AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (995.2 KB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Open Access

Recalibration of four empirical reference crop evapotranspiration models using a hybrid Differential Evolution-Grey Wolf Optimizer algorithm

College of Horticulture and Plant Protection, Henan University of Science and Technology, Luoyang 471000, China
College of Mechanical and Electronic Engineering, Northwest A & F University, Yangling 712100, Shaanxi, China
College of Agricultural Equipment Engineering, Henan University of Science and Technology, Luoyang 471000, Henan, China
Key Laboratory for Agricultural Soil and Water Engineering in Arid Area of Ministry of Education, Northwest A & F University, Yangling 712100, Shaanxi, China
Show Author Information

Abstract

Accurate estimation of reference crop evapotranspiration (ET0) is essential for water resource management and irrigation scheduling. A multitude of empirical models have been employed to estimate ET0, yielding satisfactory outcomes. However, the performance of each model is contingent upon the empirical parameters utilized. This study examines the applicability of four empirical ET0 models, namely the Makkink (Mak), Irmark-Allen (IA), improved Baier-Robertson (MBR), and Brutsaert-Stricker (BS) models. Meteorological data from 24 weather stations across various regions in China were procured and employed to assess the ET0 simulation results. The study employed the Differential Evolution (DE) optimization algorithm, Grey Wolf Optimizer (GWO) algorithm, and a hybrid algorithm that combines DE and GWO algorithms (DE-GWO algorithm) to optimize the parameters of the four empirical models. The findings revealed that the optimization algorithms significantly enhanced the regional adaptability of the four models, particularly the BS model. The DE-GWO algorithm demonstrated superior optimization performance (RMSE=0.055-0.372, R²=0.912-0.998, MAE=0.037-0.311, and FS=0.864-0.982) compared to the DE (RMSE=0.101-2.015, R²=0.529-0.997, MAE=0.075-1.695, and FS=0.383-0.967) and GWO (RMSE=0.158-0.915, R²=0.694-0.987, MAE=0.111-0.701, and FS=0.688-0.947) algorithms. The DE-GWO-optimized BS model was the most accurate and improved, followed by the MBR model. The IA and Mak models also showed slightly better performance after optimization with the DE-GWO algorithm. The DE-GWO-optimized BS model performed better in the southern agricultural region than in other regions. It is recommended to utilize the DE-GWO to enhance the accurate prediction of empirical ET0 models across the nine agricultural regions of China.

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
International Journal of Agricultural and Biological Engineering
Pages 173-180

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
Zhao L, Yang S, Zhao X, et al. Recalibration of four empirical reference crop evapotranspiration models using a hybrid Differential Evolution-Grey Wolf Optimizer algorithm. International Journal of Agricultural and Biological Engineering, 2025, 18(1): 173-180. https://doi.org/10.25165/j.ijabe.20251801.9380

793

Views

67

Downloads

3

Crossref

3

Web of Science

4

Scopus

Received: 20 September 2024
Accepted: 23 December 2024
Published: 28 February 2025
© The Author(s) 2025

We adopt the latest version of license CC BY 4.0, https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/