AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (1.3 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Open Access

Temporal upscaling of evapotranspiration for drip-irrigated grapevines in solar greenhouses: A comparative study in Northeast China’s cold region

School of Petrochemical Engineering, Liaoning Petrochemical University, Fushun 113001, Liaoning, China
College of Water Conservancy, Shenyang Agricultural University, Shenyang 110866, China
Show Author Information

Abstract

Temporal upscaling of evapotranspiration (ET) is crucial for improving water use efficiency and water-saving irrigation management in crop production, playing a vital role in guiding farmland irrigation. This study investigated the water consumption patterns and evaluated different temporal upscaling methods for ET in drip irrigated grapevines in Northeast China’s cold region. Based on a three-year experiment (2018, 2020, 2021), four upscaling methods were examined: the evaporation fraction method (EF method), the improved evaporation fraction method (EF′ method), the crop coefficient method (Kc method), and the direct canopy resistance method (rc method), applied to both instantaneous-to-daily and daily-to-whole-growth-period timescales. The results demonstrated that all key parameters, including evaporation fraction (EF), improved evaporation fraction (EF′), crop coefficient (Kc), and canopy resistance (rc), exhibited stable values from 8:00-16:00 when upscaling ET from instantaneous to daily scales. Their mean standard deviations (SD) ranged from 0.08-0.21, 0.08-0.19, 0.10-0.18, and 41.43-137.72 s/m, respectively. Regarding the simulation of instantaneous to daily upscaling, the methods ranked as EF method>EF′ method>Kc method>rc method. The EF method achieved optimal performance at specific times: 11:30 (shoot growth and the flowering period), 12:00 (fruit expansion), and 12:30 (maturity). For daily to whole growth period upscaling, all four methods performed best during the fruit expansion stage, maintaining the same performance ranking. The EF method consistently exhibited the smallest errors, with MAE values of 35.31 mm, 33.00 mm, and 42.97 mm, and RRMSE values of 12.21%, 11.40%, and 14.62% in 2018, 2020, and 2021, respectively. Therefore, the EF method is recommended for both upscaling ET from instantaneous to daily timescales and from daily to the entire growth period for drip-irrigated grapevines in Northeast China’s cold region. The findings not only enrich the analytical framework for agricultural hydrological processes, but also hold significant implications for implementing “hourly precision water management” in greenhouse grape cultivation and enhancing water use efficiency in greenhouse grape systems.

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
International Journal of Agricultural and Biological Engineering
Pages 294-306

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
Zhao J, Wei X, Jiang S. Temporal upscaling of evapotranspiration for drip-irrigated grapevines in solar greenhouses: A comparative study in Northeast China’s cold region. International Journal of Agricultural and Biological Engineering, 2026, 19(3): 294-306. https://doi.org/10.25165/j.ijabe.20261903.9948

15

Views

0

Downloads

0

Crossref

0

Web of Science

0

Scopus

Received: 03 June 2025
Accepted: 09 April 2026
Published: 30 June 2026
© The Author(s) 2026

We adopt the latest version of license CC BY 4.0, https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/