AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (476.7 KB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Clinical Research | Open Access

Refractive error and angle of deviation in basic esotropia versus exotropia: a comparative study

Babak Masoomian1, Mohammad Reza Akbari1, Arash Mirmohammadsadeghi1, Sajida Madeeh Fadhl2, Ali Majdi3, Kimia Daneshvar1, Masoud Khorrami-Nejad2( )
Translational Ophthalmology Research Center, Farabi Eye Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran 1336616351, Iran
Optometry Department, School of Rehabilitation, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran 1416634793, Iran
Medical Laboratories Techniques Department, College of Health and Medical Techniques, Al-Mustaqbal University, Babylon 51001, Iraq
Show Author Information

Abstract

AIM

To compare refractive error and angle of deviation in patients with basic esotropia and basic exotropia.

METHODS

A retrospective review was conducted on the medical records of patients with basic-type strabismus. Demographic data, refractive error, best-corrected distance visual acuity (BCVA), and the horizontal and vertical angle of deviation between basic esotropia and exotropia patients were compared.

RESULTS

Among the 7129 patients (mean age 22.98±14.81y) evaluated, 44.7% (3185 cases, 54.9% male) exhibited basic-type esotropia, while 55.3% (3944 cases, 53.9% male) presented with basic-type exotropia. Basic esotropia cases exhibited more hyperopic spherical equivalent measurements in both eyes (right: 0.53±3.07 vs left: 0.56±2.98 D) than those with basic exotropia (right eye: -0.33±2.84 vs left eye: -0.24±2.68 D, P<0.001 for both eyes). Patients with basic esotropia had significantly greater horizontal deviation angles (near: 36.08±18.87 PD and far: 35.56±18.75 PD) compared to those with basic exotropia (near: 33.75±16.11 PD and far: 33.26±15.90 PD, P<0.001). Conversely, patients with basic exotropia had slightly higher vertical deviation angles (near: 1.67±5.80 PD and far: 1.72±5.89 PD) compared to those with basic esotropia (near: 1.12±4.57 PD and far: 1.12±4.58 PD, P<0.001). Patients with basic esotropia underwent surgical intervention at younger ages compared to basic exotropia individuals (19.68±15.99 vs 25.66±13.20, P<0.001).

CONCLUSION

Basic esotropia patients present more hyperopic refractive errors, better visual acuity, larger horizontal yet smaller vertical ocular misalignments, and tend to undergo strabismus surgery at younger ages relative to basic exotropia cases.

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
International Journal of Ophthalmology
Pages 2339-2344

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
Masoomian B, Akbari MR, Mirmohammadsadeghi A, et al. Refractive error and angle of deviation in basic esotropia versus exotropia: a comparative study. International Journal of Ophthalmology, 2025, 18(12): 2339-2344. https://doi.org/10.18240/ijo.2025.12.16

635

Views

34

Downloads

0

Crossref

0

Web of Science

0

Scopus

0

CSCD

Received: 25 July 2024
Accepted: 03 March 2025
Published: 18 December 2025
© 2025 International Journal of Ophthalmology Press

This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).