AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (1.2 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Clinical Research | Open Access

Surgical intervention versus conservative management in optic disc pit maculopathy

Zoé Dobbels1,2( ), Matteo Mario Carlà1, Nesrine Bokri1, Sophie Bonnin1,2, Raphaël Lejoyeux1,2, Aude Couturier1,2,3
Ophthalmology Department, Fondation Adolphe de Rothschild Hospital, Paris F-75019, France
Ophthalmology Department, Université Paris Cité, Paris F-75006, France
Ophthalmology Department, AP-HP, Lariboisière Hospital, Paris F-75010, France

Co-first Authors: Zoé Dobbels and Matteo Mario Carlà

Show Author Information

Abstract

AIM

To assess the functional and anatomical outcomes in patients with maculopathy related to an optic disc pit (ODP-M), managed with or without surgery.

METHODS

This retrospective monocentric study, included 52 patients (52 eyes) with ODP-M. Of these, 52% (n=27) were managed conservatively, while 48% (n=25) underwent surgery. Primary outcomes included changes in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and anatomical parameters [central macular thickness (CMT), sub-foveal choroidal thickness (SFCT)], as well as the rate of fluid resolution.

RESULTS

The mean age was 33.8±22.3y (range: 5–82y), with 27 females and 25 males. Median follow-up duration was 18.0mo [interquartile range (IQR) 7.0–41.5] for the non-surgical group and 15.0mo (IQR 9.0–48.0) for the surgical group. The surgical group demonstrated significantly greater BCVA improvement (mean change: -0.40±0.56 logMAR) compared with the non-surgical group (mean change: -0.03±0.19 logMAR; P=0.006). SFCT remained stable in the non-surgical group (mean change: +4.6±36.4 μm, P=0.74), and showed a greater decrease in the surgical group [mean change: -24.6 μm, 95% confidence interval (CI) -51.4 to +2.2 μm; P=0.06]. CMT decreased significantly in the surgical group (mean change: -392.2±287.9 μm, P<0.001), whereas it remained stable in the non-surgical group (mean change: -79.7±233.4 μm, P=0.09). Spontaneous subretinal fluid reduction was observed in 25.9% (n=7) of non-surgical eyes, compared with 72.0% (n=18) of surgical eyes (P<0.001), including complete fluid disappearance in 40.0% (n=10) of surgical cases.

CONCLUSION

Surgical intervention appears more effective than conservative management in achieving subretinal fluid reduction and BCVA improvement in eyes with ODP-M.

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
International Journal of Ophthalmology
Pages 2018-2025

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
Dobbels Z, Carlà MM, Bokri N, et al. Surgical intervention versus conservative management in optic disc pit maculopathy. International Journal of Ophthalmology, 2026, 19(10): 2018-2025. https://doi.org/10.18240/ijo.2026.10.17

5

Views

0

Downloads

0

Crossref

0

Web of Science

0

Scopus

0

CSCD

Received: 14 May 2026
Accepted: 14 July 2026
Published: 18 October 2026
© 2026 International Journal of Ophthalmology Press

This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).