AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (1 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Open Access

Performance assessment of infiltration models for varying soil textural classes

School of Transportation Engineering, Yangzhou Polytechnic Institute, Yangzhou 225127, Jiangsu, China
Faculty of Agricultural Engineering and Technology, Sindh Agriculture University, Tandojam 70050, Pakistan
College of Optical, Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Zhejiang Agriculture and Forestry University, Hangzhou 311300, China
Yellow River Delta Intelligent Agricultural Machinery Equipment Industry Academy, Dongying 257300, Shandong, China
Show Author Information

Abstract

Field experiments were carried out to investigate the soil infiltration rates in different soil textures (clay loam, clay, and silty clay loam) with five infiltration models (Kostiakov, Modified Kostiakov, Philip, Horton, and Green-Ampt). Field experiments were conducted at the experimental stations of Sindh Agriculture University, Tandojam (Station No. 1, Faculty of Agricultural Engineering; 25°25′28′′N, 68°32′24′′E), (Station No. 2, Latif Experimental Farm; 25°26′14′′N, 68°32′30′′E) and Agriculture Research, Tandojam, (Station No. 3, Barley and Wheat Research Institute, 25° 24′ 59′′ N 68° 32′ 40′′ E), Sindh, Pakistan. These stations were selected to meet the needs of three different soil textures. The composted soil samples were collected at a depth of 0-30 cm, and their textural classes were determined with the Bouyoucos hydrometer method. Field infiltration rates were measured using a double ring infiltrometer method. The results showed that the initial infiltration rates were high and gradually decreased until they reached a steady state. Using statistical parameters (NSE, RMSE, CC, and R2), the measured infiltration rates were compared with the predicted infiltration rates of the selected infiltration models. For clay loam soil, Philip’s model had the lowest RMSE and highest NSE, CC, and R2 values, followed by Horton’s model. For both clay and silty clay loam soils, Horton’s model was the most accurate in predicting the infiltration rate with the lowest RMSE and highest NSE, CC, and R2 values, followed by Philip’s model. The other three models (Kostiakov’s, Modified Kostiakov’s, and Green-Ampt’s) performed poorly with higher errors and lower agreements compared to Horton’s and Philip’s models. In conclusion, Horton’s model demonstrated the highest accuracy and agreement for clay and silty clay loam soils, while Philip’s model showed the best performance for clay loam soil. These findings contribute to understanding the behavior of soil infiltration rate and provide valuable insights for land and water management practices in the studied area.

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
International Journal of Agricultural and Biological Engineering
Pages 175-181

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
Yang X, Soomro SA, Rajani VK, et al. Performance assessment of infiltration models for varying soil textural classes. International Journal of Agricultural and Biological Engineering, 2025, 18(6): 175-181. https://doi.org/10.25165/j.ijabe.20251806.9603

2

Views

0

Downloads

0

Crossref

0

Web of Science

0

Scopus

Received: 15 December 2024
Accepted: 23 September 2025
Published: 31 December 2025
© The Author(s) 2025

We adopt the latest version of license CC BY 4.0, https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/