AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (1.4 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Open Access

Comparison of life cycle assessment of large-scale biogas projects with different raw materials in China

School of Energy and Environment, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong 999077, China
College of Engineering, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin 150030, China
Key Laboratory of Agricultural Renewable Resources Utilization Technology and Equipment in Cold Areas of Heilongjiang Province, Harbin 150030, China
College of Natural Resources and Environment, Northwest A & F University, Yangling 712100, Shaanxi China

†These authors contributed equally to this work.

Show Author Information

Abstract

The anaerobic digestion (AD) disposal of stover and cattle manure is of great significance to the development of low-carbon economy and green energy in China, but it will also have an impact on the environment, and the degree of influence is different for various raw materials. In this study, life cycle assessment (LCA) methods were applied to analyze and compare the impact of corn stovers biogas projects (CSBP) and dairy manure biogas projects (DMBP) on the environment during the whole operation stage. The results of inventory analysis were evaluated by ReCiPe2016 Hierarchy(H) mid-point (problem-oriented) and end-point (destruction-oriented) method, respectively. The results showed that the net energy efficiency of CSBP was higher (763.903 kW·h/FU) and the greenhouse gas (GHG) emission reduction of DMBP was more (5541.418 kg CO2-eq/FU). The anaerobic digestion (AD) units have the greatest environmental impacts, and human carcinogenic toxicity is the largest environmental impact category (1.16-1.43 PE). The key to reducing environmental impact is reducing the input of chemical substances and the waste of electric energy. Both CSBP and DMBP have a favorable impact on ecosystem quality and resources, and CSBP is more beneficial to the environment (–10.297 Pt). Co-digestion is an important measure to reduce the environmental damage from biogas projects. These research results provide theoretical support for the selection of raw materials for large-scale biogas projects in China, provide technical basis for reducing the impact of actual operation on the environment, and promote the resource utilization of agricultural waste and carbon dioxide emission reduction and sequestration.

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
International Journal of Agricultural and Biological Engineering
Pages 268-279

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
Sun J, Qu Y, Lyu X, et al. Comparison of life cycle assessment of large-scale biogas projects with different raw materials in China. International Journal of Agricultural and Biological Engineering, 2024, 17(2): 268-279. https://doi.org/10.25165/j.ijabe.20241702.8898

1334

Views

112

Downloads

2

Crossref

5

Web of Science

5

Scopus

Received: 04 March 2024
Accepted: 17 April 2024
Published: 30 April 2024
© The Author(s) 2024

We adopt the latest version of license CC BY 4.0, https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/