AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (2.3 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Original Research | Open Access

Ultrasound Viscoelasticity for Breast Tumor: High Diagnostic Performance at the Peritumoral Boundary

Junni Shi1, Jiatong Xu1, Chuanjian Chen, Guanghua Xiang, Wen Zheng, Man Chen( )
Department of Ultrasound, Tong Ren Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China

Junni Shi and Jiatong Xu contributed equally to this study.

Show Author Information

Abstract

Objectives

Conventional ultrasound (US) elastography lacks specificity in distinguishing benign from malignant breast lesions. This study employed US to assess breast tissue viscosity and elasticity. The primary objective was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of US-derived viscoelasticity parameters. Secondary objectives included investigating the consistency of parameters in the mechanical properties of breast tissue.

Materials and methods

Two doctors independently measured the viscosity and elasticity of specific positions in the breasts of 20 health females for consistency assessment. Then the doctors selected region of interest (ROI) to measure viscoelasticity. ROI-1, ROI-2, and ROI-3 represent the tumor, peritumoral, and peripheral areas, respectively. The viscosity modulus and elasticity modulus of 3 ROIs were analyzed. The viscosity and elasticity parameters with the highest area under the curve (AUC) were selected as the optimal ones. Finally, elasticity and viscosity parameters were combined to assess their diagnostic performance in differentiating breast lesions.

Results

US viscoelasticity parameters can be measured with high consistency. Among conventional US elasticity parameters, 1-Emax demonstrated the highest AUC (0.746) for differentiating benign and malignant breast lesions. In US viscoelasticity parameters, 2-Emax achieved the highest AUC of 0.801, while 2-Vmax showed the highest AUC of 0.835. The highest specificity (0.903) was observed when both 2-Emax and 2-Vmax exceeded their respective cutoff values (P < 0.05 for all).

Conclusion

Quantitative ultrasound viscoelasticity parameters play a crucial role in breast cancer diagnosis, with tumor boundary parameters being particularly significant for cancer screening and prevention strategies.

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
Advanced Ultrasound in Diagnosis and Therapy
Pages 270-276

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
Shi J, Xu J, Chen C, et al. Ultrasound Viscoelasticity for Breast Tumor: High Diagnostic Performance at the Peritumoral Boundary. Advanced Ultrasound in Diagnosis and Therapy, 2025, 9(3): 270-276. https://doi.org/10.26599/AUDT.2025.250075

2081

Views

150

Downloads

1

Crossref

1

Scopus

Received: 15 December 2024
Revised: 14 February 2025
Accepted: 04 March 2025
Published: 01 September 2025
2576-2508/© AUDT 2025

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium provided that the original work is properly attributed