AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (8.3 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Research Article | Open Access

Frailty scale with the best prediction of mortality in individuals diagnosed with acute coronary syndrome: systematic review and meta-analysis

Letycia Netto de Paula Cunha1( )Samara Vieira de Oliveira2Taline Lazzarin1Lara Lívia Santos da Silva2Marcos Ferreira Minicucci1Nara Aline Costa2
Faculty of Medicine, Botucatu Medical School, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Botucatu, São Paulo, Brazil
Faculty of Nutrition, Federal University of Goiás (UFG), Goiânia, Goiás, Brazil
Show Author Information

Abstract

Background

Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS) is a major cause of hospitalizations and deaths worldwide. Conditions such as frailty worsen these outcomes. Frailty assessment improves risk stratification, complements scores and favors personalized treatments. However, there are numerous tools available for assessing frailty, and there is still no consensus on which would be the most recommended in conditions such as ACS. The objective was to evaluate which frailty diagnostic scale has the best predictive value for mortality in individuals with ACS.

Methods

This meta-analysis was conducted using Medline, Embase, and Cochrane, with a search conducted on March 5, 2024. Studies that met the PECOS criteria were included: adult and elderly individuals diagnosed with ACS, frailty assessment determined by a scale, mortality registry and intervention studies or prospective and retrospective cohorts. The risk of bias and quality of evidence were assessed by two researchers using the Joana Briggs Institute Case Series tool and the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE) system, respectively. The meta-analysis was conducted using Review Manager software and subgroup analyses using R software.

Results

The results of the meta-analysis indicate that frailty is associated with a significantly higher risk of mortality in patients with ACS (P < 0.001). However, the results of the meta-regression did not indicate a significant difference between the five scales evaluated (P = 0.227). The choice of scale, therefore, can be based on other factors such as practicality and availability of resources, without compromising the prognosis.

Conclusion

Individuals with ACS and frailty have a higher chance of mortality, and all scales evaluated showed good predictive value, with no statistical difference. We suggest that the Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) is suitable for hospital settings and acute conditions, such as ACS.

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
Journal of Geriatric Cardiology
Pages 173-183

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
Cunha LNdP, Oliveira SVd, Lazzarin T, et al. Frailty scale with the best prediction of mortality in individuals diagnosed with acute coronary syndrome: systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Geriatric Cardiology, 2026, 23(3): 173-183. https://doi.org/10.26599/1671-5411.2026.03.004

351

Views

17

Downloads

0

Crossref

0

Web of Science

0

Scopus

0

CSCD

Published: 14 May 2026
© 2026 JGC All rights reserved

This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.