AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (2.2 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Research Article | Open Access

Predictive validation of existing bleeding and thromboembolic scores in elderly patients with comorbid atrial fibrillation and acute coronary syndrome

Hong-Hong ZHANG1,2Qi LIU3Hai-Jing ZHAO1,2Ya-Ni YU2Liu-Yang TIAN1,2Ying-Yue ZHANG1,2Zi-Hao FU1,2Li ZHENG1,2Yue ZHU1,2Yu-Han MA1,2Shuang LI4Yang-Yang MA4Yu-Qi LIU2,3 ( )
Medical School of Chinese PLA, Beijing, China
Department of Cardiology & National Clinical Research Center of Geriatrics Disease; Beijing Key Laboratory of Chronic Heart Failure Precision Medicine; National Key Laboratory of Kidney Diseases, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
Department of Cardiology, the Sixth Medical Center, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
Department of Information, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
Show Author Information

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The validation of various risk scores in elderly patients with comorbid atrial fibrillation (AF) and acute coronary syndrome (ACS) has not been reported. The present study compared the predictive performance of existing risk scores in these patients.

METHODS

A total of 1252 elderly patients with AF and ACS comorbidities (≥ 65 years old) were consecutively enrolled from January 2015 to December 2019. All patients were followed up for one year. The predictive performance of risk scores in predicting bleeding and thromboembolic events was calculated and compared.

RESULTS

During the 1-year follow-up, 183 (14.6%) patients had thromboembolic events, 198 (15.8%) patients had BARC class ≥ 2 bleeding events, and 61 (4.9%) patients had BARC class ≥ 3 bleeding events. For the BARC class ≥ 3 bleeding events, discrimination of the existing risk scores was low to moderate, PRECISE-DAPT (C-statistic: 0.638, 95% CI: 0.611-0.665), ATRIA (C-statistic: 0.615, 95% CI: 0.587-0.642), PARIS-MB (C-statistic: 0.612, 95% CI: 0.584-0.639), HAS-BLED (C-statistic: 0.597, 95% CI: 0.569-0.624) and CRUSADE (C-statistic: 0.595, 95% CI: 0.567-0.622). However, the calibration was good. PRECISE-DAPT showed a higher integrated discrimination improvement (IDI) than PARIS-MB, HAS-BLED, ATRIA, and CRUSADE (P < 0.05) and the best decision curve analysis (DCA). For thromboembolic events, the discrimination of GRACE (C-statistic: 0.636, 95% CI: 0.608-0.662) was higher than CHA2DS2-VASc (C-statistic: 0.612, 95% CI: 0.584-0.639), OPT-CAD (C-statistic: 0.602, 95% CI: 0.574-0.629) and PARIS-CTE (C-statistic: 0.595, 95% CI: 0.567-0.622). The calibration was good. Compared to OPT-CAD and PARIS-CTE, the IDI of the GRACE score slightly improved (P < 0.05). However, NRI analysis showed no significant difference. DCA showed that the clinical practicability of thromboembolic risk scores was similar.

CONCLUSIONS

The discrimination and calibration of existing risk scores in predicting 1-year thromboembolic and bleeding events were unsatisfactory in elderly patients with comorbid AF and ACS. PRECISE-DAPT showed higher IDI and DCA than other risk scores in predicting BARC class ≥ 3 bleeding events. The GRACE score showed a slight advantage in predicting thrombotic events.

Electronic Supplementary Material

Download File(s)
JGC-202212-028-R1supp.pdf (10.7 MB)

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
Journal of Geriatric Cardiology
Pages 330-340

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
ZHANG H-H, LIU Q, ZHAO H-J, et al. Predictive validation of existing bleeding and thromboembolic scores in elderly patients with comorbid atrial fibrillation and acute coronary syndrome. Journal of Geriatric Cardiology, 2023, 20(5): 330-340. https://doi.org/10.26599/1671-5411.2023.05.001

1484

Views

104

Downloads

2

Crossref

2

Web of Science

2

Scopus

0

CSCD

Published: 28 May 2023
© 2023 JGC All rights reserved