AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (730.4 KB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Open Access

Optimal Dependence of Performance and Efficiency of Collaborative Filtering on Random Stratified Subsampling

Department of Computational Data Science and Engineering, North Carolina A&T State University, Greensboro, NC 27401, USA
Show Author Information

Abstract

Dropping fractions of users or items judiciously can reduce the computational cost of Collaborative Filtering (CF) algorithms. The effect of this subsampling on the computing time and accuracy of CF is not fully understood, and clear guidelines for selecting optimal or even appropriate subsampling levels are not available. In this paper, we present a Density-based Random Stratified Subsampling using Clustering (DRSC) algorithm in which the desired Fraction of Users Dropped (FUD) and Fraction of Items Dropped (FID) are specified, and the overall density during subsampling is maintained. Subsequently, we develop simple models of the Training Time Improvement (TTI) and the Accuracy Loss (AL) as functions of FUD and FID, based on extensive simulations of seven standard CF algorithms as applied to various primary matrices from MovieLens, Yahoo Music Rating, and Amazon Automotive data. Simulations show that both TTI and a scaled AL are bi-linear in FID and FUD for all seven methods. The TTI linear regression of a CF method appears to be same for all datasets. Extensive simulations illustrate that TTI can be estimated reliably with FUD and FID only, but AL requires considering additional dataset characteristics. The derived models are then used to optimize the levels of subsampling addressing the tradeoff between TTI and AL. A simple sub-optimal approximation was found, in which the optimal AL is proportional to the optimal Training Time Reduction Factor (TTRF) for higher values of TTRF, and the optimal subsampling levels, like optimal FID/(1-FID), are proportional to the square root of TTRF.

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
Big Data Mining and Analytics
Pages 192-205

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
Poudel S, Bikdash M. Optimal Dependence of Performance and Efficiency of Collaborative Filtering on Random Stratified Subsampling. Big Data Mining and Analytics, 2022, 5(3): 192-205. https://doi.org/10.26599/BDMA.2021.9020032

1845

Views

122

Downloads

15

Crossref

8

Web of Science

14

Scopus

1

CSCD

Received: 27 July 2021
Revised: 07 December 2021
Accepted: 31 December 2021
Published: 09 June 2022
© The author(s) 2022.

The articles published in this open access journal are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).