AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (857 KB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Clinical Research | Open Access

Positive/negative binocular fusional C-optotypes and 2D planar C-optotypes on transient accommodation and stability in adult eyes: implications for myopia prevention and control

Qing-Xia Fan1,2Jing Lin2Ling Xu2Wei He1,2( )
Eye Research Department, Dalian Medical University, Dalian 116044, Liaoning Province, China
Clinical Research Center, He Eye Specialist Hospital, Shenyang 110000, Liaoning Province, China
Show Author Information

Abstract

AIM

To investigate the effects of binocular fusional C-optotypes (positive/negative) and 2D planar C-optotypes on the amplitude and stability of transient accommodation (TAC) in adults, and to provide a basis for non-contact myopia intervention.

METHODS

This was a self-controlled study. Using red-blue 3D technology, four experimental stages were set up: Test A [fixating on the 1 m negative fusional C-optotypes, 8△ base-in (BI)], Test B (fixating on the 5 m planar C-optotypes), Test C (fixating on the 1 m planar C-optotypes), and Test D [fixating on the 1 m positive fusional C-optotypes, 20△ base-out (BO)]. A WAM-5500 open-field autorefractor was used to measure TAC and accommodative microfluctuations [evaluated via interquartile range (IQR) and median-based coefficient of variation (CVmed)]. Additionally, the convergence accommodation to convergence (CA/C) ratio was calculated, and a visual fatigue questionnaire was administered to assess participants’ subjective visual comfort.

RESULTS

A total of 21 subjects (7 males, 14 females; aged 23-41y) with normal binocular visual function were enrolled. The results showed that the TAC increased gradually across the four stages, and these values were Test A (-0.35±0.26 D)<Test B (-0.46±0.24 D)<Test C (-0.77±0.32 D) <Test D (-1.38±0.31 D). There were significant overall differences (F=56.136, P<0.001). Compared with Test C, Test A reduced TAC by 0.42 D (P<0.05), while Test D increased it by 0.61 D (P<0.001). There was no significant intergroup difference in accommodative fluctuation amplitude (all P>0.05), but the fluctuation stability of Test D showed a significant difference between the first 20s and the second 20s (P=0.017). The CA/C ratio was significantly higher in Test D (0.05±0.02 D/△) than in Test A (0.03±0.02 D/△, P=0.007), indicating stronger accommodation-convergence linkage during positive fusional fixation. The visual fatigue scores of all stages were low (median 0-1), with Test D slightly higher than Test B and Test C (P<0.05). No linear correlation was found between TAC and age (all r<0.1, P>0.05).

CONCLUSION

Negative fusional C-optotypes induce ciliary muscle relaxation to reduce TAC, while positive fusional C-optotypes enhance accommodation-convergence coordination to increase TAC. The red-blue 3D-based non-contact training mode exhibits good safety (median visual fatigue scores: 0-1 across all tests) and provides a novel dual-directional (relaxation-activation) strategy for myopia prevention and control.

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
International Journal of Ophthalmology
Pages 539-548

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
Fan Q-X, Lin J, Xu L, et al. Positive/negative binocular fusional C-optotypes and 2D planar C-optotypes on transient accommodation and stability in adult eyes: implications for myopia prevention and control. International Journal of Ophthalmology, 2026, 19(3): 539-548. https://doi.org/10.18240/ijo.2026.03.15

482

Views

24

Downloads

0

Crossref

0

Web of Science

0

Scopus

0

CSCD

Received: 09 October 2025
Accepted: 10 November 2025
Published: 18 March 2026
© 2026 International Journal of Ophthalmology Press

This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).