AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (827.1 KB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Expert Review | Publishing Language: Chinese | Open Access

Recurrent implantation failure in assisted reproduction: redefining diagnostic boundaries and shifting from empirical intervention to evidence-based selection

Wei HE( )Yunzhu LAN
Reproductive Medicine Center, Chongqing Municipal Assisted Reproductive Clinical Diagnosis and Treatment Center, Key Laboratory of Reproductive Health of Chongqing Colleges and Universities, First Affiliated Hospital, Army Medical University (Third Military Medical University), Chongqing, China
Show Author Information

Abstract

Recurrent implantation failure (RIF) is defined as the failure to achieve clinical pregnancy despite multiple transfers of high-quality embryos during assisted reproductive technology (ART) treatment. The definition of RIF has not been unified, with discrepancies primarily centering on maternal age, number of embryo transfers and total embryos transferred, criteria for high-quality embryo assessment, and estimation of cumulative pregnancy probability. In this article, we systematically review the evolution of RIF definitions and the impact of aneuploid embryo transfer on pregnancy outcomes; evaluate the diagnostic and therapeutic limitations of preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) and endometrial receptivity analysis (ERA); re-examine the evidence-based rationale for screening chronic endometritis, endometrial microbiome, and immunological and thrombophilic factors; and highlight recent major advances in single-cell sequencing of the endometrium. We advocate for active investigation and management of identifiable pathological conditions that affect pregnancy outcomes, caution against “empirical multiple interventions,” and call for a return to the therapeutic principle of “first, do no harm.” It is anticipated that artificial intelligence-driven integrative multimodal modeling and real-world data registry studies will serve as breakthroughs for the diagnosis and treatment of RIF.

CLC number: R711.6; R321-33; R714.21 Document code: A

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
Journal of Army Medical University
Pages 1939-1948

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
HE W, LAN Y. Recurrent implantation failure in assisted reproduction: redefining diagnostic boundaries and shifting from empirical intervention to evidence-based selection. Journal of Army Medical University, 2026, 48(14): 1939-1948. https://doi.org/10.16016/j.2097-0927.202606087

0

Views

0

Downloads

0

Crossref

0

Scopus

0

CSCD

Received: 22 June 2026
Revised: 06 July 2026
Published: 30 July 2026
© 2026 Journal of Army Medical University

This is an open access article under the CC BY license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).