AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (2 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Research Article | Open Access

Geriatric assessment for predicting outcomes among patients with aortic stenosis undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation

Calvo E1,2,3,4( ), Castillo P1, Romaguera R1,3,5, Llaó I1, Zafrilla R1, Domene G1, Alegre O1,5, Lorente V1,5, Muntané-Carol G1,3,5, Formiga F6, de la Cuerda FJ1,5, Gomez Hospital JA1,3,5,7, Ariza-Solè A1,5,7
Department of Cardiology, Bellvitge University Hospital, Spain
Faculty of nursing, University of Barcelona, Spain
Ciber cardiovascular group (CIBER-CV), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Spain
Nursing research group (GRIN) from the Bellvitge Institute of Biomedical Research (IDIBELL), Spain
BIO-HEART, Cardiovascular Diseases Research Group Group from the Bellvitge Institute of Biomedical Research (IDIBELL), Spain
Geriatric Unit. Internal Medicine, Bellvitge University Hospital, Spain
Faculty of Medicine, University of Barcelona, Spain
Show Author Information

Abstract

Background

There is scarce data about comparisons between geriatric assessment tools in patients with aortic stenosis (AS). We aimed to describe the geriatric profile of patients with AS undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) and to analyze the ability of different tools for predicting clinical outcomes in this context.

Methods

This was a single center retrospective registry including patients with AS undergoing TAVI and surviving to hospital discharge. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality or need for urgent readmission one year after TAVI.

Results

A total of 377 patients were included (mean age of 80.4 years). Most patients were independent or mildly dependent, with an optimal cognitive status. The proportion of frailty ranged from 17.6% to 49.8%. A total of 20 patients (5.3%) died and 110/377 patients (29.2%) died or were readmitted during follow up. Overall, most components of the geriatric assessment showed an association with clinical outcomes. Disability for instrumental activities showed a significant association with mortality and a strong association with the rate of mortality or readmission. The association between frailty and clinical outcomes was higher for short physical performance battery (SPPB), essential frailty toolset (EFT) and the frailty index based on comprehensive geriatric assessment (IF-VIG) and lower for Fried criteria and FRAIL scale.

Conclusions

AS patients from this series presented a good physical performance, optimal cognitive status and a reasonably low prevalence of frailty. The best predictive ability was observed for disability for instrumental activities and frailty as measured by the EFT, SPPB and the IF-VIG.

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
Journal of Geriatric Cardiology
Pages 516-524

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
E C, P C, R R, et al. Geriatric assessment for predicting outcomes among patients with aortic stenosis undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Journal of Geriatric Cardiology, 2025, 22(5): 516-524. https://doi.org/10.26599/1671-5411.2025.05.005

1317

Views

151

Downloads

3

Crossref

1

Web of Science

1

Scopus

1

CSCD

Published: 25 June 2025
© 2025 JGC All rights reserved

This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.