AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (1.7 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Meta-analysis | Open Access

Diagnostic value of urinary albumin creatinine ratio in predicting vision-threatening diabetic retinopathy in patients with diabetes: a systematic review and Meta-analysis

Ying Gao1Jia-Yuan Zhuang1,2Yu-Yan Ren1Hua-Zhi Zhang1Yi-Ming Hu1Cheng-Hao Li2,3Mei Hu1,2Heng Zhou2( )Xiang-Xia Luo4( )
Clinical College of Chinese Medicine, Gansu University of Chinese Medicine, Lanzhou 730000, Gansu Province, China
School of Public Health & School of Nursing, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, Jiangsu Province, China
School of Medicine, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225000, Jiangsu Province, China
The First Affiliated Hospital, Gansu University of Chinese Medicine, Lanzhou 730000, Gansu Province, China

Co-first Authors: Ying Gao and Jia-Yuan Zhuang

Show Author Information

Abstract

AIM

To evaluate the predictive value of urinary albumin creatinine ratio (UACR), albumin excretion rate (AER), and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) for vision-threatening diabetic retinopathy (VTDR) in individuals with diabetes.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search across PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library from their inception to February 2024 were performed. The diagnostic accuracy of microalbuminuria (MA; including UACR and AER) and eGFR in predicting VTDR using sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio and negative likelihood ratio, diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), and the area under the summary receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve were assessed. Analyses incorporated both bivariate generalized linear mixed models and random-effects models to ensure a robust and unbiased interpretation of the data.

RESULTS

The review included 14 studies with a total of 87223 patients. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of MA and eGFR for predicting VTDR were 0.77 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.57–0.89] and 0.51 (95%CI, 0.31–0.72), respectively. The DOR was 3.47 (95%CI, 1.94–6.18), with the area under the summary ROC curve at 0.70 (95%CI, 0.66–0.74). Notably, UACR as a predictor showed a sensitivity of 0.88 (95%CI, 0.43–0.99) and specificity of 0.55 (95%CI, 0.22–0.84), with an area under the curve of 0.78 (95%CI, 0.74–0.82). Despite significant heterogeneity among the studies (P<0.01), no publication bias was detected.

CONCLUSION

UACR is a highly sensitive but moderately specific indicator for early detection and management strategies in this high-risk population.

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
International Journal of Ophthalmology
Pages 1800-1808

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
Gao Y, Zhuang J-Y, Ren Y-Y, et al. Diagnostic value of urinary albumin creatinine ratio in predicting vision-threatening diabetic retinopathy in patients with diabetes: a systematic review and Meta-analysis. International Journal of Ophthalmology, 2026, 19(9): 1800-1808. https://doi.org/10.18240/ijo.2026.09.16

2

Views

0

Downloads

0

Crossref

0

Web of Science

0

Scopus

0

CSCD

Received: 28 July 2025
Accepted: 18 December 2025
Published: 18 September 2026
© 2026 International Journal of Ophthalmology Press

This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).