AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (1,004.2 KB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Publishing Language: Chinese | Open Access

Construction and practice of the “three-in-one” laboratory safety culture ecosystem

Yulong WANG1, Li LIU1, Min GUO1, Yang LIANG2( )
Office of Laboratory Management and Support, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin 150040, China
College of Life Science, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin 150040, China
Show Author Information

Abstract

Significance

Although universities place growing emphasis on safety, safety incidents continue to happen from time to time, making it an enduring issue that demands ongoing monitoring and enhancement. On the one hand, teachers and students lack subjective initiative in safety work, often regarding safety regulations as an externally imposed burden rather than an internal need. On the other hand, common problems in daily management include the gradual weakening of responsibility transmission along the chain, superficial implementation of regulations, and gaps in the development of students' safety behaviors. The root cause underlying these phenomena is that universities have yet to build a cultural ecosystem that integrates responsibility, regulations, people, and environment; without the influence of culture, even the most detailed regulations may amount to empty talk.

Progress

To address this problem, Northeast Forestry University has systematically explored and innovatively constructed a “three-in-one” laboratory safety culture ecosystem, built on three pillars: safety responsibility as the foundation, safety guarantee as the support, and safety culture as the guide. The core logic of this system is to attach the “soul” of safety culture to the “body” of safety management; through the organic integration of responsibility enforcement, condition support, and cultural guidance, it creates an intrinsically safe educational environment. In practice, this ecosystem is implemented across three levels. First, at the institutional level, the university has built a comprehensive and clearly structured “institutional jungle” and established a sound supervision and accountability mechanism to ensure that every safety task follows clear rules and evidence. Second, in terms of hardware support, the university has introduced advanced physical and technical protection measures, implemented full-process digital management of hazardous chemicals, and created a full-coverage, three-dimensional safety protection network integrating environmental monitoring, intelligent early warning, and emergency response and providing solid support for the implementation of safety work. Third, at the level of cultural guidance, the university adopts systematic safety education and intensive training, building an integrated safety education system that combines classroom teaching, practical training, and virtual simulation, and setting role models in laboratory safety management to provide soft guidance. This approach stimulates teachers' and students' sense of safety identification, gradually creating a laboratory cultural atmosphere in which “everyone speaks of safety and acts for safety.” This allows the safety culture to genuinely take hold in the hearts and minds of all members.

Conclusions and Prospects

Through the continuous implementation of a series of safety culture measures with a distinctive “Northeast Forestry University identity,” the university effectively cultivates a conscious safety awareness among teachers and students, driving a fundamental transformation of the safety management model from “passive constraint” to “active internalization” as the seed of safety takes root and grows in the hearts of all members of the university community. Ultimately, the effectiveness of laboratory safety governance is considerably improved, laying a solid foundation for cultivating innovative talent with a high level of safety literacy and providing a replicable, scalable practical model for building a robust campus safety defense line and advancing the modernization of university laboratory safety governance.

CLC number: G642.0 Document code: A Article ID: 1002-4956(2026)09-0265-06

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
Experimental Technology and Management
Pages 265-270

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
WANG Y, LIU L, GUO M, et al. Construction and practice of the “three-in-one” laboratory safety culture ecosystem. Experimental Technology and Management, 2026, 43(9): 265-270. https://doi.org/10.16791/j.cnki.sjg.2026.09.033

2

Views

0

Downloads

0

Crossref

0

Scopus

Received: 31 March 2026
Revised: 12 May 2026
Published: 20 September 2026
© 2026 Experimental Technology and Management. All rights reserved.

This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).