AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (1.1 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Clinical Research | Open Access

Prediction of visual recovery after idiopathic macular hole surgery: a triad of tractional mechanics, subfoveal anatomy, and preoperative function

Li-Na Cheng1,2,3( )Song Wang1,2,3Hong-Bing Zhang1,2,3Hong-Song Li1,2,3Pei Chen1,2,3Yan-Yan Xue1,2,3
Department of Ophthalmology, Xi’an First Hospital, Xi’an 710000, Shaanxi Province, China
Shaanxi Provincial Clinical Research Center for Ophthalmology Diseases, First Affiliated Hospital of Northwest University, Xi’an 710000, Shaanxi Province, China
Shaanxi Institute of Ophthalmology, Xi’an 710000, Shaanxi Province, China
Show Author Information

Abstract

AIM

To establish and validate a multidimensional predictive model of postoperative visual recovery after idiopathic macular hole (IMH) surgery.

METHODS

Retrospective cohort study. Examinations within a three-month period, both pre- and postoperative, included assessments of best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), intraocular pressure (IOP), and morphological parameters of IMH with optical coherence tomography (OCT). Then, a series of indices were derived, including the IMH index (MHI), diameter hole index (DHI), macular hole closure index (MHCI), hole form factor (HFF), and tractional hole index (THI). Subfoveal anatomical damage (macular hole inferior volume, Vi) was calculated based on the basal diameter (BD), minimum diameter (MD), and height at the narrowest point (HMD) of IMH. Pearson correlation analysis was utilized to discern significant correlations between postoperative BCVA and the multiple indices examined. A subsequent linear correlation analysis was performed.

RESULTS

The study involved 51 eyes from 51 patients (mean age 66.90±6.07y) diagnosed with IMH. Preoperative BCVA was 1.22±0.76 logMAR and improved to 0.88±0.38 logMAR after surgery (P<0.001). The correlation analysis results showed significant correlations between postoperative BCVA and preoperative BCVA (P<0.001), BD (P=0.042), MD (P=0.001), MHI (P=0.047), THI (P=0.004), and Vi (P=0.007). The multidimensional model integrating THI, Vi, and preoperative BCVA significantly outperformed traditional predictors (MD, BD, and height) in terms of postoperative visual recovery prediction. THI, reflecting posterior vitreous traction mechanics, independently predicted anatomical reset potential (β=-0.06, P=0.022), while Vi, quantifying subfoveal photoreceptor disruption, was correlated with structural-functional recovery (β=0.01, P=0.046). Preoperative visual acuity served as a critical surrogate for retinal functional reserve (β=0.15, P=0.020). Redundant morphometric parameters (MHI, DHI, MHCI, HFF) were excluded, as their predictive contributions were subsumed by THI/Vi or mediated by preoperative vision.

CONCLUSION

The combination of biomechanical traction (THI), subfoveal anatomical damage (Vi), and preoperative BCVA represents a clinically applicable framework for predicting postoperative visual recovery after IMH surgery. This model can be used as a practical tool to guide surgical planning, facilitating the identification of high-risk patients who may benefit from additional techniques (such as an internal limiting membrane flap) while optimizing resource allocation for standard cases.

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
International Journal of Ophthalmology
Pages 742-749

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
Cheng L-N, Wang S, Zhang H-B, et al. Prediction of visual recovery after idiopathic macular hole surgery: a triad of tractional mechanics, subfoveal anatomy, and preoperative function. International Journal of Ophthalmology, 2026, 19(4): 742-749. https://doi.org/10.18240/ijo.2026.04.13

123

Views

2

Downloads

0

Crossref

0

Web of Science

0

Scopus

0

CSCD

Received: 15 April 2025
Accepted: 18 September 2025
Published: 18 April 2026
© 2026 International Journal of Ophthalmology Press

This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).