AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (1.7 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Open Access

Understanding and Thinking about "Technical Standard for Building Engineering against Uplift"

Dongfeng Zhu1,2, Chiyu Luo1, Jianfeng Li1( )
Guangdong Architectural Design and Research Institute Co., Ltd., Guangzhou 510010, P. R. China
School of Civil Engineering and Transportation, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510640, P. R. China
Show Author Information

Abstract

In view of some problems in the industrial standard "Technical standard for building engineering against uplift (JGJ 476—2019)", this paper presents understanding and thinking. For projects with anti-uplifting design grade A, this standard adds a lot of work content, among which the prediction of underground water level in the service period is a difficulty. The accumulation of basic data and the establishment of groundwater numerical analysis model are feasible approaches. It is not entirely appropriate for the standard to link the anti-uplifting design grade with the foundation design grade. In addition to the overall anti-uplifting stability checking calculation, the "unit anti-uplift stability checking calculation" for the weak parts of the underground structures should also be carried out, which should be considered in combination with the strength and deformation check of the floor. Under the condition of artesian water, the hydraulic head value of most areas of basement floor is the same as that of artesian water. The concept of cross section calculation formula of anti-uplifting bolt reinforcement is not clear. When adopting the active anti-uplifting method, the adaptability of stratum and environment should be fully considered. The problems of soil retention and clogging performance, seepage calculation of the drainage blind ditch and the durability of cutoff wall should be studied more deeply.

CLC number: TU46 Document code: A Article ID: 1673-0836(2022)02-0628-07

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
Chinese Journal of Underground Space and Engineering
Pages 628-634

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
Zhu D, Luo C, Li J. Understanding and Thinking about "Technical Standard for Building Engineering against Uplift". Chinese Journal of Underground Space and Engineering, 2022, 18(2): 628-634. https://doi.org/10.20174/j.juse.2022.02.032

474

Views

3

Downloads

0

Crossref

0

Scopus

0

CSCD

Received: 07 October 2021
Published: 01 April 2022
© 2022 Chinese Journal of Underground Space and Engineering

This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).