AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (852.5 KB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Open Access

Sustainability analysis of various air-assisted orchard sprayer fan designs: Performance, energy and carbon footprint

Department of Agricultural Machinery and Technologies Engineering, Faculty of Agriculture, Çukurova University, Adana 01330, Türkiye
Vocational School of Ceyhan, Department of Agricultural Machinery, Çukurova University, Adana 01950, Türkiye
Show Author Information

Abstract

The fan unit design of air-assisted orchard sprayers directly affects the amount of deposits on leaf surfaces, the amount of airborne drift and endodrift, as well as the fuel consumption during the operation. Therefore, in addition to reducing fuel consumption by modifying the fan inlet side, re-designing fan blade type, deflector type, and discharge side design of the turbofan unit has been a recent increasing trend in R&D studies to achieve higher airflow and better air-jet uniformity. In this study, to achieve better air penetration into the tree canopy, design and performance comparisons were made of three different turbofan designs, one of which is currently available on the market and popular in sprayers, while the other two are new designs. In accordance with EN ISO 9898, wind tunnel tests were carried out at a PTO rotation speed of 540 r/min with fan blade angles of 15º, 30º, and 45º and fan ratios of 1:3.5 (1890 r/min) and 1:4.5 (2430 r/min) for each turbofan. Simultaneously, air velocity measurements were made from the fan inlet side of the wind tunnel and from the discharge side of the fan. Furthermore, torque (N·m), speed measurement (r/min), and instantaneous fuel consumption (L/h) depending on the operation were also measured. The success of the fan blade type was determined by fan efficiency, and specific fuel consumption was an additional indicator of operating conditions. In experiments, 77.5% fan efficiency and specific fuel consumption 0.44 kg/kW·h was achieved with NVS fan. Regardless of fan type, several operational conditions available to users in fan design were statistically proven to be ineffective in terms of airflow.

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
International Journal of Agricultural and Biological Engineering
Pages 32-37

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
İtmeç M, Bayat A, Özlüoymak ÖB, et al. Sustainability analysis of various air-assisted orchard sprayer fan designs: Performance, energy and carbon footprint. International Journal of Agricultural and Biological Engineering, 2024, 17(6): 32-37. https://doi.org/10.25165/j.ijabe.20241706.9244

873

Views

61

Downloads

0

Crossref

5

Web of Science

5

Scopus

Received: 23 July 2024
Accepted: 05 November 2024
Published: 31 December 2024
© The Author(s) 2024

We adopt the latest version of license CC BY 4.0, https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/