AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (8.3 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Research Article | Open Access

Safety and efficacy of low-density lipoprotein-lowering drugs in the elderly: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Karmenia Jessica Kurnia Niaga1( )Pedro Arruda Supinto2Kevin Christian Tjandra3Alfianto Martin4Clement Drew5K Heri Nugroho Hario Seno6 Felix1Laksmana Adi Krista Nugraha3Ferdy Tantowi1
Faculty of Medicine, Tarumanagara University, Jakarta, Indonesia
Faculty of Medicine and Health Science, Atma Jaya Catholic University, Jakarta, Indonesia
Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Diponegoro University, Semarang, Indonesia
Department of Internal Medicine, Tarumanagara University, Jakarta, Indonesia
Department of Public Health, Tarumanagara University, Jakarta, Indonesia
Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Department of Internal Medicine, Diponegoro University, Kariadi Semarang, Indonesia
Show Author Information

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Balancing the efficacy of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) reduction with safety presents a significant challenge in the elderly care. While guidelines recommended high-intensity statins as the optimal strategy to lower LDL in high-risk individuals, there are prevailing concerns regarding its side effects and subsequent fatality rate. The effectiveness of different LDL-lowering therapies in this population is also unclear. This study aims to compare the safety and efficacy of various LDL-lowering strategies in elderly population.

METHODS

A systematic search was conducted through six databases until March 2025. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that evaluate LDL-lowering agents were included. The primary outcome was adverse effects, while secondary outcomes included composite cardiovascular disease (CVD) events, CVD related mortality, all-cause mortality, and LDL level reduction. Risk of bias was assessed using the RoB-2 tool. A network meta-analyses were performed to compare the safety and efficacy with subgroup analysis based on underlying CVD under the cumulative ranking values.

RESULTS

Sixteen RCTs (n = 43,625) with low to moderate risk of bias were included. Among interventions evaluated for adverse events, moderate-intensity pitavastatin had the highest probability of being the safest. Ezetimibe demonstrated the most favorable safety profile for reducing CVD mortality, while evolocumab was most effective in lowering all-cause mortality. For LDL reduction, the combination of moderate-intensity pitavastatin and ezetimibe was the most effective, followed by moderate-intensity rosuvastatin plus ezetimibe. Subgroup analyses revealed significant differences between CVD and non-CVD populations in CVD mortality (P = 0.0059), CVD events (P = 0.0096), and LDL reduction (P = 0.0100), with more pronounced effects in the non-CVD group, suggesting greater efficacy in primary prevention.

CONCLUSIONS

Moderate-intensity pitavastatin showed the highest safety profile, while its combination with ezetimibe was the most effective for LDL reduction.

Electronic Supplementary Material

Download File(s)
JGC-202512-048-R1_ESM.pdf (143.8 KB)

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
Journal of Geriatric Cardiology
Pages 515-528

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
Niaga KJK, Supinto PA, Tjandra KC, et al. Safety and efficacy of low-density lipoprotein-lowering drugs in the elderly: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Journal of Geriatric Cardiology, 2026, 23(8): 515-528. https://doi.org/10.26599/1671-5411.2026.08.004

52

Views

11

Downloads

0

Crossref

0

Web of Science

0

Scopus

0

CSCD

Published: 21 September 2026
© 2026 JGC All rights reserved

This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.