AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (602.8 KB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Investigation | Open Access

Frequency and associated factors of accommodation and non-strabismic binocular vision dysfunction among medical university students

Jie Cai1Wen-Wen Fan2Yun-Hui Zhong3Cai-Lan Wen3Xiao-Dan Wei3Wan-Chen Wei3Wan-Yan Xiang3Jin-Mao Chen1( )
Department of Ophthalmology, First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning 530021, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, China
Digital and Intelligent Technology Transformation and Application Research Institute of Visual Function, Tianjin 300000, China
Guangxi Medical University, Nanning 530021, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, China
Show Author Information

Abstract

AIM

To investigate the frequency and associated factors of accommodation and non-strabismic binocular vision dysfunction among medical university students.

METHODS

Totally 158 student volunteers underwent routine vision examination in the optometry clinic of Guangxi Medical University. Their data were used to identify the different types of accommodation and non-strabismic binocular vision dysfunction and to determine their frequency. Correlation analysis and logistic regression were used to examine the factors associated with these abnormalities.

RESULTS

The results showed that 36.71% of the subjects had accommodation and non-strabismic binocular vision issues, with 8.86% being attributed to accommodation dysfunction and 27.85% to binocular abnormalities. Convergence insufficiency (CI) was the most common abnormality, accounting for 13.29%. Those with these abnormalities experienced higher levels of eyestrain (χ2=69.518, P<0.001). The linear correlations were observed between the difference of binocular spherical equivalent (SE) and the index of horizontal esotropia at a distance (r=0.231, P=0.004) and the asthenopia survey scale (ASS) score (r=0.346, P<0.001). Furthermore, the right eye's SE was inversely correlated with the convergence of positive and negative fusion images at close range (r= -0.321, P<0.001), the convergence of negative fusion images at close range (r=-0.294, P<0.001), the vergence facility (VF; r=-0.234, P=0.003), and the set of negative fusion images at far range (r=-0.237, P=0.003). Logistic regression analysis indicated that gender, age, and the difference in right and binocular SE did not influence the emergence of these abnormalities.

CONCLUSION

Binocular vision abnormalities are more prevalent than accommodation dysfunction, with CI being the most frequent type. Greater binocular refractive disparity leads to more severe eyestrain symptoms.

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
International Journal of Ophthalmology
Pages 374-379

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
Cai J, Fan W-W, Zhong Y-H, et al. Frequency and associated factors of accommodation and non-strabismic binocular vision dysfunction among medical university students. International Journal of Ophthalmology, 2024, 17(2): 374-379. https://doi.org/10.18240/ijo.2024.02.22

508

Views

32

Downloads

6

Crossref

5

Web of Science

7

Scopus

0

CSCD

Received: 21 July 2023
Accepted: 17 November 2023
Published: 18 February 2024
© 2024 International Journal of Ophthalmology Press

This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).