Journal Home > Volume 3 , Issue 2

This paper proposes a wireless network traffic prediction model based on long-term and short-term memory cyclic neural networks. Through simulation experiments, the throughput prediction of 5G wireless networks using different scheduling algorithms for many different types of services is studied. The results verify that the long short-term memory prediction model has acceptable prediction accuracy and algorithm training speed, meets the needs of wireless network traffic prediction, and has a good application prospect.


menu
Abstract
Full text
Outline
About this article

Research on throughput prediction of 5G network based on LSTM

Show Author's information Lanlan Li1( )Tao Ye2
Purple Mountain Labs, Nanjing 210000, China
China Communications Construction Second Harbor Engineering Company Ltd., Wuhan 430040, China

Abstract

This paper proposes a wireless network traffic prediction model based on long-term and short-term memory cyclic neural networks. Through simulation experiments, the throughput prediction of 5G wireless networks using different scheduling algorithms for many different types of services is studied. The results verify that the long short-term memory prediction model has acceptable prediction accuracy and algorithm training speed, meets the needs of wireless network traffic prediction, and has a good application prospect.

Keywords: long short-term memory (LSTM), wireless network, schedule, flow forecast, throughput

References(22)

1
Overall description, Stage-2, version 15.9.0, 3GPP TS 38.300 NR, 2020.
2
System architecture for the 5G System (5GS), version 15.9.0, 3GPP TS 23.501, 2020.
3
R. Agustí, Radio resource management in beyond 3G systems, in Proc. 2006 IEEE Mediterranean Electrotechnical Conference, Malaga, Spain, 2006, pp. 569–574.
4

M. Mudelsee, Trend analysis of climate time series: A review of methods, Earth-Science Reviews, vol. 190, pp. 310–322, 2019.

5

D. S. Stoffer and H. Ombao, Editorial: Special issue on time series analysis in the biological sciences, Journal of Time Series Analysis, vol. 33, no. 5, pp. 701–703, 2012.

6

E. J. Topol, High-performance medicine: The convergence of human and artificial intelligence, Nature Medicine, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 44–56, 2019.

7

J. -H. Böse, V. Flunkert, J. Gasthaus, T. Januschowski, D. Lange, D. Salinas, S. Schelter, M. Seeger, and Y. Wang, Probabilistic demand forecasting at scale, Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment, vol. 10, no. 12, pp. 1694–1705, 2017.

8
T. G. Andersen, T. Bollerslev, P. Christoffersen, F. X. Diebold, Volatility forecasting, SSRN Electronic Journal, doi: 10.2139/ssrn.673405.
DOI
9
T. J. Bowles and W. C. Lewis, A comparison of time series forecasting models, presented at the Annual Meetings of the Western Economic Association International, Denver, CO, USA, 2003.
10
G. E. P. Box and G. M. Jenkins, Time Series Analysis: Forecasting and Control. San Francisco, CA, USA: Holden-Day, 1976.
11

E. S. Gardner Jr., Exponential smoothing: The state of the art, Journal of Forecasting, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 1–28, 1985.

12

P. R. Winters, Forecasting sales by exponentially weighted moving averages, Management Science, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 324–342, 1960.

13
A. C. Harvey, Forecasting, Structural Time Series Models and the Kalman Filter. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1990.
DOI
14

N. K. Ahmed, A. F. Atiya, N. E. Gayar, and H. El-Shishiny, An empirical comparison of machine learning models for time series forecasting, Econometric Reviews, vol. 29, nos. 5&6, pp. 594–621, 2010.

15

S. Hochreiter and J. Schmidhuber, Long short-term memory, Neural Computation, vol. 9, no. 8, pp. 1735–1780, 1997.

16
Physical layer procedures for data, version 15.9.0, 3GPP TS 38.214 NR, 2020.
17
D. Zavyalova and V. Drozdova, 5G scheduling using reinforcement learning, in Proc. 2020 International Multi-Conference on Industrial Engineering and Modern Technologies (FarEastCon), Vladivostok, Russia, 2020, pp. 1–5.
DOI
18
M. Liang and X. Wang, Application of 5G-based mobile communication technology in network resource scheduling, in Proc. 2019 International Conference on Smart Grid and Electrical Automation (ICSGEA), Xiangtan, China, 2019, pp. 102–105.
DOI
19

I. -S. Comşa, S. Zhang, M. E. Aydin, P. Kuonen, Y. Lu, R. Trestian, and G. Ghinea, Towards 5G: A reinforcement learning-based scheduling solution for data traffic management, IEEE Transactions on Network and Service Management, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 1661–1675, 2018.

20
Y. Li, Y. Wang, Y. Jin, X. Cheng, L. Xu, and G. Liu, Research on wireless resource management and scheduling for 5G network slice, in Proc. 2021 International Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing (IWCMC), Harbin, China, 2021, pp. 508–513.
DOI
21
22

S. Pratschner, B. Tahir, L. Marijanovic, M. Mussbah, K. Kirev, R. Nissel, S. Schwarz, and M. Rupp, Versatile mobile communications simulation: The Vienna 5G link level simulator, EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking, vol. 2018, no. 1, p. 226, 2018.

Publication history
Copyright
Rights and permissions

Publication history

Received: 17 February 2022
Revised: 03 March 2022
Accepted: 21 March 2022
Published: 06 September 2022
Issue date: June 2022

Copyright

© All articles included in the journal are copyrighted to the ITU and TUP.

Rights and permissions

This work is available under the CC BY-NC-ND 3.0 IGO license: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/igo/

Return