AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (2 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Research Article | Open Access

Age-specific outcomes after transcatheter left atrial appendage occlusion with the watchman device

Ritu Yadav1Sia Savant2Meghana Prakash2H. Waraich2Abhishek C. Sawant2( )
Midwestern University GME Consortium/Verde Valley Medical Center
Structural Heart and Interventional Cardiology, University of Arizona School of Medicine, DHMG Cardiology- Chandler, Chandler, USA
Show Author Information

Abstract

Background

Transcatheter left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) has become a suitable alternative to anticoagulation in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). However, outcomes among patients age > 75 years undergoing LAAO are lacking.

Methods

We included 723 consecutive patients with AF undergoing LAAO from August 2015 to March 2020. Patient data including clinical, laboratory, procedural characteristics, medications and outcomes were collected. The primary composite outcome was major adverse cardiac events (MACE) including mortality, stroke, bleeding and readmissions at 60-days.

Results

Mean age was 75 ± 8 years and 434 (60%) were males. Median CHA2DS2-VASc score was 4 (IQR: 4, 5) points and median HASBLED score was 4 (IQR: 3, 4) points. Composite MACE outcome was significantly higher among patients age > 75 years in both unadjusted (17.1% vs. 11.5%, P = 0.03) and adjusted (Odds Ratio = 1.59, 95% CI: 1.02 – 2.46, P = 0.04) analysis. Composite MACE was primarily driven by higher all-cause mortality (1.3% vs. 0, P = 0.04) among patients age > 75 years. The secondary outcome of procedural success was also lower among patients age > 75 years (92.2% vs. 96.2%, P = 0.02). The occurrence of stroke (P = 0.38), major bleeding (P = 0.29) and readmissions (P = 0.15) did not differ between patients age > 75 years and less than 75 years.

Conclusion

Patients age >75 years undergoing LAAO have worse outcomes primarily driven by higher all-cause mortality and are less likely to achieve procedural success. Future prospective studies evaluating these findings are warranted.

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
Journal of Geriatric Cardiology
Pages 648-655

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
Yadav R, Savant S, Prakash M, et al. Age-specific outcomes after transcatheter left atrial appendage occlusion with the watchman device. Journal of Geriatric Cardiology, 2025, 22(7): 648-655. https://doi.org/10.26599/1671-5411.2025.07.007

1784

Views

114

Downloads

0

Crossref

0

Web of Science

0

Scopus

0

CSCD

Published: 01 September 2025
© 2025 JGC All rights reserved

This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.