AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (1.1 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Publishing Language: Chinese | Open Access

Concentration levels, sources and health risk assessment of atmospheric polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons

Liang LUO1Kaitao CHEN1Yifan YANG2Zhongyi YIN1Shili TIAN2( )Xingru LI1( )
Analytical Testing Center, Department of Chemistry, Capital Normal University, Beijing 100048
Institute of Analysis and Testing, Beijing Academy of Science and Technology (Beijing Center of Physical & Chemical Analysis), Beijing 100083
Show Author Information

Abstract

Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) mainly from the incomplete combustion of organic materials, and are bioaccumulative and toxic(carcinogenic, teratogenic and mutagenic), are a kind of persistent toxic substance. This paper reviews the classification, emission characteristics, temporal and spatial distribution characteristics, source analysis and health risk assessment of atmospheric PAHs, and lists the ways of classifying PAHs according to different molecular weight, existence form and chemical structure. It is pointed out that PAHs concentration presents seasonal variation, and the variation trend is from high to low: winter, spring, autumn and summer. The advantages and disadvantages of molecular diagnostic ratio (DRs) and receptor models, including principal component analysis(PCA), chemical mass balance(CMB), positive matrix factorization (PMF)and Unmix were compared. Source analysis shows that DRs and PCA are the most widely used methods, but the accuracy of source analysis results is affected by many factors. The combination of PMF and Unmix to resolve PAHs sources can assign sources based solely on measured concentrations at the receptor site, providing a time series of PAHs source contributions and making up for the limitations that require human interpretation. This paper shows how the incremental lifetime cancer risk (ILCR)model can be used to assign sources of PAHs to assess health risk, and identify key factors that affect the accuracy of ILCR. We hope this review can provide reference for further research on atmospheric PAHs pollution.

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
Journal of Capital Normal University (Natural Science Edition)
Pages 121-131

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
LUO L, CHEN K, YANG Y, et al. Concentration levels, sources and health risk assessment of atmospheric polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. Journal of Capital Normal University (Natural Science Edition), 2024, 45(3): 121-131. https://doi.org/10.19789/j.1004-9398.2024.03.011

733

Views

6

Downloads

0

Crossref

Received: 23 October 2023
Published: 01 June 2024
© The editorial department of Journal of Capital Normal University (Natural Science Edition) 2025.

This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).