AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
Powered by AMiner. Clicking this button will take you away from SciOpen.
Home Big Data Mining and Analytics Article
PDF (2.6 MB)
Cite
EndNote(RIS) BibTeX
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Open Access

Exploring Applications of Convolutional Neural Networks in Analyzing Multispectral Satellite Imagery: A Systematic Review

Department of Electronics and Computer Science, Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Mechanical Engineering and Naval Architecture, University of Split, Split 21000, Croatia
Show Author Information

Abstract

Remote sensing is of great importance for analyzing and studying various phenomena occurrence and development on Earth. Today is possible to extract features specific to various fields of application with the application of modern machine learning techniques, such as Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN) on MultiSpectral Images (MSI). This systematic review examines the application of 1D-, 2D-, 3D-, and 4D-CNNs to MSI, following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. This review addresses three Research Questions (RQ): RQ1: “In which application domains different CNN models have been successfully applied for processing MSI data?”, RQ2: “What are the commonly utilized MSI datasets for training CNN models in the context of processing multispectral satellite imagery?”, and RQ3: “How does the degree of CNN complexity impact the performance of classification, regression or segmentation tasks for multispectral satellite imagery?”. Publications are selected from three databases, Web of Science, IEEE Xplore, and Scopus. Based on the obtained results, the main conclusions are: (1) The majority of studies are applied in the field of agriculture and are using Sentinel-2 satellite data; (2) Publications implementing 1D-, 2D-, and 3D-CNNs mostly utilize classification. For 4D-CNN, there are limited number of studies, and all of them use segmentation; (3) This study shows that 2D-CNNs prevail in all application domains, but 3D-CNNs prove to be better for spatio-temporal pattern recognition, more specifically in agricultural and environmental monitoring applications. 1D-CNNs are less common compared to 2D-CNNs and 3D-CNNs, but they show good performance in spectral analysis tasks. 4D-CNNs are more complex and still underutilized, but they have potential for complex data analysis. More details about metrics according to each CNN are provided in the text and supplementary files, offering a comprehensive overview of the evaluation metrics for each type of machine learning technique applied.

Keywords

remote sensingMultiSpectral Images (MSI)satellite imagesConvolutional Neural Networks (CNN)machine learningclassificationregressionsegmentation

Electronic Supplementary Material

Download File(s)
BDMA-2024-0383_ESM.pdf (3.6 MB)

References

[1]
P. Mather and B. Tso, Classification Methods for Remotely Sensed Data. London, UK: CRC Press, 2001.
[2]

Z. Adiri, R. Lhissou, A. El Harti, A. Jellouli, and M. Chakouri, Recent advances in the use of public domain satellite imagery for mineral exploration: A review of landsat-8 and sentinel-2 applications, Ore Geol. Rev., vol. 117, p. 103332, 2020.
Crossref Google Scholar
[3]

A. Jamali and M. Mahdianpari, A cloud-based framework for large-scale monitoring of ocean plastics using multi-spectral satellite imagery and generative adversarial network, Water, vol. 13, no. 18, p. 2553, 2021.
Crossref Google Scholar
[4]

D. Walshe, D. McInerney, R. van de Kerchove, C. Goyens, P. Balaji, and K. A. Byrne, Detecting nutrient deficiency in spruce forests using multispectral satellite imagery, Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinform., vol. 86, p. 101975, 2020.
Google Scholar
[5]

F. Marchese, N. Genzano, M. Neri, A. Falconieri, G. Mazzeo, and N. Pergola, A multi-channel algorithm for mapping volcanic thermal anomalies by means of sentinel-2 MSI and landsat-8 OLI data, Remote Sens., vol. 11, no. 23, p. 2876, 2019.
Crossref Google Scholar
[6]

Z. Yi, L. Jia, and Q. Chen, Crop classification using multi-temporal sentinel-2 data in the Shiyang river basin of China, Remote Sens., vol. 12, no. 24, p. 4052, 2020.
Crossref Google Scholar
[7]

C. Sun, Y. Bian, T. Zhou, and J. Pan, Using of multi-source and multi-temporal remote sensing data improves crop-type mapping in the subtropical agriculture region, Sensors, vol. 19, no. 10, p. 2401, 2019.
Crossref Google Scholar
[8]

P. Lynch, L. Blesius, and E. Hines, Classification of urban area using multispectral indices for urban planning, Remote Sens., vol. 12, no. 15, p. 2503, 2020.
Crossref Google Scholar
[9]

Y. LeCun, Y. Bengio, and G. Hinton, Deep learning, Nature, vol. 521, no. 7553, pp. 436–444, 2015.
Crossref Google Scholar
[10]

L. Li, C. Solana, F. Canters, and M. Kervyn, Testing random forest classification for identifying lava flows and mapping age groups on a single Landsat 8 image, J. Volcanol. Geotherm. Res., vol. 345, pp. 109–124, 2017.
Crossref Google Scholar
[11]
L. Viskovic, I. N. Kosovic, and T. Mastelic, Crop classification using multi-spectral and multitemporal satellite imagery with machine learning, in Proc. 2019 Int. Conf. Software, Telecommunications and Computer Networks, Split, Croatia, 2019, pp. 1–5.
[12]

X. Huang and L. Zhang, An SVM ensemble approach combining spectral, structural, and semantic features for the classification of high-resolution remotely sensed imagery, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens., vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 257–272, 2013.
Crossref Google Scholar
[13]

A. da Penha Pacheco, J. A. da Silva Junior, A. M. Ruiz-Armenteros, and R. F. F. Henriques, Assessment of k-nearest neighbor and random forest classifiers for mapping forest fire areas in central Portugal using landsat-8, sentinel-2, and terra imagery, Remote Sens., vol. 13, no. 7, p. 1345, 2021.
Crossref Google Scholar
[14]

A. Ivanda, L. Šerić, M. Bugarić, and M. Braović, Mapping chlorophyll-a concentrations in the Kaštela bay and Brač channel using ridge regression and sentinel-2 satellite images, Electronics, vol. 10, no. 23, p. 3004, 2021.
Crossref Google Scholar
[15]

P. Das and V. Pandey, Use of logistic regression in land-cover classification with moderate-resolution multispectral data, J. Indian Soc. Remote Sens., vol. 47, no. 8, pp. 1443–1454, 2019.
Crossref Google Scholar
[16]

L. Ma, Y. Liu, X. Zhang, Y. Ye, G. Yin, and B. A. Johnson, Deep learning in remote sensing applications: A meta-analysis and review, ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens., vol. 152, pp. 166–177, 2019.
Crossref Google Scholar
[17]

X. X. Zhu, D. Tuia, L. Mou, G. S. Xia, L. Zhang, F. Xu, and F. Fraundorfer, Deep learning in remote sensing: A comprehensive review and list of resources, IEEE Geosci. Remote Sens. Mag., vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 8–36, 2017.
Crossref Google Scholar
[18]

L. Mou, L. Bruzzone, and X. X. Zhu, Learning spectral-spatial-temporal features via a recurrent convolutional neural network for change detection in multispectral imagery, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens., vol. 57, no. 2, pp. 924–935, 2019.
Crossref Google Scholar
[19]

S. M. Borzov and O. I. Potaturkin, Spectral-spatial methods for hyperspectral image classification. review, Optoelectron. Instrum. Data Process., vol. 54, no. 6, pp. 582–599, 2018.
Crossref Google Scholar
[20]

S. Jia, S. Jiang, Z. Lin, N. Li, M. Xu, and S. Yu, A survey: Deep learning for hyperspectral image classification with few labeled samples, Neurocomputing, vol. 448, pp. 179–204, 2021.
Crossref Google Scholar
[21]

M. J. Khan, H. S. Khan, A. Yousaf, K. Khurshid, and A. Abbas, Modern trends in hyperspectral image analysis: A review, IEEE Access, vol. 6, pp. 14118–14129, 2018.
Crossref Google Scholar
[22]

X. Yuan, J. Shi, and L. Gu, A review of deep learning methods for semantic segmentation of remote sensing imagery, Expert Syst. Appl., vol. 169, p. 114417, 2021.
Crossref Google Scholar
[23]

S. Bera, V. K. Shrivastava, and S. C. Satapathy, Advances in hyperspectral image classification based on convolutional neural networks: A review, CMES Comput. Model. Eng. Sci., vol. 133, no. 2, pp. 219–250, 2022.
Google Scholar
[24]

Y. Li, H. Zhang, X. Xue, Y. Jiang, and Q. Shen, Deep learning for remote sensing image classification: A survey, WIREs Data Min. Knowledge Discovery, vol. 8, no. 6, p. e1264, 2018.
Crossref Google Scholar
[25]

T. Kattenborn, J. Leitloff, F. Schiefer, and S. Hinz, Review on convolutional neural networks (CNN) in vegetation remote sensing, ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens., vol. 173, pp. 24–49, 2021.
Crossref Google Scholar
[26]

L. Zhang, L. Zhang, and B. Du, Deep learning for remote sensing data: A technical tutorial on the state of the art, IEEE Geosci. Remote Sens. Mag., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 22–40, 2016.
Crossref Google Scholar
[27]

J. E. Ball, D. T. Anderson, and C. S. C. Sr, Comprehensive survey of deep learning in remote sensing: Theories, tools, and challenges for the community, J. Appl. Remote Sens., vol. 11, no. 4, p. 042609, 2017.
Google Scholar
[28]

M. J. Page, J. E. McKenzie, P. M. Bossuyt, I. Boutron, T. C. Hoffmann, C. D. Mulrow, L. Shamseer, J. M. Tetzlaff, E. A. Akl, S. E. Brennan, et al., The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews, Int. J. Surg., vol. 88, p. 105906, 2021.
Crossref Google Scholar
[29]
I. Goodfellow, Y. Bengio, and A. Courville, Deep Learning : Convolutional Networks. Cambridge, MA, USA: MIT Press, 2016.
[30]

H. Gu, Y. Wang, S. Hong, and G. Gui, Blind channel identification aided generalized automatic modulation recognition based on deep learning, IEEE Access, vol. 7, pp. 110722–110729, 2019.
Crossref Google Scholar
[31]

L. Alzubaidi, J. Zhang, A. J. Humaidi, A. Al-Dujaili, Y. Duan, O. Al-Shamma, J. Santamaría, M. A. Fadhel, M. Al-Amidie, and L. Farhan, Review of deep learning: Concepts, CNN architectures, challenges, applications, future directions, J. Big Data, vol. 8, no. 1, p. 53, 2021.
Crossref Google Scholar
[32]

W. Hu, Y. Huang, L. Wei, F. Zhang, and H. Li, Deep convolutional neural networks for hyperspectral image classification, J. Sens., vol. 2015, p. 258619, 2015.
Google Scholar
[33]

S. Ojaghi, Y. Bouroubi, S. Foucher, M. Bergeron, and C. Seynat, Deep learning-based emulation of radiative transfer models for top-of-atmosphere BRDF modelling using sentinel-3 OLCI, Remote Sens., vol. 15, no. 3, p. 835, 2023.
Crossref Google Scholar
[34]

L. P. Osco, Q. Wu, E. L. de Lemos, W. N. Gonçalves, A. P. M. Ramos, J. Li, and J. Marcato Junior, The segment anything model (SAM) for remote sensing applications: From zero to one shot, Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinform., vol. 124, p. 103540, 2023.
Google Scholar
[35]
M. G. Park and N. W. Park, Application of deep learning algorithms considering spatio-temporal features for crop classification, in Proc. 40 th Asian Conf. Remote Sensing, Daejeon, Republic of Korea, 2019, http://acrs2019. sigongji.com/wp/pdf/ThP-87.pdf, 2023.
[36]
X. Zhou, W. Zhou, F. Li, Z. Shao, and X. Fu, Vegetation type classification based on 3D convolutional neural network model: A case study of Baishuijiang national nature reserve, Forests, vol. 13, no. 6, p. 906, 2022.
[37]

S. M. M. Nejad, D. Abbasi-Moghadam, A. Sharifi, N. Farmonov, K. Amankulova, and M. Lászlź, Multispectral crop yield prediction using 3D-convolutional neural networks and attention convolutional LSTM approaches, IEEE J. Sel. Top. Appl. Earth Obs. Remote Sens., vol. 16, pp. 254–266, 2023.
Crossref Google Scholar
[38]
S. Ji, C. Zhang, A. Xu, Y. Shi, and Y. Duan, 3D convolutional neural networks for crop classification with multi-temporal remote sensing images, Remote Sens., vol. 10, no. 1, p. 75, 2018.
[39]
M. Giannopoulos, G. Tsagkatakis, and P. Tsakalides, 4D U-Nets for multi-temporal remote sensing data classification, Remote Sens., vol. 14, no. 3, p. 634, 2022.
[40]
M. Abadi, A. Agarwal, P. Barham, E. Brevdo, Z. Chen, C. Citro, G. S. Corrado, A. Davis, J. Dean, M. Devin, et al., TensorFlow: Large-scale machine learning on heterogeneous distributed systems, arXiv preprint arXiv: 1603.04467, 2016.
[41]
A. Paszke, S. Gross, F. Massa, A. Lerer, J. Bradbury, G. Chanan, T. Killeen, Z. Lin, N. Gimelshein, L. Antiga, et al., PyTorch: An imperative style, high-performance deep learning library, in Proc. 33 rd Conf. Neural Information Processing Systems, Vancouver, Canada, 2019, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.1912.01703.
[42]
M. Giannopoulos, G. Tsagkatakis, and P. Tsakalides, 4D convolutional neural networks for multi-spectral and multi-temporal remote sensing data classification, in Proc. 2022 IEEE Int. Conf. Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, Singapore, 2022, pp. 1541–1545.
[43]
E. O. Box and K. Fujiwara, Vegetation types and their broad-scale distribution, in Vegetation Ecology, E. van der Maarel and J. Franklin, eds, 2nd ed. Chichester, England: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., 2013, pp. 455–485.
[44]

M. Weiss, F. Jacob, and G. Duveiller, Remote sensing for agricultural applications: A meta-review, Remote Sens. Environ., vol. 236, p. 111402, 2020.
Crossref Google Scholar
[45]

D. Phiri, M. Simwanda, S. Salekin, V. R. Nyirenda, Y. Murayama, and M. Ranagalage, Sentinel-2 data for land cover/use mapping: A review, Remote Sens., vol. 12, no. 14, p. 2291, 2020.
Crossref Google Scholar
[46]

D. P. Roy, M. A. Wulder, T. R. Loveland, C. E. Woodcock, R. G. Allen, M. C. Anderson, D. Helder, J. R. Irons, D. M. Johnson, R. Kennedy, et al., Landsat-8: Science and product vision for terrestrial global change research, Remote Sens. Environ., vol. 145, pp. 154–172, 2014.
Crossref Google Scholar
[47]

A. Savtchenko, D. Ouzounov, S. Ahmad, J. Acker, G. Leptoukh, J. Koziana, and D. Nickless, Terra and aqua MODIS products available from NASA GES DAAC, Adv. Space Res., vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 710–714, 2004.
Crossref Google Scholar
[48]

Y. Chen, L. Tang, Z. Kan, A. Latif, X. Yang, M. Bilal, and Q. Li, Cloud and cloud shadow detection based on multiscale 3D-CNN for high resolution multispectral imagery, IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 16505–16516, 2020.
Crossref Google Scholar
[49]

Q. Zhang, Q. Yuan, Z. Li, F. Sun, and L. Zhang, Combined deep prior with low-rank tensor SVD for thick cloud removal in multitemporal images, ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens., vol. 177, pp. 161–173, 2021.
Crossref Google Scholar
[50]

H. Jiang and N. Lu, Multi-scale residual convolutional neural network for haze removal of remote sensing images, Remote Sens., vol. 10, no. 6, p. 945, 2018.
Crossref Google Scholar
[51]

F. Kong, K. Hu, Y. Li, D. Li, and S. Zhao, Spectral-spatial feature partitioned extraction based on CNN for multispectral image compression, Remote Sens., vol. 13, no. 1, p. 9, 2021.
Google Scholar
[52]
Z. Zhu, Y. Tao, and X. Luo, HCNNet: A hybrid convolutional neural network for spatiotemporal image fusion, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens., vol. 60, p. 2005716, 2022.
[53]

X. Zhao, Y. Ma, Y. Xiao, J. Liu, J. Ding, X. Ye, and R. Liu, Atmospheric correction algorithm based on deep learning with spatial-spectral feature constraints for broadband optical satellites: Examples from the HY-1C coastal zone imager, ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens., vol. 205, pp. 147–162, 2023.
Crossref Google Scholar
[54]
A. B. Molini, D. Valsesia, G. Fracastoro, and E. Magli, Deep learning for super-resolution of unregistered multi-temporal satellite images, in Proc. 2019 10 th Workshop on Hyperspectral Imaging and Signal Processing : Evolution in Remote Sensing, Amsterdam, the Netherlands, 2019, pp. 1–5.
[55]

F. Salvetti, V. Mazzia, A. Khaliq, and M. Chiaberge, Multi-image super resolution of remotely sensed images using residual attention deep neural networks, Remote Sens., vol. 12, no. 14, p. 2207, 2020.
Crossref Google Scholar
[56]

F. Dorr, Satellite image multi-frame super resolution using 3D wide-activation neural networks, Remote Sens., vol. 12, no. 22, p. 3812, 2020.
Crossref Google Scholar
[57]
M. R. Ibrahim, R. Benavente, F. Lumbreras, and D. Ponsa, 3DRRDB: Super resolution of multiple remote sensing images using 3D residual in residual dense blocks, in Proc. 2022 IEEE/CVF Conf. Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, New Orleans, LA, USA, 2022, pp. 322–331.
[58]
N. Li, R. Wang, H. Zhao, and W. Wei, An improved feature extraction method based on context features for multi-spectral remote sensing imagery, in Proc. 2019 IEEE Int. Conf. Signal, Information and Data Processing, Chongqing, China, 2019, pp. 1–4.
[59]

S. He, R. Zhou, S. Li, S. Jiang, and W. Jiang, Disparity estimation of high-resolution remote sensing images with dual-scale matching network, Remote Sens., vol. 13, no. 24, p. 5050, 2021.
Crossref Google Scholar
[60]
T. Igeta and A. Iwasaki, An unsupervised network for stereo matching of very high resolution satellite imagery, in Proc. 2022 IEEE Int. Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symp., Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 2022, pp. 971–974.
[61]

L. Wang, X. Wang, Z. Zhao, Y. Wu, J. Xu, H. Zhang, J. Yu, Q. Sun, and Y. Bai, Multi-factor status prediction by 4D fractal CNN based on remote sensing images, Fractals, vol. 30, no. 2, p. 2240101, 2022.
Crossref Google Scholar
[62]
A. D. Gordon, Classification. New York, NY, USA: CRC Press, 1999.
[63]
J. Al-Doski, S. B. Mansorl, and H. Z. M. Shafri, Image classification in remote sensing, J. Environ. and Earth Sci., http://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/234663192.pdf, 2023.
[64]

M. Hossin and M. N. Sulaiman, A review on evaluation metrics for data classification evaluations, Int. J. Data Min. Knowl. Manage. Process, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 1–11, 2015.
Crossref Google Scholar
[65]
N. Japkowicz and M. Shah, Evaluating Learning Algorithms : A Classification Perspective. New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press, 2011.
[66]
C. J. F. T. Braak and C. W. N. Looman, Regression, in Data Analysis in Community and Landscape Ecology, R. H. Jongman, C. J. F. ter Braak, and O. F. R. van Tongeren, eds. New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press, 1995, pp. 29–77.
[67]

A. V. Tatachar, Comparative assessment of regression models based on model evaluation metrics, Int. Res. J. Eng. Technol., vol. 8, no. 9, pp. 853–860, 2021.
Google Scholar
[68]

S. Jeong, J. Ko, and J. M. Yeom, Predicting rice yield at pixel scale through synthetic use of crop and deep learning models with satellite data in south and North Korea, Sci. Total Environ., vol. 802, p. 149726, 2022.
Crossref Google Scholar
[69]

F. Sabo, M. Meroni, F. Waldner, and F. Rembold, Is deeper always better? Evaluating deep learning models for yield forecasting with small data, Environ. Monit. Assess., vol. 195, no. 10, p. 1153, 2023.
Crossref Google Scholar
[70]

Z. Xu, H. Sun, T. Zhang, H. Xu, D. Wu, and J. Gao, Evaluating established deep learning methods in constructing integrated remote sensing drought index: A case study in China, Agric. Water Manage., vol. 286, p. 108405, 2023.
Crossref Google Scholar
[71]

S. Vulova, F. Meier, A. D. Rocha, J. Quanz, H. Nouri, and B. Kleinschmit, Modeling urban evapotranspiration using remote sensing, flux footprints, and artificial intelligence, Sci. Total Environ., vol. 786, p. 147293, 2021.
Crossref Google Scholar
[72]

X. Zhou, Q. Xin, Y. Dai, and W. Li, A deep-learning-based experiment for benchmarking the performance of global terrestrial vegetation phenology models, Global Ecol. Biogeogr., vol. 30, no. 11, pp. 2178–2199, 2021.
Crossref Google Scholar
[73]
M. Fathi, R. Shah-Hosseini, and A. Moghimi, 3D-ResNet-BILSTM model: A deep learning model for county-level soybean yield prediction with time-series sentinel-1, sentinel-2 imagery, and daymet data, Remote Sens., vol. 15, no. 23, p. 5551, 2023.
[74]

P. M. Maier, S. Keller, and S. Hinz, Deep learning with WASI simulation data for estimating chlorophyll a concentration of inland water bodies, Remote Sens., vol. 13, no. 4, p. 718, 2021.
Crossref Google Scholar
[75]
D. Fan, H. He, R. Wang, Y. Zeng, B. Fu, Y. Xiong, L. Liu, Y. Xu, and E. Gao, CHLNET: A novel hybrid 1D CNN-SVR algorithm for estimating ocean surface chlorophyll-a, Front. Mar. Sci., vol. 9, p. 934536, 2022.
[76]

S. S. Mukonza and J. L. Chiang, Micro-climate computed machine and deep learning models for prediction of surface water temperature using satellite data in Mundan water reservoir, Water, vol. 14, no. 18, p. 2935, 2022.
Crossref Google Scholar
[77]
M. Salah, H. Higa, J. Ishizaka, and S. I. Salem, 1D convolutional neural network-based chlorophyll-a retrieval algorithm for sentinel-2 multispectral instrument in various trophic states, Sens. Mater., vol. 35, no. 11, pp. 3743–3761, 2023.
[78]

A. Ivanda, L. Šerića, D. Žagar, and K. Oštir, An application of 1D convolution and deep learning to remote sensing modelling of secchi depth in the northern Adriatic sea, Big Earth Data, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 82–114, 2024.
Crossref Google Scholar
[79]

Y. Zeng, T. Liang, D. Fan, and H. He, A novel algorithm for the retrieval of chlorophyll a in marine environments using deep learning, Water, vol. 15, no. 21, p. 3864, 2023.
Crossref Google Scholar
[80]
M. Salah, H. Higa, J. Ishizaka, and S. I. Salem, B1D-CNN: A novel convolution neural network-based chlorophyll-a retrieval algorithm for sentinel-2 data, in Proc. 2023 IEEE Int. Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symp., Pasadena, CA, USA, 2023, pp. 3950–3953.
[81]

V. Sagan, M. Maimaitijiang, S. Bhadra, M. Maimaitiyiming, D. R. Brown, P. Sidike, and F. B. Fritschi, Field-scale crop yield prediction using multi-temporal worldview-3 and planetscope satellite data and deep learning, ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens., vol. 174, pp. 265–281, 2021.
Crossref Google Scholar
[82]

J. Lee, J. Im, D. H. Cha, H. Park, and S. Sim, Tropical cyclone intensity estimation using multi-dimensional convolutional neural networks from geostationary satellite data, Remote Sens., vol. 12, no. 1, p. 108, 2020.
Google Scholar
[83]

J. Zhong, J. Sun, Z. Lai, and Y. Song, Nearshore bathymetry from icesat-2 lidar and sentinel-2 imagery datasets using deep learning approach, Remote Sens., vol. 14, no. 17, p. 4229, 2022.
Crossref Google Scholar
[84]

M. Papadomanolaki, S. Christodoulidis, K. Karantzalos, and M. Vakalopoulou, Unsupervised multistep deformable registration of remote sensing imagery based on deep learning, Remote Sens., vol. 13, no. 7, p. 1294, 2021.
Crossref Google Scholar
[85]
E. Zhang, Y. Fu, J. Wang, L. Liu, K. Yu, and J. Peng, MSAC-Net: 3D multi-scale attention convolutional network for multi-spectral imagery pansharpening, Remote Sens., vol. 14, no. 12, p. 2761, 2022.
[86]

Z. Wang, S. Fang, and J. Zhang, Spatiotemporal fusion model of remote sensing images combining single-band and multi-band prediction, Remote Sens., vol. 15, no. 20, p. 4936, 2023.
Crossref Google Scholar
[87]
A. S. Terliksiz and D. T. Altýlar, Use of deep neural networks for crop yield prediction: A case study of soybean yield in lauderdale county, Alabama, USA, in Proc. 2019 8 th Int. Conf. Agro-Geoinformatics, Istanbul, Turkey, 2019, pp. 1–4.
[88]

M. Qiao, X. He, X. Cheng, P. Li, H. Luo, L. Zhang, and Z. Tian, Crop yield prediction from multi-spectral, multi-temporal remotely sensed imagery using recurrent 3D convolutional neural networks, Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinform., vol. 102, p. 102436, 2021.
Google Scholar
[89]
N. Wang, Z. Ma, P. Huo, and X. Liu, Predicting crop yield using 3D convolutional neural network with dimension reduction and metric learning, in Proc. 2023 IEEE 6 th Int. Conf. Pattern Recognition and Artificial Intelligence, Haikou, China, 2023, pp. 1004–1008.
[90]
N. Wang, Z. Ma, P. Huo, X. Liu, Z. He, and K. Lu, 3D convolutional neural network with dimension reduction and metric learning for crop yield prediction based on remote sensing data, Appl. Sci., vol. 13, no. 24, p. 13305, 2023.
[91]

R. Fernandez-Beltran, T. Baidar, J. Kang, and F. Pla, Rice-yield prediction with multi-temporal sentinel-2 data and 3D CNN: A case study in Nepal, Remote Sens., vol. 13, no. 7, p. 1391, 2021.
Crossref Google Scholar
[92]

T. Fei, B. Huang, X. Wang, J. Zhu, Y. Chen, H. Wang, and W. Zhang, A hybrid deep learning model for the bias correction of SST numerical forecast products using satellite data, Remote Sens., vol. 14, no. 6, p. 1339, 2022.
Crossref Google Scholar
[93]

L. Wang, W. Li, X. Wang, and J. Xu, Remote sensing image analysis and prediction based on improved Pix2Pix model for water environment protection of smart cities, PeerJ Comput. Sci., vol. 9, p. e1292, 2023.
Crossref Google Scholar
[94]

G. Chen, Q. Pei, and M. Kamruzzaman, Remote sensing image quality evaluation based on deep support value learning networks, Signal Process Image Commun., vol. 83, p. 115783, 2020.
Crossref Google Scholar
[95]

L. Zhang, P. Liu, L. Wang, J. Liu, B. Song, Y. Zhang, G. He, and H. Zhang, Improved 1-km-resolution hourly estimates of aerosol optical depth using conditional generative adversarial networks, Remote Sens., vol. 13, no. 19, p. 3834, 2021.
Crossref Google Scholar
[96]

D. Kaur and Y. Kaur, Various image segmentation techniques: A review, Int. J. Comput. Sci. Mobile Comput., vol. 3, no. 5, pp. 809–814, 2014.
Google Scholar
[97]
V. Dey, Y. Zhang, and M. Zhong, A review on image segmentation techniques with remote sensing perspective, in Proc. of the International Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing Symposium, https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:19014182, 2023.
[98]
G. Bahl and F. Lafarge, Scanner neural network for on-board segmentation of satellite images, in Proc. 2022 IEEE Int. Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symp., Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 2022, pp. 3504–3507.
[99]

H. Ghandorh, W. Boulila, S. Masood, A. Koubaa, F. Ahmed, and J. Ahmad, Semantic segmentation and edge detection—approach to road detection in very high resolution satellite images, Remote Sens., vol. 14, no. 3, p. 613, 2022.
Crossref Google Scholar
[100]

R. Li, S. Zheng, C. Duan, L. Wang, and C. Zhang, Land cover classification from remote sensing images based on multi-scale fully convolutional network, Geo-Spat. Inf. Sci., vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 278–294, 2022.
Crossref Google Scholar
[101]

E. Saralioglu and O. Gungor, Semantic segmentation of land cover from high resolution multispectral satellite images by spectral-spatial convolutional neural network, Geocarto Int., vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 657–677, 2022.
Crossref Google Scholar
[102]
S. Mohammadi, M. Belgiu, and A. Stein, 3D fully convolutional neural networks with intersection over union loss for crop mapping from multi-temporal satellite images, in Proc. 2021 IEEE Int. Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symp., Brussels, Belgium, 2021, pp. 5834–5837.
[103]

I. Gallo, L. Ranghetti, N. Landro, R. L. Grassa, and M. Boschetti, In-season and dynamic crop mapping using 3D convolution neural networks and sentinel-2 time series, ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens., vol. 195, pp. 335–352, 2023.
Crossref Google Scholar
[104]

S. Mohammadi, M. Belgiu, and A. Stein, Improvement in crop mapping from satellite image time series by effectively supervising deep neural networks, J. Photogramm. Remote Sens., vol. 198, pp. 272–283, 2023.
Crossref Google Scholar
[105]

E. Kalinicheva, J. Sublime, and M. Trocan, Unsupervised satellite image time series clustering using object-based approaches and 3D convolutional autoencoder, Remote Sens., vol. 12, no. 11, p. 1816, 2020.
Crossref Google Scholar
[106]
K. Meshkini, F. Bovolo, and L. Bruzzone, An unsupervised change detection approach for dense satellite image time series using 3D CNN, in Proc. 2021 IEEE Int. Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symp., Brussels, Belgium, 2021, pp. 4336–4339.
[107]
K. Meshkini, F. Bovolo, L. Bruzzone, A 3D CNN approach for change detection in HR satellite image time series based on a pretrained 2D CNN, in Proc. Int. Archives of the Photogrammetry Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Nice, France, 2022, doi: 10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B3-2022-143-2022.
[108]

M. R. Rahman and S. K. Saha, Multi-resolution segmentation for object-based classification and accuracy assessment of land use/land cover classification using remotely sensed data, J. Indian Soc. Remote Sens., vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 189–201, 2008.
Crossref Google Scholar
[109]

S. Park and N. W. Park, Effects of class purity of training patch on classification performance of crop classification with convolutional neural network, Appl. Sci., vol. 10, no. 11, p. 3773, 2020.
Crossref Google Scholar
Big Data Mining and Analytics
Volume 8 Issue 2,
April 2025
Pages 407-429
DOI: 10.26599/BDMA.2024.9020086
Cite this article:
Ivanda A, Šerić L, Braović M. Exploring Applications of Convolutional Neural Networks in Analyzing Multispectral Satellite Imagery: A Systematic Review. Big Data Mining and Analytics, 2025, 8(2): 407-429. https://doi.org/10.26599/BDMA.2024.9020086

413

Views

43

Downloads

0

Crossref

0

Web of Science

0

Scopus

0

CSCD

Altmetrics
Received: 13 August 2024
Revised: 12 October 2024
Accepted: 28 October 2024
Published: 29 January 2025
© The author(s) 2025.

The articles published in this open access journal are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Return