182
Views
14
Downloads
7
Crossref
N/A
WoS
6
Scopus
0
CSCD
The high-frequency (HF) modeling of induction motors plays a key role in predicting the motor terminal overvoltage and conducted emissions in a motor drive system. In this study, a physics informed neural network-based HF modeling method, which has the merits of high accuracy, good versatility, and simple parameterization, is proposed. The proposed model of the induction motor consists of a three-phase equivalent circuit with eighteen circuit elements per phase to ensure model accuracy. The per phase circuit structure is symmetric concerning its phase-start and phase-end points. This symmetry enables the proposed model to be applicable for both star- and delta-connected induction motors without having to recalculate the circuit element values when changing the motor connection from star to delta and vice versa. Motor physics knowledge, namely per-phase impedances, are used in the artificial neural network to obtain the values of the circuit elements. The parameterization can be easily implemented within a few minutes using a common personal computer (PC). Case studies verify the effectiveness of the proposed HF modeling method.
The high-frequency (HF) modeling of induction motors plays a key role in predicting the motor terminal overvoltage and conducted emissions in a motor drive system. In this study, a physics informed neural network-based HF modeling method, which has the merits of high accuracy, good versatility, and simple parameterization, is proposed. The proposed model of the induction motor consists of a three-phase equivalent circuit with eighteen circuit elements per phase to ensure model accuracy. The per phase circuit structure is symmetric concerning its phase-start and phase-end points. This symmetry enables the proposed model to be applicable for both star- and delta-connected induction motors without having to recalculate the circuit element values when changing the motor connection from star to delta and vice versa. Motor physics knowledge, namely per-phase impedances, are used in the artificial neural network to obtain the values of the circuit elements. The parameterization can be easily implemented within a few minutes using a common personal computer (PC). Case studies verify the effectiveness of the proposed HF modeling method.
S Amarir, K Al-Haddad. A modeling technique to analyze the impact of inverter supply voltage and cable length on industrial motor-drives. IEEE Trans. Power Electron., 2008, 23(2): 753-762.
M Ghassemi. Accelerated insulation aging due to fast, repetitive voltages: A review identifying challenges and future research needs. IEEE Trans. Dielectr. Electr. Insul., 2019, 26(5): 1558-1568.
Z Zhang, Y Hu, X Chen, et al. A review on conductive common-mode EMI suppression methods in inverter fed motor drives. IEEE Access, 2021, 9: 18345-18360.
G Grandi, D Casadei, U Reggiani. Common- and differential-mode HF current components in AC motors supplied by voltage source inverters. IEEE Trans. Power Electron., 2004, 19(1): 16-24.
L Ran, S Gokani, J Clare, et al. Conducted electromagnetic emissions in induction motor drive systems Ⅰ: Time domain analysis and identification of dominant modes. IEEE Trans. Power Electron., 1998, 13(4): 757-767.
M M Swamy, K Yamada, T Kume. Common mode current attenuation techniques for use with PWM drives. IEEE Trans. Power Electron., 2001, 16(2): 248-255.
L Wang, C N Ho, F Canales, et al. High-frequency modeling of the long-cable-fed induction motor drive system using TLM approach for predicting overvoltage transients. IEEE Trans. Power Electron., 2010, 25(10): 2653-2664.
G Suresh, A Toliyat, A Rendusara, et al. Predicting the transient effects of PWM voltage waveform on the stator windings of random wound induction motors. IEEE Trans. Power Electron., 1999, 14(1): 23-30.
V Mihaila, S Duchesne, D Roger. A simulation method to predict the turn-to-turn voltage spikes in a PWM fed motor winding. IEEE Trans. Dielectr. Electr. Insul., 2011, 18(5): 1609-1615.
Y Ryu, M Yea, J Kim, et al. Stator impedance modeling platform for the electromagnetic compatibility aware design of 3.7-to 7.5-kW squirrel-cage induction motors. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., 2021, 68(11): 11255-11265.
L Ran, S Gokani, J Clare, et al. Conducted electromagnetic emissions in induction motor drive systems part Ⅱ: Frequency domain models. IEEE Trans. Power Electron., 1998, 13(4): 768-776.
F Fan, K Y See, X Liu, et al. Systematic common-mode filter design for inverter-driven motor system based on in-circuit impedance extraction. IEEE Trans. Electromagn. Compat., 2020, 62(5): 1711-1722.
F Costa, C Vollaire, R Meuret. Modeling of conducted common mode perturbations in variable-speed drive systems. IEEE Trans. Electromagn. Compat., 2005, 47(4): 1012-1021.
A F Moreira, T A Lipo, G Venkataramanan, et al. High-frequency modeling for cable and induction motor overvoltage studies in long cable drives. IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl., 2002, 38(5):1297-1306.
A Boglietti, A Cavagnino, M Lazzari. Experimental high-frequency parameter identification of AC electrical motors. IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl., 2007, 43(1): 23-29.
J Sun, L Xing. Parameterization of three-phase electric machine models for EMI simulation. IEEE Trans. Power Electron., 2014, 29(1): 36-41.
M S Toulabi, L Wang, L Bieber, et al. A universal high-frequency induction machine model and characterization method for arbitrary stator winding connections. IEEE Trans. Energy Convers., 2019, 34(3): 1164-1177.
B Mirafzal, G Skibinski, R Tallam. Determination of parameters in the universal induction motor model. IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl., 2009, 45(1): 142-151.
V Karakaşlı, F Gross, T Braun, et al. High-frequency modeling of delta- and star-connected induction motors. IEEE Trans. Electromagn. Compat., 2022, 64(4): 1533-1544.
M Degano, P Zanchetta, L Empringham, et al. HF induction motor modeling using automated experimental impedance measurement matching. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., 2012, 59(10): 3789-3796.
H Chen, S Ye. Modeling of common-mode impedance of an inverter-fed induction motor from online measurement. IEEE Trans. Electromagn. Compat., 2018, 60(5): 1581-1589.