AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (2.1 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Regular Paper | Open Access

Evaluation of Field-diffusion Charging Models for Airborne Suspended Particles Charged by Corona Ions: Sum of Charge Quantities and Sum of Charging Rates

Kun He1 ( )Xiaoqian Ma2Li Xie1Yong Ju1Jiayu Lu1Luxing Zhao1
Xizang Yangbajing High Altitude Electrical Safety and Electromagnetic Environment National Observation and Research Station (China Electric Power Research Institute), Beijing 100192, China
State Grid Economic and Technological Research Institute Co. Ltd, Beijing 102209, China
Show Author Information

Abstract

To evaluate field-diffusion charging models, a systematic comparative study is conducted in this paper. A field-diffusion charge quantity sum model (FDCQSM) and a field-diffusion charging rate sum model (FDCRSM) are introduced in which the Maxwell-Wagner relaxation model for unipolar field charging is proposed to extend to bipolar charging. The predictions of the two models are compared with the experimental results reported in literature over wide ranges of particle diameters and electric fields. The results show that the FDCQSM is in good consistency with the experiments, while the FDCRSM performs well only if either diffusion charging or field charging dominates. Moreover, the physical meaning of the FDCRSM, the effects of ion property and the particle’s conductivity on the particle charge, and applicability of the FDCQSM are discussed. The outcome, in which FDCRSM works badly when field charging and diffusion charging are important, indicates that it is likely to be as factual as FDCQSM. And FDCQSM seems to be valid in the study of the effects of aerosols on the electrical environment around high voltage direct current (HVDC) transmission lines, while FDCRSM is not recommended.

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
CSEE Journal of Power and Energy Systems
Pages 931-943

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
He K, Ma X, Xie L, et al. Evaluation of Field-diffusion Charging Models for Airborne Suspended Particles Charged by Corona Ions: Sum of Charge Quantities and Sum of Charging Rates. CSEE Journal of Power and Energy Systems, 2025, 11(2): 931-943. https://doi.org/10.17775/CSEEJPES.2021.05960

509

Views

60

Downloads

1

Crossref

2

Web of Science

2

Scopus

0

CSCD

Received: 13 August 2021
Revised: 29 September 2021
Accepted: 23 October 2021
Published: 18 August 2022
© 2021 CSEE.

This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).