AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (2.4 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Review | Open Access

TAVR in older adults with cardiogenic shock: current practice and future direction

Min Ji Kwak1,2, Jorge A. Irizarry-Caro2, Paola Rodriguez Martinez2, James Going2, Jessica Lee1,2, Dana Giza1,2, Nuzah Amjad1,2, Ana Leech1,2, Rachel Jantea1,2, Renee Flores1,2, Nahid Rianon1,2, Abhijeet Dhoble2,3( )
Division of Geriatric and Palliative Medicine, McGovern Medical School, TX, USA
Department of Internal Medicine, McGovern Medical School, TX, USA
Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, McGovern Medical School, TX, USA
Show Author Information

Abstract

Aortic stenosis (AS) is one of the most common types of valvular heart disease in older adults, with age being significantly associated with the development of AS. The transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) procedure, since it was first performed in 2002, has emerged as a preferred treatment option for patients who are at intermediate to high surgical risk due to advanced age or medical comorbidities. Older adults with severe AS may present with acute decompensated heart failure leading to cardiogenic shock (CS). Among patients 65 years and older with AS presenting for TAVR, 4.1% were reportedly in acute CS. Regardless of etiology, mortality from CS itself is high (30%−50%) and increases with advancing age. TAVR for these patients could provide a definite treatment for both AS and CS. There is still limited evidence regarding the safety and efficacy of TAVR in this population, but recent studies are promising, with successful procedural results and a good recovery rate after the procedure. However, particularly for older adults, there are other factors that clinicians should consider during pre- and post-procedural status, such as patient’s goals, frailty, polypharmacy, dementia, or delirium. In this article, we reviewed current studies regarding TAVR for older adults with AS and CS, the reason for comprehensive geriatric assessment, and the introduction of appropriate geriatric assessment tools based on the Age-Friendly 4Ms framework that cardiologists can adopt in real-world practice.

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
Journal of Geriatric Cardiology
Pages 525-533

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
Kwak MJ, Irizarry-Caro JA, Martinez PR, et al. TAVR in older adults with cardiogenic shock: current practice and future direction. Journal of Geriatric Cardiology, 2025, 22(5): 525-533. https://doi.org/10.26599/1671-5411.2025.05.003

1751

Views

103

Downloads

0

Crossref

0

Web of Science

0

Scopus

0

CSCD

Published: 25 June 2025
© 2025 JGC All rights reserved

This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.