Journal Home > Volume 2 , Issue 1
iEnergy 2023, 2(1): 43-62 https://doi.org/10.23919/IEN.2023.0010
Review | Open Access | Issue | Published: 01 March 2023

Revisit power system dispatch: Concepts, models, and solutions

Show Author's Information Zhifang Yang1,  Pei Yong2,  Mingxu Xiang1( )
State Key Laboratory of Power Transmission Equipment & System Security and New Technology, College of Electrical Engineering, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400044, China
State Key Laboratory of Power Systems, Department of Electrical Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
Keywords:
energy storage, optimal power flow, Power system dispatch, unit commitment
Cite this article:
Yang Z, Yong P, Xiang M. Revisit power system dispatch: Concepts, models, and solutions. iEnergy, 2023, 2(1): 43-62. https://doi.org/10.23919/IEN.2023.0010
Download citation
EndNote(RIS)
BibTeX

605

Views

88

Downloads

Citations

5

Crossref

N/A

WoS

0

Scopus

N/A

CSCD

Abstract Full text About this article

Power system dispatch is a general concept with a wide range of applications. It is a special category of optimization problems that determine the operation pattern of the power system, resulting in a huge influence on the power system security, efficiency, and economics. In this paper, the power system dispatch problem is revisited from the basis. This paper provides a categorization of the dispatch problem, especially with an emphasis on industrial applications. Then, this paper presents a detailed review of the dispatch models. The common formulations of the dispatch problem are provided. Finally, this paper discusses the solutions of the dispatch problem and lists the major challenges.


menu
Abstract
Full text
Outline
About this article

Revisit power system dispatch: Concepts, models, and solutions

Show Author's information Zhifang Yang1, Pei Yong2, Mingxu Xiang1( )
State Key Laboratory of Power Transmission Equipment & System Security and New Technology, College of Electrical Engineering, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400044, China
State Key Laboratory of Power Systems, Department of Electrical Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China

Abstract

Power system dispatch is a general concept with a wide range of applications. It is a special category of optimization problems that determine the operation pattern of the power system, resulting in a huge influence on the power system security, efficiency, and economics. In this paper, the power system dispatch problem is revisited from the basis. This paper provides a categorization of the dispatch problem, especially with an emphasis on industrial applications. Then, this paper presents a detailed review of the dispatch models. The common formulations of the dispatch problem are provided. Finally, this paper discusses the solutions of the dispatch problem and lists the major challenges.

Keywords: energy storage, optimal power flow, Power system dispatch, unit commitment

References(213)

[1]
Philipsen, R., Morales-España, G., de Weerdt, M., de Vries, L. (2019). Trading power instead of energy in day-ahead electricity markets. Applied Energy, 233–234: 802–815.
DOI
[2]

Von Krannichfeldt, L., Wang, Y., Hug, G. (2021). Online ensemble learning for load forecasting. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 36: 545–548.
DOI Google Scholar
[3]

Ji, Z., Kang, C., Chen, Q., Xia, Q., Jiang, C., Chen, Z., Xin, J. (2013). Low-carbon power system dispatch incorporating carbon capture power plants. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 28: 4615–4623.
DOI Google Scholar
[4]

Shao, Z., Zhai, Q., Wu, J., Guan, X. (2021). Data based linear power flow model: Investigation of a least-squares based approximation. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 36: 4246–4258.
DOI Google Scholar
[5]

Bakirtzis, E. A., Biskas, P. N. (2016). Multiple time resolution stochastic scheduling for systems with high renewable penetration. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 32: 1030–1040.
DOI Google Scholar
[6]

Huang, C., Yue, D., Xie, J., Li, Y., Wang, K. (2016). Economic dispatch of power systems with virtual power plant based interval optimization method. CSEE Journal of Power and Energy Systems, 2: 74–80.
DOI Google Scholar
[7]
Dommel, H. W., Tinney, W. F. (1968). Optimal power flow solutions. IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems, 1968, PAS-87: 1866–1876.
DOI
[8]

Ibrahim, T., De Rubira, T. T., Del Rosso, A., Patel, M., Guggilam, S., Mohamed, A. A. (2022). Alternating optimization approach for voltage-secure multi-period optimal reactive power dispatch. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 37: 3805–3816.
DOI Google Scholar
[9]

Rajan, A., Malakar, T. (2015). Optimal reactive power dispatch using hybrid Nelder–Mead simplex based firefly algorithm. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, 66: 9–24.
DOI Google Scholar
[10]

Arroyo, J. (2022). Ensuring physically realizable storage operation in the unit commitment problem. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 37: 4966–4969.
DOI Google Scholar
[11]

Li, J., Liu, F., Li, Z., Mei, S., He, G. (2018). Impacts and benefits of UPFC to wind power integration in unit commitment. Renewable Energy, 116: 570–583.
DOI Google Scholar
[12]

Garcia, M., Baldick, R. (2020). Approximating economic dispatch by linearizing transmission losses. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 35: 1009–1022.
DOI Google Scholar
[13]

Ding, T., Zhang, X., Lu, R., Qu, M., Shahidehpour, M., He, Y., Chen, T. (2022). Multi-stage distributionally robust stochastic dual dynamic programming to multi-period economic dispatch with virtual energy storage. IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy, 13: 146–158.
DOI Google Scholar
[14]

Chen, S., Zhang, L., Yan, Z., Shen, Z. (2021). A distributed and robust security-constrained economic dispatch algorithm based on blockchain. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 37: 691–700.
DOI Google Scholar
[15]

Lei, Y., Hui, M., Kumar, S. T., Gang, L. (2022). Security-constrained economic dispatch exploiting the operational flexibility of transmission networks. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, 138: 107914.
DOI Google Scholar
[16]

Amjady, N., Aghaei, J., Ali Shayanfar, H. (2009). Stochastic multiobjective market clearing of joint energy and reserves auctions ensuring power system security. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 24: 1841–1854.
DOI Google Scholar
[17]

Li, Y., Huang, J., Liu, Y., Zhao, T., Zhou, Y., Zhao, Y., Yuen, C. (2022). Day-ahead risk averse market clearing considering demand response with data-driven load uncertainty representation: A Singapore electricity market study. Energy, 254: 123923.
DOI Google Scholar
[18]

Kazemi, M., Zareipour, H., Amjady, N., Rosehart, W. D., Ehsan, M. (2017). Operation scheduling of battery storage systems in joint energy and ancillary services markets. IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy, 8: 1726–1735.
DOI Google Scholar
[19]

Ahmad, F., Alam, M. S., Shariff, S. M. (2019). A cost-efficient energy management system for battery swapping station. IEEE Systems Journal, 13: 4355–4364.
DOI Google Scholar
[20]

Fang, X., Mathias, H. B., Du, E., Kang, C., Li, F. (2019). Introducing uncertainty components in locational marginal prices for pricing wind power and load uncertainties. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 34: 2013–2024.
DOI Google Scholar
[21]

Huang, H., Zhou, M., Li, G. (2019). An endogenous approach to quantifying the wind power reserve. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 35: 2431–2442.
DOI Google Scholar
[22]

Sadegh, M. M., Le, X., Claudio, C. M., Simone, G., Algo, C., Thatte Anupam, A., Kumar, P. R. (2019). Scenario-based economic dispatch with tunable risk levels in high-renewable power systems. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 34: 5103–5114.
DOI Google Scholar
[23]
Cplex. (2023). User's manual for CPLEX. Available at: https://www.ibm.com/docs/zh/icos/12.10.0?topic=cplex-users-manual.
[24]
Gurobi. (2023). Gurobi optimizer reference manual. Available at: https://www.gurobi.com/documentation/current/refman/index.html.
[25]
Cain, M. B., O'Neill, R., Castillo, A. (2012). History of optimal power flow and formulations optimal power flow paper 1. Available at: https://www.ferc.gov/sites/default/files/2020-04/acopf-1-history-formulation-testing.pdf.
[26]

Chen, Y., Wang, F., Ma, Y., Yao, Y. (2020). A distributed framework for solving and benchmarking security constrained unit commitment with warm start. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 35: 711–720.
DOI Google Scholar
[27]
Chen, Y., Pan, F., Qiu, F., Xavier, A. S., Zheng, T., Marwali, M., Knueven, B., Guan, Y., Luh, P. B., Wu, L., et al. (2022). Security-constrained unit commitment for electricity market: Modeling, solution methods, and future challenges. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, https://doi.org/10.1109/TPWRS.2022.3213001.
DOI
[28]

Viafora, N., Morozovska, K., Kazmi, S. H. H., Laneryd, T., Hilber, P., Holbøll, J. (2019). Day-ahead dispatch optimization with dynamic thermal rating of transformers and overhead lines. Electric Power Systems Research, 171: 194–208.
DOI Google Scholar
[29]

Xu, J., Wang, B., Sun, Y., Xu, Q., Liu, J., Cao, H., Jiang, H., Lei, R., Shen, M. (2019). A day-ahead economic dispatch method considering extreme scenarios based on wind power uncertainty. CSEE Journal of Power and Energy Systems, 5: 224–233.
DOI Google Scholar
[30]

Xiang, M., Yang, Z., Yu, J., Du, E., Fang, X. (2022). Real-time dispatch with secondary frequency regulation: A pathway to consider intra-interval fluctuations. IEEE Systems Journal, 16: 5556–5567.
DOI Google Scholar
[31]

Li, Z., Wu, W., Zhang, B., Wang, B. (2015). Adjustable robust real-time power dispatch with large-scale wind power integration. IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy, 6: 357–368.
DOI Google Scholar
[32]

Carpentier, J. (1962). Contribution á l’étude du dispatching économique. (in French). Bulletin de la Société Française des Électriciens, 8: 431–447.
Google Scholar
[33]

Yang, Z., Zhong, H., Bose, A., Zheng, T., Xia, Q., Kang, C. (2018). A linearized OPF model with reactive power and voltage magnitude: A pathway to improve the MW-only DC OPF. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 33: 1734–1745.
DOI Google Scholar
[34]

Yang, Z., Xie, K., Yu, J., Zhong, H., Zhang, N., Xia, Q. (2019). A general formulation of linear power flow models: Basic theory and error analysis. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 34: 1315–1324.
DOI Google Scholar
[35]

Stott, B., Jardim, J., Alsac, O. (2009). DC power flow revisited. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 24: 1290–1300.
DOI Google Scholar
[36]

Yang, L., Zhou, N., Zhou, G., Chi, Y., Chen, N., Wang, L., Wang, Q., Chang, D. (2022). Day-ahead optimal dispatch model for coupled system considering ladder-type ramping rate and flexible spinning reserve of thermal power units. Journal of Modern Power Systems and Clean Energy, 10: 1482–1493.
DOI Google Scholar
[37]

Du, Y., Li, F., Li, J., Zheng, T. (2019). Achieving 100x acceleration for N-1 contingency screening with uncertain scenarios using deep convolutional neural network. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 34: 3303–3305.
DOI Google Scholar
[38]

Capitanescu, F. (2016). Critical review of recent advances and further developments needed in AC optimal power flow. Electric Power Systems Research, 136: 57–68.
DOI Google Scholar
[39]

Morales-España, G., Latorre, J. M., Ramos, A. (2013). Tight and compact MILP formulation of start-up and shut-down ramping in unit commitment. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 28: 1288–1296.
DOI Google Scholar
[40]

Wu, J., Luh, P. B., Chen, Y., Bragin, M. A., Yan, B. (2022). A novel optimization approach for sub-hourly unit commitment with large numbers of units and virtual transactions. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 37: 3716–3725.
DOI Google Scholar
[41]

Erdiwansyah, Mahidin, Husin, H., Nasaruddin, Zaki, M., Muhibbuddin. (2021). A critical review of the integration of renewable energy sources with various technologies. Protection and Control of Modern Power Systems, 6: 1–18.
DOI Google Scholar
[42]

An, Y., Zeng, B. (2015). Exploring the modeling capacity of two-stage robust optimization: Variants of robust unit commitment model. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 30: 109–122.
DOI Google Scholar
[43]

Xu, S., Wu, W. (2022). Tractable reformulation of two-side chance-constrained economic dispatch. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 37: 796–799.
DOI Google Scholar
[44]

Ming, H., Xie, L., Campi, M. C., Garatti, S., Kumar, P. R. (2019). Scenario-based economic dispatch with uncertain demand response. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 10: 1858–1868.
DOI Google Scholar
[45]

Yan, N., Xing, Z. X., Li, W., Zhang, B. (2016). Economic dispatch application of power system with energy storage systems. IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity, 26: 1–5.
DOI Google Scholar
[46]

Zhang, G., Ela, E., Wang, Q. (2019). Market scheduling and pricing for primary and secondary frequency reserve. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 34: 2914–2924.
DOI Google Scholar
[47]

Lin, C. E., Huang, C. J., Huang, C. L., Liang, C. C., Lee, S. Y. (1992). An expert system for generator maintenance scheduling using operation index. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 7: 1141–1148.
DOI Google Scholar
[48]

Al-Abdullah, Y. M., Salloum, A., Hedman, K. W., Vittal, V. (2016). Analyzing the impacts of constraint relaxation practices in electric energy markets. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 31: 2566–2577.
DOI Google Scholar
[49]

Salloum, A., Al-Abdullah, Y. M., Vittal, V., Hedman, K. (2016). Impacts of constraint relaxations on power system operational security. IEEE Power and Energy Technology Systems Journal, 3: 99–108.
DOI Google Scholar
[50]

Fang, X., Yang, Z., Yu, J., Lai, X., Xia, Q. (2020). Electricity pricing under constraint violations. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 35: 2794–2803.
DOI Google Scholar
[51]

Tejada Arango Diego, A., Pedro, S. M., Andres, R. (2018). Security constrained unit commitment using line outage distribution factors. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 33: 329–337.
DOI Google Scholar
[52]

Zhang, C., Liu, Q., Zhou, B., Chung, C. Y., Li, J., Zhu, L., Shuai, Z. (2023). A central limit theorem-based method for DC and AC power flow analysis under interval uncertainty of renewable power generation. IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy, 14: 563–575.
DOI Google Scholar
[53]

Zhang, S., Zhang, D., Qiao, J., Wang, X., Zhang, Z. (2021). Preventive control for power system transient security based on XGBoost and DCOPF with consideration of model interpretability. CSEE Journal of Power and Energy Systems, 7: 279–294.
Google Scholar
[54]

Chen, Y., Pan, F., Holzer, J., Rothberg, E., Ma, Y., Veeramany, A. (2021). A high performance computing based market economics driven neighborhood search and polishing algorithm for security constrained unit commitment. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 36: 292–302.
DOI Google Scholar
[55]

O'Neill, R. P., Castillo, A., Eldridge, B., Hytowitz, R. B. (2017). Dual pricing algorithm in ISO markets. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 32: 3308–3310.
DOI Google Scholar
[56]

Guo, Y., Chen, C., Tong, L. (2021). Pricing multi-interval dispatch under uncertainty part I: Dispatch-following incentives. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 36: 3865–3877.
DOI Google Scholar
[57]

Yan, B., Luh, P. B., Zheng, T., Schiro, D. A., Bragin, M. A., Zhao, F., Zhao, J., Lelic, I. (2020). A systematic formulation tightening approach for unit commitment problems. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 35: 782–794.
DOI Google Scholar
[58]

Al-Abdullah, Y. M., Abdi-Khorsand, M., Hedman, K. W. (2015). The role of out-of-market corrections in day-ahead scheduling. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 30: 1937–1946.
DOI Google Scholar
[59]

Xia, X., Elaiw, A. M. (2010). Optimal dynamic economic dispatch of generation: A review. Electric Power Systems Research, 80: 975–986.
DOI Google Scholar
[60]

Lin, W. M., Chen, S. J. (2002). Bid-based dynamic economic dispatch with an efficient interior point algorithm. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, 24: 51–57.
DOI Google Scholar
[61]

Attaviriyanupap, P., Kita, H., Tanaka, E., Hasegawa, J. (2004). A fuzzy-optimization approach to dynamic economic dispatch considering uncertainties. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 19: 1299–1307.
DOI Google Scholar
[62]

Venkatesh, B., Sadasivam, G., Khan, M. A. (2000). A new optimal reactive power scheduling method for loss minimization and voltage stability margin maximization using successive multi-objective fuzzy LP technique. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 15: 844–851.
DOI Google Scholar
[63]

Lamadrid, A. J., Shawhan, D. L., Murillo-S á nchez, C. E., Zimmerman, R. D., Zhu, Y., Tylavsky, D. J., Kindle, A. G., Dar, Z. (2015). Stochastically optimized, carbon-reducing dispatch of storage, generation, and loads. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 30: 1064–1075.
DOI Google Scholar
[64]

Li, Y.F., Pedroni, N., Zio, E. (2013). A memetic evolutionary multi-objective optimization method for environmental power unit commitment. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 28: 2660–2669.
DOI Google Scholar
[65]

Somuah, C. B., Khunaizi, N. (1990). Application of linear programming redispatch technique to dynamic generation allocation. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 5: 20–26.
DOI Google Scholar
[66]
Wood, A. J., Wollenberg, B. F., Sheblé, G. B. (2014). Power Generation, Operation, and Control Third Edition, Hoboken, NJ, USA: Wiley-Interscience.
[67]

Carrión, M., Arroyo, J. (2006). A computationally efficient mixed-integer linear formulation for the thermal unit commitment problem. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 21: 1371–1378.
DOI Google Scholar
[68]

Attaviriyanupap, P., Kita, H., Tanaka, E., Hasegawa, J. (2002). A hybrid EP and SQP for dynamic economic dispatch with nonsmooth fuel cost function. IEEE Power Engineering Review, 22: 77.
DOI Google Scholar
[69]

Yang, H. T., Yang, P.C., Huang, C. L. (1996). Evolutionary programming based economic dispatch for units with non-smooth fuel cost functions. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 11: 112–118.
DOI Google Scholar
[70]

Walters, D. C., Sheble, G. B. (1993). Genetic algorithm solution of economic dispatch with valve point loading. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 8: 1325–1332.
DOI Google Scholar
[71]

Han, X. S., Gooi, H. B. (2007). Effective economic dispatch model and algorithm. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, 29: 113–120.
DOI Google Scholar
[72]
Shahidehpour, M., Yamin, H., Li, Z. (2002). Market Operations in Electric Power Systems: Forecasting, Scheduling, and Risk Management. Piscataway, NJ, USA: Wiley-IEEE Press.
DOI
[73]

Du, E., Zhang, N., Kang, C., Xia, Q. (2019). A high-efficiency network-constrained clustered unit commitment model for power system planning studies. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 34: 2498–2508.
DOI Google Scholar
[74]

Zhang, N., Kang, C., Xia, Q., Ding, Y., Huang, Y., Sun, R., Huang, J., Bai, J. (2015). A convex model of risk-based unit commitment for day-ahead market clearing considering wind power uncertainty. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 30: 1582–1592.
DOI Google Scholar
[75]

Yang, Z., Zhong, H., Bose, A., Xia, Q., Kang, C. (2018). Optimal power flow in AC–DC grids with discrete control devices. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 33: 1461–1472.
DOI Google Scholar
[76]

Moya, O. E. (2005). A spinning reserve, load shedding, and economic dispatch solution by bender’s decomposition. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 20: 384–388.
DOI Google Scholar
[77]

Yong, P., Zhang, N., Kang, C., Xia, Q., Lu, D. (2019). MPLP-based fast power system reliability evaluation using transmission line status dictionary. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 34: 1630–1640.
DOI Google Scholar
[78]

Lavaei, J., Low, S. H. (2012). Zero duality gap in optimal power flow problem. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 27: 92–107.
DOI Google Scholar
[79]

Bai, X., Wei, H., Fujisawa, K., Wang, Y. (2008). Semidefinite programming for optimal power flow problems. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, 30: 383–392.
DOI Google Scholar
[80]

Coffrin, C., Hijazi, H. L., Van Hentenryck, P. (2016). The QC relaxation: A theoretical and computational study on optimal power flow. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 31: 3008–3018.
DOI Google Scholar
[81]

Farivar, M., Low, S. H. (2013). Branch flow model: Relaxations and convexification—Part I. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 28: 2554–2564.
DOI Google Scholar
[82]

Kocuk, B., Dey, S. S., Sun, X. A. (2016). Strong SOCP relaxations for the optimal power flow problem. Operations Research, 64: 1177–1196.
DOI Google Scholar
[83]

Gan, L., Li, N., Topcu, U., Low, S. (2013). Exact convex relaxation of optimal power flow in radial networks. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 60: 72–87.
DOI Google Scholar
[84]

dos Santos, T. N., Diniz, A. (2011). A dynamic piecewise linear model for DC transmission losses in optimal scheduling problems. IEEE Transactions on Power systems, 26: 508–519.
DOI Google Scholar
[85]

Yang, J., Zhang, N., Kang, C., Xia, Q. (2017). A state-independent linear power flow model with accurate estimation of voltage magnitude. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 32: 3607–3617.
DOI Google Scholar
[86]

Liu, Y., Zhang, N., Wang, Y., Yang, J., Kang, C. (2019). Data-driven power flow linearization: A regression approach. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 10: 2569–2580.
DOI Google Scholar
[87]

Liu, Y., Wang, Y., Zhang, N., Lu, D., Kang, C. (2020). A data-driven approach to linearize power flow equations considering measurement noise. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 11: 2576–2587.
DOI Google Scholar
[88]

Tan, Y., Chen, Y., Li, Y., Cao, Y. (2020). Linearizing power flow model: A hybrid physical model-driven and data-driven approach. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 35: 2475–2478.
DOI Google Scholar
[89]

Ng, W. Y. (1981). Generalized generation distribution factors for power system security evaluations. IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems, PAS-100: 1001–1005.
DOI Google Scholar
[90]

Sinha, N., Chakrabarti, R., Chattopadhyay, P. K. (2003). Evolutionary programming techniques for economic load dispatch. IEEE Trans Evolutionary Computation, 7: 83–94.
DOI Google Scholar
[91]

Park, J. B., Lee, K. S., Shin, J. R., Lee, K. Y. (2005). A particle swarm optimization for economic dispatch with nonsmooth cost functions. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 20: 34–42.
DOI Google Scholar
[92]

Meysam, J. N., Hasan, M. (2011). Discussion of “Scheduling of spinning reserve considering customer choice on reliability”. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 26: 967.
DOI Google Scholar
[93]

Wang, J., Wang, X., Wu, Y. (2005). Operating reserve model in the power market. IEEE Transactions on Power systems, 20: 223–229.
DOI Google Scholar
[94]

Li, N., Hedman, K. (2015). Economic assessment of energy storage in systems with high levels of renewable resources. IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy, 6: 1103–1111.
DOI Google Scholar
[95]
Ackermann, T. (2005). Wind Power in Power Systems. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
DOI
[96]

Hetzer, J., Yu, D. C., Bhattarai, K. (2008). An economic dispatch model incorporating wind power. IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion, 23: 603–611.
DOI Google Scholar
[97]

Liang, R., Liao, J. (2007). A fuzzy-optimization approach for generation scheduling with wind and solar energy systems. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 22: 1665–1674.
DOI Google Scholar
[98]

Peng, C., Xie, P., Pan, L., Yu, R. (2016). Flexible robust optimization dispatch for hybrid wind/photovoltaic/hydro/thermal power system. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 7: 751–762.
DOI Google Scholar
[99]

Wang, W., Li, C., Liao, X., Qin, H. (2017). Study on unit commitment problem considering pumped storage and renewable energy via a novel binary artificial sheep algorithm. Applied Energy, 187: 612–626.
DOI Google Scholar
[100]

Bruninx, K., Dvorkin, Y., Delarue, E., Pandzic, H., D'Haeseleer, W., Kirschen, D. (2016). Coupling pumped hydro energy storage with unit commitment. IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy, 7: 786–796.
DOI Google Scholar
[101]

Divya, K. C., Østergaard, J. (2009). Battery energy storage technology for power systems—An overview. Electric Power Systems Research, 79: 511–520.
DOI Google Scholar
[102]

He, G., Chen, Q., Kang, C., Pinson, P., Xia, Q. (2016). Optimal bidding strategy of battery storage in power markets considering performance-based regulation and battery cycle life. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 7: 2359–2367.
DOI Google Scholar
[103]

Flourentzou, N., Agelidis, V. G., Demetriades, G. D. (2009). VSC-based HVDC power transmission systems: An overview. IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, 24: 592–602.
DOI Google Scholar
[104]

Alassi, A., Bañales, S., Ellabban, O., Adam, G., MacIver, C. (2019). HVDC transmission: Technology review, market trends and future outlook. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 112: 530–554.
DOI Google Scholar
[105]

Sayah, S. (2018). Modified differential evolution approach for practical optimal reactive power dispatch of hybrid AC–DC power systems. Applied Soft Computing, 73: 591–606.
DOI Google Scholar
[106]

Zhou, M., Zhai, J., Li, G., Ren, J. (2018). Distributed dispatch approach for bulk AC/DC hybrid systems with high wind power penetration. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 33: 3325–3336.
DOI Google Scholar
[107]

Conejo, A. J., Morales, J. M., Baringo, L. (2010). Real-time demand response model. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 1: 236–242.
DOI Google Scholar
[108]

O׳Connell, N., Pinson, P., Madsen, H., O׳Malley, M. (2014). Benefits and challenges of electrical demand response: A critical review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 39: 686–699.
DOI Google Scholar
[109]

Albadi, M. H., El-Saadany, E. F. (2008). A summary of demand response in electricity markets. Electric Power Systems Research, 78: 1989–1996.
DOI Google Scholar
[110]

Siano, P. (2014). Demand response and smart grids—a survey. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 30: 461–478.
DOI Google Scholar
[111]

Mashhour, E., Moghaddas-Tafreshi, S. M. (2011). Bidding strategy of virtual power plant for participating in energy and spinning reserve markets—Part I: Problem formulation. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 26: 949–956.
DOI Google Scholar
[112]

Koraki, D., Strunz, K. (2017). Wind and solar power integration in electricity markets and distribution networks through service-centric virtual power plants. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 33: 473–485.
DOI Google Scholar
[113]

Baringo, A., Baringo, L., Arroyo, J. M. (2019). Day-ahead self-scheduling of a virtual power plant in energy and reserve electricity markets under uncertainty. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 34: 1881–1894.
DOI Google Scholar
[114]

Babaei, S., Zhao, C., Fan, L. (2019). A data-driven model of virtual power plants in day-ahead unit commitment. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 34: 5125–5135.
DOI Google Scholar
[115]

Kardakos, E. G., Simoglou, C. K., Bakirtzis, A. G. (2016). Optimal offering strategy of a virtual power plant: A stochastic Bi-level approach. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 7: 794–806.
DOI Google Scholar
[116]

Behar, O., Khellaf, A., Mohammedi, K. (2013). A review of studies on central receiver solar thermal power plants. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 23: 12–39.
DOI Google Scholar
[117]

Du, E., Zhang, N., Hodge, B. M., Wang, Q., Kang, C., Kroposki, B., Xia, Q. (2018). The role of concentrating solar power toward high renewable energy penetrated power systems. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 33: 6630–6641.
DOI Google Scholar
[118]

Chen, R., Sun, H., Guo, Q., Li, Z., Deng, T., Wu, W., Zhang, B. (2015). Reducing generation uncertainty by integrating CSP with wind power: An adaptive robust optimization-based analysis. IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy, 6: 583–594.
DOI Google Scholar
[119]

Chen, Q., Kang, C., Xia, Q. (2010). Modeling flexible operation mechanism of CO2 capture power plant and its effects on power-system operation. IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion, 25: 853–861.
DOI Google Scholar
[120]

Gibbins, J., Chalmers, H. (2008). Carbon capture and storage. Energy Policy, 36: 4317–4322.
DOI Google Scholar
[121]

Chen, Q., Kang, C., Xia, Q., Kirschen, D. S. (2012). Optimal flexible operation of a CO $2$ capture power plant in a combined energy and carbon emission market. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 27: 1602–1609.
DOI Google Scholar
[122]

Huang, W., Zhang, N., Cheng, Y., Yang, J., Wang, Y., Kang, C. (2020). Multienergy networks analytics: Standardized modeling, optimization, and low carbon analysis. Proceedings of the IEEE, 108: 1411–1436.
DOI Google Scholar
[123]

Mancarella, P. (2014). MES (multi-energy systems): An overview of concepts and evaluation models. Energy, 65: 1–17.
DOI Google Scholar
[124]

Geidl, M., Koeppel, G., Favre-Perrod, P., Klockl, B., Andersson, G., Frohlich, K. (2007). Energy hubs for the future. IEEE Power and Energy Magazine, 5: 24–30.
DOI Google Scholar
[125]

Yan, M., Zhang, N., Ai, X., Shahidehpour, M., Kang, C., Wen, J. (2019). Robust two-stage regional-district scheduling of multi-carrier energy systems with a large penetration of wind power. IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy, 10: 1227–1239.
DOI Google Scholar
[126]

Evins, R., Orehounig, K., Dorer, V., Carmeliet, J. (2014). New formulations of the ‘energy hub’ model to address operational constraints. Energy, 73: 387–398.
DOI Google Scholar
[127]

Mohammadi, M., Noorollahi, Y., Mohammadi-ivatloo, B., Yousefi, H. (2017). Energy hub: From a model to a concept–A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 80: 1512–1527.
DOI Google Scholar
[128]

Wang, Y., Zhang, N., Kang, C., Kirschen, D. S., Yang, J., Xia, Q. (2019). Standardized matrix modeling of multiple energy systems. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 10: 257–270.
DOI Google Scholar
[129]

Yang, J., Zhang, N., Botterud, A., Kang, C. (2020). On an equivalent representation of the dynamics in district heating networks for combined electricity-heat operation. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 35: 560–570.
DOI Google Scholar
[130]

Yang, J., Zhang, N., Botterud, A., Kang, C. (2020). Situation awareness of electricity-gas coupled systems with a multi-port equivalent gas network model. Applied Energy, 258: 114029.
DOI Google Scholar
[131]

Li, Z., Wu, W., Shahidehpour, M., Wang, J., Zhang, B. (2016). Combined heat and power dispatch considering pipeline energy storage of district heating network. IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy, 7: 12–22.
DOI Google Scholar
[132]
Zlotnik, A., Roald, L., Backhaus, S., Chertkov, M., Andersson, G. (2017). Coordinated scheduling for interdependent electric power and natural gas infrastructures. In: Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE Manchester PowerTech, Manchester, UK.
DOI
[133]

Dyke, K. J., Schofield, N., Barnes, M. (2010). The impact of transport electrification on electrical networks. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 57: 3917–3926.
DOI Google Scholar
[134]

Lund, H., Kempton, W. (2008). Integration of renewable energy into the transport and electricity sectors through V2G. Energy Policy, 36: 3578–3587.
DOI Google Scholar
[135]

Bae, S., Kwasinski, A. (2012). Spatial and temporal model of electric vehicle charging demand. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 3: 394–403.
DOI Google Scholar
[136]

Wu, D., Aliprantis, D. C., Ying, L. (2012). Load scheduling and dispatch for aggregators of plug-In electric vehicles. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 3: 368–376.
DOI Google Scholar
[137]

He, Y., Venkatesh, B., Guan, L. (2012). Optimal scheduling for charging and discharging of electric vehicles. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 3: 1095–1105.
DOI Google Scholar
[138]

Sortomme, E., El-Sharkawi, M. A. (2012). Optimal scheduling of vehicle-to-grid energy and ancillary services. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 3: 351–359.
DOI Google Scholar
[139]

Wei, W., Mei, S., Wu, L., Shahidehpour, M., Fang, Y. (2017). Optimal traffic-power flow in urban electrified transportation networks. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 8: 84–95.
DOI Google Scholar
[140]

Aguado, J. A., Sánchez Racero, A. J., de la Torre, S. (2018). Optimal operation of electric railways with renewable energy and electric storage systems. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 9: 993–1001.
DOI Google Scholar
[141]

Hou, Q., Du, E., Zhang, N., Kang, C. (2020). Impact of high renewable penetration on the power system operation mode: A data-driven approach. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 35: 731–741.
DOI Google Scholar
[142]

Shah, R., Mithulananthan, N., Bansal, R. C., Ramachandaramurthy, V. K. (2015). A review of key power system stability challenges for large-scale PV integration. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 41: 1423–1436.
DOI Google Scholar
[143]

Gautam, D., Vittal, V., Harbour, T. (2009). Impact of increased penetration of DFIG-based wind turbine generators on transient and small signal stability of power systems. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 24: 1426–1434.
DOI Google Scholar
[144]

Xue, A., Wu, F. F., Lu, Q., Mei, S. (2006). Power system dynamic security region and its approximations. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I: Regular Papers, 53: 2849–2859.
DOI Google Scholar
[145]

Lin, W., Yang, Z., Yu, J., Xie, K., Wang, X., Li, W. (2021). Tie-line security region considering time coupling. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 36: 1274–1284.
DOI Google Scholar
[146]

Chu, Z., Teng, F. (2021). Short circuit current constrained UC in high IBG-penetrated power systems. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 36: 3776–3785.
DOI Google Scholar
[147]

Hou, Q., Zhang, N., Kirschen, D. S., Du, E., Cheng, Y., Kang, C. (2021). Sparse oblique decision tree for power system security rules extraction and embedding. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 36: 1605–1615.
DOI Google Scholar
[148]

Zhang, Z., Du, E., Teng, F., Zhang, N., Kang, C. (2020). Modeling frequency dynamics in unit commitment with a high share of renewable energy. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 35: 4383–4395.
DOI Google Scholar
[149]

Badesa, L., Teng, F., Strbac, G. (2019). Simultaneous scheduling of multiple frequency services in stochastic unit commitment. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 34: 3858–3868.
DOI Google Scholar
[150]

Chávez, H., Baldick, R., Sharma, S. (2014). Governor rate-constrained OPF for primary frequency control adequacy. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 29: 1473–1480.
DOI Google Scholar
[151]

Teng, F., Trovato, V., Strbac, G. (2016). Stochastic scheduling with inertia-dependent fast frequency response requirements. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 31: 1557–1566.
DOI Google Scholar
[152]

Ahmadi, H., Ghasemi, H. (2014). Security-constrained unit commitment with linearized system frequency limit constraints. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 29: 1536–1545.
DOI Google Scholar
[153]

Lagos, D. T., Hatziargyriou, N. D. (2021). Data-driven frequency dynamic unit commitment for island systems with high RES penetration. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 36: 4699–4711.
DOI Google Scholar
[154]

Iba, K., Suzuki, H., Egawa, M., Watanabe, T. (1991). Calculation of critical loading condition with nose curve using homotopy continuation method. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 6: 584–593.
DOI Google Scholar
[155]

Zhang, F., Xin, H., Wu, D., Wang, Z., Gan, D. (2019). Assessing strength of multi-infeed LCC-HVDC systems using generalized short-circuit ratio. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 34: 467–480.
DOI Google Scholar
[156]

Alzaareer, K., Saad, M., Mehrjerdi, H., Ziad El-Bayeh, C., Asber, D., Lefebvre, S. (2020). A new sensitivity approach for preventive control selection in real-time voltage stability assessment. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, 122: 106212.
DOI Google Scholar
[157]

Cui, B., Sun, X. A. (2018). A new voltage stability-constrained optimal power-flow model: Sufficient condition, SOCP representation, and relaxation. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 33: 5092–5102.
DOI Google Scholar
[158]

Jia, H., Hou, Q., Yong, P., Liu, Y., Zhang, N., Liu, D., Hou, M. (2023). Voltage stability constrained operation optimization: An ensemble sparse oblique regression tree method. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, PP: 1–13.
DOI Google Scholar
[159]

Hatziargyriou, N., Milanovic, J., Rahmann, C., Ajjarapu, V., Canizares, C., Erlich, I., Hill, D., Hiskens, I., Kamwa, I., Pal, B., et al. (2020). Definition and classification of power system stability–revisited & extended. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 36: 3271–3281.
DOI Google Scholar
[160]
Zhang, N., Jia, H., Hou, Q., Zhang, Z., Xia, T., Cai, X., Wang, J. (2022). Data-driven security and stability rule in high renewable penetrated power system operation. Proceedings of the IEEE, https://doi.org/10.1109/JPROC.2022.3192719.
DOI
[161]

Cremer, J. L., Konstantelos, I., Strbac, G. (2019). From optimization-based machine learning to interpretable security rules for operation. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 34: 3826–3836.
DOI Google Scholar
[162]

Yuan, H., Xu, Y., Zhang, C. (2022). Robustly coordinated generation dispatch and load shedding for power systems against transient instability under uncertain wind power. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 37: 1032–1043.
DOI Google Scholar
[163]

Wang, C., Gao, R., Qiu, F., Wang, J., Xin, L. (2018). Risk-based distributionally robust optimal power flow with dynamic line rating. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 33: 6074–6086.
DOI Google Scholar
[164]

Zheng, Q. P., Wang, J., Liu, A. L. (2015). Stochastic optimization for unit commitment—a review. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 30: 1913–1924.
DOI Google Scholar
[165]

Li, J., Zhou, J., Chen, B. (2020). Review of wind power scenario generation methods for optimal operation of renewable energy systems. Applied Energy, 280: 115992.
DOI Google Scholar
[166]

Takriti, S., Birge, J. R., Long, E. (1996). A stochastic model for the unit commitment problem. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 11: 1497–1508.
DOI Google Scholar
[167]

Wu, L., Shahidehpour, M., Li, T. (2007). Stochastic security-constrained unit commitment. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 22: 800–811.
DOI Google Scholar
[168]
Growe-Kuska, N., Heitsch, H., Romisch, W. (2004). Scenario reduction and scenario tree construction for power management problems. In: Proceedings of the 2003 IEEE Bologna Power Tech Conference, Bologna, Italy.
[169]

Hu, J., Li, H. (2019). A new clustering approach for scenario reduction in multi-stochastic variable programming. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 34: 3813–3825.
DOI Google Scholar
[170]

Ozturk, U. A., Mazumdar, M., Norman, B. A. (2004). A solution to the stochastic unit commitment problem using chance constrained programming. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 19: 1589–1598.
DOI Google Scholar
[171]

Wang, Q., Guan, Y., Wang, J. (2012). A chance-constrained two-stage stochastic program for unit commitment with uncertain wind power output. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 27: 206–215.
DOI Google Scholar
[172]

Jabr, R. A. (2005). Robust self-scheduling under price uncertainty using conditional value-at-risk. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 20: 1852–1858.
DOI Google Scholar
[173]

Huang, Y., Zheng, Q. P., Wang, J. (2014). Two-stage stochastic unit commitment model including non-generation resources with conditional value-at-risk constraints. Electric Power Systems Research, 116: 427–438.
DOI Google Scholar
[174]

Guan, Y., & Wang, J. (2013). Uncertainty sets for robust unit commitment. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 29: 1439–1440.
DOI Google Scholar
[175]

Bertsimas, D., Litvinov, E., Sun, X., Zhao, J., Zheng, T. (2013). Adaptive robust optimization for the security constrained unit commitment problem. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 28: 52–63.
DOI Google Scholar
[176]

Zhao, Z., Liu, Y., Guo, L., Bai, L., Wang, C. (2021). Locational marginal pricing mechanism for uncertainty management based on improved multi-ellipsoidal uncertainty set. Journal of Modern Power Systems and Clean Energy, 9: 734–750.
DOI Google Scholar
[177]

Street, A., Oliveira, F., Arroyo, J. M. (2010). Contingency-constrained unit commitment with n−K security criterion: A robust optimization approach. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 26: 1581–1590.
DOI Google Scholar
[178]

Li, Z., Wu, W., Shahidehpour, M., Zhang, B. (2016). Adaptive robust tie-line scheduling considering wind power uncertainty for interconnected power systems. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 31: 2701–2713.
DOI Google Scholar
[179]
Lorca, A., Sun, A. (2014). Adaptive robust optimization with dynamic uncertainty sets for multi-period economic dispatch under significant wind. arXiv preprint: 1409.2936.
DOI
[180]

Duan, C., Fang, W., Jiang, L., Yao, L., Liu, J. (2018). Distributionally robust chance-constrained approximate AC-OPF with Wasserstein metric. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 33: 4924–4936.
DOI Google Scholar
[181]

Guo, Y., Baker, K., Dall’Anese, E., Hu, Z., Summers, T. (2018). Data-based distributionally robust stochastic optimal power flow—Part I: Methodologies. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 34: 1483–1492.
DOI Google Scholar
[182]

Xiong, P., Jirutitijaroen, P., Singh, C. (2017). A distributionally robust optimization model for unit commitment considering uncertain wind power generation. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 32: 39–49.
DOI Google Scholar
[183]

Zhang, Y., Shen, S., Mathieu, J. L. (2017). Distributionally robust chance-constrained optimal power flow with uncertain renewables and uncertain reserves provided by loads. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 32: 1378–1388.
DOI Google Scholar
[184]

Yutaka, S., Naoto, Y., Yoshifumi, Z., Farid, W. (2018). Robust stochastic dynamic load dispatch against uncertainties. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 9: 5535–5542.
DOI Google Scholar
[185]

Chang, X., Xu, Y., Gu, W., Sun, H., Chow, M. Y., Yi, Z. (2021). Accelerated distributed hybrid stochastic/robust energy management of smart grids. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 17: 5335–5347.
DOI Google Scholar
[186]

Liu, C., Lee, C., Chen, H., Mehrotra, S. (2015). Stochastic robust mathematical programming model for power system optimization. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 31: 821–822.
DOI Google Scholar
[187]

Shen, C., Cao, Q., Jia, M., Chen, Y., Huang, S. (2022). Concepts, characteristics and prospects of application of digital twin in power system. (in Chinese). Proceedings of the CSEE, 42: 487–498.
Google Scholar
[188]

Zhang, Z., Zhang, D., Qiu, R. C. (2019). Deep reinforcement learning for power system applications: An overview. CSEE Journal of Power and Energy Systems, 6: 213–225.
Google Scholar
[189]

Fan, Z., Yang, Z., Xie, K., Yu, J. (2021). General steady-state modeling and linearization of power electronic devices in AC-DC hybrid grid. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 36: 5746–5755.
DOI Google Scholar
[190]

Zhang, H., Heydt, G. T., Vittal, V., Quintero, J. (2013). An improved network model for transmission expansion planning considering reactive power and network losses. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 28: 3471–3479.
DOI Google Scholar
[191]

Liu, Y., Xu, B., Botterud, A., Zhang, N., Kang, C. (2021). Bounding regression errors in data-driven power grid steady-state models. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 36: 1023–1033.
DOI Google Scholar
[192]
Ela, E., Hytowitz, R. B. (2019). Ancillary Services in the United States: Technical Requirements, Market Designs and Price Trends. Available at: https://www.offshorewindadvisory.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/EPRI-Ancillary-Services.pdf.
[193]

Zhao, C., Wan, C., Song, Y. (2021). Operating reserve quantification using prediction intervals of wind power: An integrated probabilistic forecasting and decision methodology. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 36: 3701–3714.
DOI Google Scholar
[194]

Zhang, G., McCalley, J. D. (2018). Estimation of regulation reserve requirement based on control performance standard. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 33: 1173–1183.
DOI Google Scholar
[195]

Xiang, M., Yang, Z., Yu, J., Wang, G. (2023). Determination and cost allocation for regulation reserve with renewables: A data-driven assisted approach. IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy, 14: 813–825.
DOI Google Scholar
[196]

Shi, Q., Li, F., Cui, H. (2018). Analytical method to aggregate multi-machine SFR model with applications in power system dynamic studies. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 33: 6355–6367.
DOI Google Scholar
[197]
Liu, L., Hu, Z., Wen, Y., Ma, Y. (2023). Modeling of frequency security constraints and quantification of frequency control reserve capacities for unit commitment. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, https://doi.org/10.1109/TPWRS.2023.3252502.
DOI
[198]

Huang, J., Yang, Z., Yu, J., Xiong, L., Xu, Y. (2022). Frequency dynamics-constrained parameter design for fast frequency controller of wind turbine. IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy, 13: 31–43.
DOI Google Scholar
[199]

Saddique, M. S., Bhatti, A. R., Haroon, S. S., Sattar, M. K., Amin, S., Ali Sajjad, I., ul Haq, S. S., Awan, A. B., Rasheed, N. (2020). Solution to optimal reactive power dispatch in transmission system using meta-heuristic techniques―Status and technological review. Electric Power Systems Research, 178: 106031.
DOI Google Scholar
[200]

P, Girish, Y. Thangaraj, Raju, H. (2018). Solution for economic load dispatch problem using optimization algorithm -Review. International Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics, 119: 263–269.
Google Scholar
[201]
Achterberg, T., Wunderling, R. Mixed integer programming: Analyzing 12 years of progress. Facets of Combinatorial Optimization. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 2013: 449-481.
DOI
[202]

Yan, W., Yu, J., Yu, D. C., Bhattarai, K. (2006). A new optimal reactive power flow model in rectangular form and its solution by predictor corrector primal dual interior point method. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 21: 61–67.
DOI Google Scholar
[203]

Duvvuru, N., Swarup, K. S. (2011). A hybrid interior point assisted differential evolution algorithm for economic dispatch. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 26: 541–549.
DOI Google Scholar
[204]

Nelder, J. A., Mead, R. (1965). A simplex method for function minimization. The Computer Journal, 7: 308–313.
DOI Google Scholar
[205]

Zandavi, S. M., Chung, V. Y. Y., Anaissi, A. (2021). Stochastic dual simplex algorithm: A novel heuristic optimization algorithm. IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics, 51: 2725–2734.
DOI Google Scholar
[206]
Gurobi Optimization. (2022). What’s new—Gurobi 10.0. Available at: https://www.gurobi.com/whats-new-gurobi-10-0/.
[207]

Sun, X., Luh, P. B., Bragin, M. A., Chen, Y., Wan, J., Wang, F. (2018). A novel decomposition and coordination approach for large day-ahead unit commitment with combined cycle units. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 33: 5297–5308.
DOI Google Scholar
[208]

Ceyhan, G., Köksalan, M., Lokman, B. (2022). Extensions for Benders cuts and new valid inequalities for solving the European day-ahead electricity market clearing problem efficiently. European Journal of Operational Research, 300: 713–726.
DOI Google Scholar
[209]

Zhang, M., Yang, Z., Lin, W., Yu, J., Dai, W., Du, E. (2021). Enhancing economics of power systems through fast unit commitment with high time resolution. Applied Energy, 281: 116051.
DOI Google Scholar
[210]

Ji, X., Zhang, Y., Han, X., Ye, P., Xu, B., Yu, Y. (2021). Multi-level interactive unit commitment of regional power system. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, 125: 106464.
DOI Google Scholar
[211]

Gao, Q., Yang, Z., Yin, W., Li, W., Yu, J. (2022). Internally induced branch-and-cut acceleration for unit commitment based on improvement of upper bound. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 37: 2455–2458.
DOI Google Scholar
[212]
Gao, Q., Yang, Z., Li, W., Yu, J., Lu, Y. (2023). Online learning of stable integer variables in unit commitment using internal information, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, https://doi.org/10.1109/TPWRS.2023.3258699.
DOI
[213]
Bauer, S. (2020). High-performance computing helps grid operators manage increasing complexity. Available at: https://www.pnnl.gov/news-media/high-performance-computing-helps-grid-operators-manage-increasing-complexity.
Publication history
Copyright
Rights and permissions

Publication history

Received: 14 February 2023
Revised: 08 April 2023
Accepted: 16 April 2023
Published: 01 March 2023
Issue date: March 2023

Copyright

© The author(s) 2023.

Rights and permissions

This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

Return