-Frey, ST Grafton. Functional imaging of face and hand imitation: towards a motor theory of empathy. Neuroimage. 2004, 21(2): 601-607.
[11]
E Vachon-Presseau, M Roy, MO Martel, et al. Neural processing of sensory and emotional-communicative information associated with the perception of vicarious pain. Neuroimage. 2012, 63(1): 54-62.
[12]
MP Coll. Meta-analysis of ERP investigations of pain empathy underlines methodological issues in ERP research. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2018, 13(10): 1003-1017.
[13]
XM Gao, L Weng, Q Zhou, et al. Dose violent offenders have lower capacity of empathy for pain: evidence from ERPs (in Chinese). Acta Psychol Sin. 2015, 47(4): 478-487.
[14]
J Meng, L Shen, ZS Li, et al. Top-down attention modulation on the perception of others' vocal pain: an event-related potential study. Neuropsychologia. 2019, 133: 107177.
[15]
J Meng, T Jackson, H Chen, et al. Pain perception in the self and observation of others: an ERP investigation. Neuroimage. 2013, 72: 164-173.
[16]
XJ Xu, XY Zuo, XY Wang, et al. Do You feel my pain? Racial group membership modulates empathic neural responses. J Neurosci. 2009, 29(26): 8525-8529.
[17]
S Fabi, H Leuthold. Racial bias in empathy: Do we process dark- and fair-colored hands in pain differently? An EEG study. Neuropsychologia. 2018, 114: 143-157.
[18]
A Avenanti, A Sirigu, SM Aglioti. Racial bias reduces empathic sensorimotor resonance with other-race pain. Curr Biol. 2010, 20(11): 1018-1022.
[19]
SH Han, Y Fan, XJ Xu, et al. Empathic neural responses to others’ pain are modulated by emotional contexts. Hum Brain Mapp. 2009, 30(10): 3227-3237.
[20]
F Cui, N Ma, YJ Luo. Moral judgment modulates neural responses to the perception of other's pain: an ERP study. Sci Rep. 2016, 6: 20851.
[21]
RJ Itier, MJ Taylor. N170 or N1? Spatiotemporal differences between object and face processing using ERPs. Cereb Cortex. 2004, 14(2): 132-142.
[22]
RJ Itier, MJ Taylor. Inversion and contrast polarity reversal affect both encoding and recognition processes of unfamiliar faces: a repetition study using ERPs. Neuroimage. 2002, 15(2): 353-372.
[23]
A Ibáñez, E Hurtado, A Lobos, et al. Subliminal presentation of other faces (but not own face) primes behavioral and evoked cortical processing of empathy for pain. Brain Res. 2011, 1398: 72-85.
[24]
J Song, FB Guo, Z Zhang, et al. Interpersonal distance influences on pain empathy: Friends priming effect (in Chinese). Acta Psychol Sin. 2016, 48(7): 833-844.
[25]
Y Mu, Y Fan, LH Mao, et al. Event-related theta and alpha oscillations mediate empathy for pain. Brain Res. 2008, 1234: 128-136.
[26]
YW Cheng, CY Yang, CP Lin, et al. The perception of pain in others suppresses somatosensory oscillations: a magnetoencephalography study. Neuroimage. 2008, 40(4): 1833-1840.
[27]
X Li, XX Meng, H Li, et al. The impact of mood on empathy for pain: Evidence from an EEG study. Psychophysiology. 2017, 54(9): 1311-1322.
[28]
MP Coll, MB Tremblay, PL Jackson. The effect of tDCS over the right temporo-parietal junction on pain empathy. Neuropsychologia. 2017, 100: 110-119.
[29]
B Enzi, S Amirie, M Brüne. Empathy for pain-related dorsolateral prefrontal activity is modulated by angry face perception. Exp Brain Res. 2016, 234(11): 3335-3345.
[30]
M Stirrat, DI Perrett. Valid facial cues to cooperation and trust: male facial width and trustworthiness. Psychol Sci. 2010, 21(3): 349-354.
[31]
G Rhodes. The evolutionary psychology of facial beauty. Annu Rev Psychol. 2006, 57: 199-226.
[32]
N Adler, J Dvash, SG Shamay-Tsoory. Empathic embarrassment accuracy in autism spectrum disorder. Autism Res. 2015, 8(3): 241-249.
[33]
A Khorrami, M Tehrani-Doost, H Esteky. Comparison between face and object processing in youths with autism spectrum disorder: an event related potentials study. Iran J Psychiatry. 2013, 8(4): 179-187.
Publication history
Copyright
Acknowledgements
Rights and permissions

Publication history

Received: 31 October 2019
Revised: 28 November 2019
Accepted: 06 December 2019
Published: 18 May 2020
Issue date: December 2019

Copyright

© The authors 2019

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Project Commissioned by the 13th Five-year Plan of Chongqing Education Science in 2019 (No. 2019-WT-28).

Rights and permissions

Creative Commons Non Commercial CC BY-NC: This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage)

Return