AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (1.1 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Clinical Research | Open Access

Comparison of visual outcomes between bilateral EDOF IOL implantation and combined EDOF and bifocal IOL implantation

Jia-Yan Fang1,2,3, Jing Jin1,2,3, Yi-Ling Jiang1,2,3, Fu-Man Yang1,2,3, Ping-Jun Chang1,2,3, Yin-Ying Zhao1,2,3( ), Yun-E Zhao1,2,3( )
National Clinical Research Center for Ocular Diseases, Eye Hospital, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou 325027, Zhejiang Province, China
State Key Laboratory of Eye Health, Eye Hospital, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou 325027, Zhejiang Province, China
Eye Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University at Hangzhou, Hangzhou 310000, Zhejiang Province, China
Show Author Information

Abstract

AIM

To compare the visual outcomes between bilateral implantation of Tecnis ZXR00 extended depth-of-focus (EDOF) intraocular lenses (IOLs) and mixed implantation of Tecnis ZXR00 (EDOF) with Tecnis ZMB00 (bifocal) IOLs.

METHODS

This postoperative cross-sectional study enrolled patients who underwent phacoemulsification combined with IOL implantation. Patients were divided into two groups: the bilateral ZXR00 group (ZXR00-only group) and the mixed IOL group (ZXR00+ZMB00 group). Primary outcome measures included uncorrected and corrected distance visual acuity (UDVA, CDVA), uncorrected and distance-corrected near visual acuity (UNVA, DCNVA), uncorrected and distance-corrected intermediate visual acuity (UIVA, DCIVA), and defocus curves. Secondary outcome measures were visual quality, spectacle independence, patient satisfaction, photic phenomena, and stereopsis.

RESULTS

A total of 47 patients (94 eyes) were included, with 26 patients (11 males, 15 females) in the ZXR00-only group (mean age: 62.73±7.24y) and 21 patients (7 males, 14 females) in the mixed group (mean age: 65.71±9.16y). There was no statistically significant difference in age between the two groups (P=0.218). The mixed group showed significantly better binocular DCNVA compared to the ZXR00-only group (P=0.002). Defocus curve analysis revealed that the mixed group exhibited superior performance at −2.5 to −4.0 D but inferior performance at −0.5 and −1.5 D. Near stereoacuity was significantly poorer in the mixed group (Randot: 5.589±0.744 vs 6.240±0.394 ln arcsec; Contour: 4.966±0.973 vs 5.740±0.833 ln arcsec; both P<0.01). Both groups achieved high levels of spectacle independence and patient satisfaction, with no significant differences in photic phenomena or questionnaire scores.

CONCLUSION

Mixed implantation of EDOF and bifocal IOLs improve near visual acuity but may compromise near stereopsis. This approach provides a viable option for patients prioritizing near vision; however, caution is recommended for individuals requiring fine stereoscopic vision for daily or professional tasks.

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
International Journal of Ophthalmology
Pages 266-272

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
Fang J-Y, Jin J, Jiang Y-L, et al. Comparison of visual outcomes between bilateral EDOF IOL implantation and combined EDOF and bifocal IOL implantation. International Journal of Ophthalmology, 2026, 19(2): 266-272. https://doi.org/10.18240/ijo.2026.02.08

1462

Views

71

Downloads

0

Crossref

0

Web of Science

0

Scopus

0

CSCD

Received: 11 February 2025
Accepted: 11 April 2025
Published: 18 February 2026
© 2026 International Journal of Ophthalmology Press

This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).