AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (616.1 KB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Open Access

Influences of mechanized tillage and sowing modes on soil physical properties, soybean yield and economic benefits in mollisols region of Northeast China

College of Engineering, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin 150030, China
Heilongjiang Province Technology Innovation Center of Mechanization and Materialization of Major Crops Production, Harbin 150030, China
College of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, East University of Heilongjiang, Harbin 150066, China
Show Author Information

Abstract

Appropriate mechanized straw returning and tillage sowing techniques were effective means to optimize soil physical properties and enhance agricultural productivity, as well as important measures for the conservation and restoration of mollisols region in Northeast China. Under the condition of full-scale maize straw returning, four mechanized tillage and sowing modes were set, including plough tillage and sowing (PTS), combined tillage and sowing (CTS), no-tillage and sowing (NTS), and no-tillage and sowing with straw mulching (NTSM). In 2020 and 2021, the study investigated the effects of different mechanized tillage and sowing modes on soil physical properties, soybean yield and economic benefits. The results showed that during the pod-setting and pod-filling period of soybean, the NTS and NTSM treatments exhibited better effects on deep soil insulation and shallow soil moisture retention, the soil physical structure of PTS and CTS treatments were relatively ideal. Compared with PTS and CTS treatments, NTS and NTSM treatments significantly increased soil gravimetric water content (SWC) by 2.35% to 7.98% in the 5-15 cm soil layer and increased soil temperature (ST) by 3.94% to 10.42% in the 25-35 cm soil layer (p<0.05), significantly increased soil bulk density (SBD) by 2.98% to 6.72% and significantly reduced soil total porosity (STP) by 3.88% to 6.53% in the 5-25 cm soil layer, and significantly reduced soil gas phase ratio by 8.26% to 6.27% at the 15-25 cm soil layers, which caused soil three-phase ratio (STPR) of PTS and CTS treatment in 15-25 cm soil layer were relatively ideal. The soybean yield of NTSM treatment in 2020 was not significantly different from PTS and CTS treatment (p>0.05), the soybean yield of NTSM treatment in 2021 significantly increased by 7.30% and 5.84% over PTS and CTS treatments, respectively. And the average annual profit per unit area of NTSM treatment increased by 12.84%, 12.41% and 8.57% compared with PTS, CTS and NTS treatments, respectively. Therefore, it was recommended to combine NTSM technique with PTS or CTS technique in a maize-soybean rotation system in mollisols region. The research results provided reference for the selection of appropriate mechanized tillage and sowing techniques in Northeast China’s mollisols region and had important guiding significance and practical value for the construction of rational plow layers and the implementation of conservation tillage.

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
International Journal of Agricultural and Biological Engineering
Pages 130-139

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
Chen H, Sun J, Zhang Y, et al. Influences of mechanized tillage and sowing modes on soil physical properties, soybean yield and economic benefits in mollisols region of Northeast China. International Journal of Agricultural and Biological Engineering, 2024, 17(3): 130-139. https://doi.org/10.25165/j.ijabe.20241703.8724

519

Views

44

Downloads

1

Crossref

2

Web of Science

2

Scopus

Received: 11 December 2023
Accepted: 08 May 2024
Published: 30 June 2024
© The Author(s) 2024

We adopt the latest version of license CC BY 4.0, https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/