AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (14.1 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Research Article | Publishing Language: Chinese | Open Access

Hydrochemistry and microbial community of different aquifers in coal mining areas and their environmental responses

Rongcan Liu1,2, Yuan Li1,2( ), Huiming Fang1,2
General Prospecting Institute of China National Administration of Coal Geology, Beijing 100039, China
Key Laboratory of Transparent Mine Geology and Digital Twin Technology, National Mine Safety Administration, Beijing 100039, China
Show Author Information

Abstract

This study explores the hydrochemistry and microbial communities in groundwater from mining areas and their environmental responses. We took a mining area in Erdos, Inner Mongolia as example for analysis, where 23 samples were collected from groundwater in different aquifers, water accumulated in the mined-out area, and roof water to conduct hydrochemical analysis and 16S rDNA high-throughput gene sequencing. Results show that groundwater in different aquifers varied considerably in their hydrochemical types: water samples from the Quaternary and Cretaceous systems were mainly of HCO3-Ca·Mg and HCO3-Na types, while those from the Jurassic system and mined-out areas were of SO4-Na type. Quaternary groundwater exhibited the highest microbial community diversity, a dominant functional bacterial community was formed in water accumulated in the mined-out area due to human disturbance. Jurassic and Cretaceous groundwater showed lower microbial community diversity as they were limited by permeability and redox conditions. 64 phyla and 1,294 genera of microorganisms were identified: Proteobacteria (63.47%-85.15%) was the dominant bacterial group, Desulfobacterota (1.90%-5.80%) was enriched in deep groundwater, and Actinobacteriota (1.70%-4.50%) showed higher abundance in shallow groundwater. Water samples from the Jurassic system and mined-out areas shared 53 common genera, revealing hydraulic connections and pollution diffusion pathways. This indicated the source of water filling, and the highest number of unique genera (145 species), reflecting the significant disturbance of mining activities on microbial ecology. 11 environmental factors, including pH, NH4+, and K+, significantly influenced the community structure. Groundwater microbial communities showed significantly different response mechanisms to hydrochemical characteristics across different aquifers, reflecting the dominant role of hydrogeological background and types in the aquifers. The microbial community in the water accumulated in the mined-out area interacted most strongly with environmental factors, confirming that mining activities exacerbated the coupling effect between the environment and microorganisms. This study combines microbial community research with hydrological environmental indicators, offering new insights into the microbial ecological functions in the underground aquifer system of mining areas and the groundwater environment in mining-disturbed areas. This study provides references for groundwater source identification, pollution traceability, and microbial ecological restoration research in mining areas.

CLC number: TD745;X171 Document code: A Article ID: 2096-2193(2026)05-1142-14

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
Journal of Mining Science and Technology
Pages 1142-1155

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
Liu R, Li Y, Fang H. Hydrochemistry and microbial community of different aquifers in coal mining areas and their environmental responses. Journal of Mining Science and Technology, 2026, 11(5): 1142-1155. https://doi.org/10.19606/j.cnki.jmst.2025145

3

Views

0

Downloads

0

Crossref

0

Scopus

0

CSCD

Received: 24 July 2025
Revised: 19 August 2025
Published: 31 October 2026
© The Author(s) 2026

This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).