AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (3 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Intelligent Ophthalmology | Open Access

Predicting visual acuity with machine learning in treated ocular trauma patients

Zhi-Lu Zhou1,2Yi-Fei Yan3,4Jie-Min Chen2Liu Rui-Jue2Xiao-Ying Yu2Meng Wang2Hong-Xia Hao2,5Dong-Mei Liu2Qi Zhang3,4( )Jie Wang1( )Wen-Tao Xia2( )
Department of Forensic Medicine, Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang 550009, Guizhou Province, China
Shanghai Key Laboratory of Forensic Medicine, Shanghai Forensic Service Platform, Institute of Forensic Science, Ministry of Justice, Shanghai 200063, China
The SMART (Smart Medicine and AI-based Radiology Technology) Lab, Shanghai Institute for Advanced Communication and Data Science, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200444, China
School of Communication and Information Engineering, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200444, China
Basic Medical College, Jiamusi University, Jiamusi 154007, Heilongjiang Province, China

Co-first authors: Zhi-Lu Zhou, Yi-Fei Yan, and Jie-Min Chen

Show Author Information

Abstract

AIM

To predict best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) by machine learning in patients with ocular trauma who were treated for at least 6mo.

METHODS

The internal dataset consisted of 850 patients with 1589 eyes and an average age of 44.29y. The initial visual acuity was 0.99 logMAR. The test dataset consisted of 60 patients with 100 eyes collected while the model was optimized. Four different machine-learning algorithms (Extreme Gradient Boosting, support vector regression, Bayesian ridge, and random forest regressor) were used to predict BCVA, and four algorithms (Extreme Gradient Boosting, support vector machine, logistic regression, and random forest classifier) were used to classify BCVA in patients with ocular trauma after treatment for 6mo or longer. Clinical features were obtained from outpatient records, and ocular parameters were extracted from optical coherence tomography images and fundus photographs. These features were put into different machine-learning models, and the obtained predicted values were compared with the actual BCVA values. The best-performing model and the best variable selected were further evaluated in the test dataset.

RESULTS

There was a significant correlation between the predicted and actual values [all Pearson correlation coefficient (PCC)>0.6]. Considering only the data from the traumatic group (group A) into account, the lowest mean absolute error (MAE) and root mean square error (RMSE) were 0.30 and 0.40 logMAR, respectively. In the traumatic and healthy groups (group B), the lowest MAE and RMSE were 0.20 and 0.33 logMAR, respectively. The sensitivity was always higher than the specificity in group A, in contrast to the results in group B. The classification accuracy and precision were above 0.80 in both groups. The MAE, RMSE, and PCC of the test dataset were 0.20, 0.29, and 0.96, respectively. The sensitivity, precision, specificity, and accuracy of the test dataset were 0.83, 0.92, 0.95, and 0.90, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Predicting BCVA using machine-learning models in patients with treated ocular trauma is accurate and helpful in the identification of visual dysfunction.

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
International Journal of Ophthalmology
Pages 1005-1014

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
Zhou Z-L, Yan Y-F, Chen J-M, et al. Predicting visual acuity with machine learning in treated ocular trauma patients. International Journal of Ophthalmology, 2023, 16(7): 1005-1014. https://doi.org/10.18240/ijo.2023.07.02

328

Views

26

Downloads

1

Crossref

1

Web of Science

2

Scopus

0

CSCD

Received: 05 May 2022
Accepted: 29 May 2023
Published: 18 July 2023
© 2023 International Journal of Ophthalmology Press

This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).